The First Amendment was defended today... and in a big way.

 

Today, in a unanimous decision by the US Supreme Court, The Slants won the right to register their trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office after a long fought legal struggle in which big government decided that it's the job of the Federal Government to deny protections to American business that, in their opinion, the titles are offensive to the politically correct, cry baby, snowflake American faction... also known as Progressives.

 

The Washington Redskins will be getting their trademarks back... bite it babies.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/supreme-court-rules-trademark-law-banning-offensive-names-is-unconstitutional.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/washington-redskins-owner-thrilled-by-supreme-courts-trademark-ruling.html

You make me physically ill.

I saw that earlier today. 8-0 rulings sure are rare these days.

Mostly unrelated but I saw the Slants play in person years ago at a convention that totally wasn't Japanimation related back in 2007. Crazy to see a local band have such controversy.  

The First Amendment was defended today... and in a big way.

 

Today, in a unanimous decision by the US Supreme Court, The Slants won the right to register their trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office after a long fought legal struggle in which big government decided that it's the job of the Federal Government to deny protections to American business that, in their opinion, the titles are offensive to the politically correct, cry baby, snowflake American faction... also known as Progressives.

 

The Washington Redskins will be getting their trademarks back... bite it babies.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/supreme-court-rules-trademark-law-banning-offensive-names-is-unconstitutional.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/washington-redskins-owner-thrilled-by-supreme-courts-trademark-ruling.html

 

Finally we'll see the judicial side starting to do their part to throw out this BS that we've had to deal with for the past 8 years. Full change in all 3 branches means we're in for a lot of positive change. I can't wait to see the next ruling

 

 

You make me physically ill.

 

Because he celebrates a victory over the most hateful of all groups, Progressives?

TBH, I personally don't mind the Redskins football mascot, but it does indeed have a pretty racist tone to it. Native Americans are not just some savage animals to be used as a mascot. It's like making a team called the Gringos or Yellowskins. 

Having known plenty of native Americans, I feel for them, more than I do any other disadvantaged race in our society. They are generally isolated from American society in ways that Africans or Hispanics never have been and most of their culture has been completely wiped out. What remains of it has been taken over by money, stereotyped and sold by the wealthy (both native and white alike). The worst part is that these stereotypes have become so deeply embedded and the disconnect between the two societies so severe, that today, even things that would normally be considered racist towards ethnicities, is not considered racist toward Natives. 

I think it's some seriously fucked up bullshit how Americans do not make more of an effort to remember and honor the original people of this land. We'll devote an entire month to slavery and black people while turning Thanksgiving into a stereotyped whitewashed charade of bullshit.  

 

In any case like I said; I personally have no problem with the Redskins mascot (perhaps a name change, though?), but blowing it off like our history is nothing, being part of the largest sports/entertainment franchise in US history, is shameful.

 

 

The First Amendment was defended today... and in a big way.

 

Today, in a unanimous decision by the US Supreme Court, The Slants won the right to register their trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office after a long fought legal struggle in which big government decided that it's the job of the Federal Government to deny protections to American business that, in their opinion, the titles are offensive to the politically correct, cry baby, snowflake American faction... also known as Progressives.

 

The Washington Redskins will be getting their trademarks back... bite it babies.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/supreme-court-rules-trademark-law-banning-offensive-names-is-unconstitutional.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/washington-redskins-owner-thrilled-by-supreme-courts-trademark-ruling.html

 

 

 

Finally we'll see the judicial side starting to do their part to throw out this BS that we've had to deal with for the past 8 years. Full change in all 3 branches means we're in for a lot of positive change. I can't wait to see the next ruling

 

 

You make me physically ill.

 

 

 

Because he celebrates a victory over the most hateful of all groups, Progressives?

I laughed

 

The First Amendment was defended today... and in a big way.

 

Today, in a unanimous decision by the US Supreme Court, The Slants won the right to register their trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office after a long fought legal struggle in which big government decided that it's the job of the Federal Government to deny protections to American business that, in their opinion, the titles are offensive to the politically correct, cry baby, snowflake American faction... also known as Progressives.

 

The Washington Redskins will be getting their trademarks back... bite it babies.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/supreme-court-rules-trademark-law-banning-offensive-names-is-unconstitutional.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/19/washington-redskins-owner-thrilled-by-supreme-courts-trademark-ruling.html

 

Finally we'll see the judicial side starting to do their part to throw out this BS that we've had to deal with for the past 8 years. Full change in all 3 branches means we're in for a lot of positive change. I can't wait to see the next ruling

 

 

You make me physically ill.

 

Because he celebrates a victory over the most hateful of all groups, Progressives?

 

You know, I'm more progressive than anything:

 

https://8values.github.io/

 

And there is probably nothing I actually hate. Progressivism embraces exactly what the name implies; progress. It should be clear to anyone who knows anything about history that nothing is static. Everything will inevitably progress one way or the other. How it progresses will be decided by those who recognize and embrace it. Tradition will always serve a place in any human society, but do not make the mistake of assuming that tradition will never evolve. It absolutely and always will change. We didn't go from caves and forests to skyscrapers and space stations by rejecting progress. 

We should remember our history, not repeat it. 

Fox Fire, when we refer to Progressives, the ones with the capital "P," we're referring to the groups and organizations that are actually regressive in their thoughts and beliefs. The type of groups that have all those whiny and self-empowered SJWs who seem to want nothing more than to seethe hate to the Conservative side of the United States...

Observe, here is a rather rudimentary photo from when segregation was first being dismantled in the country. A truly progressive moment:

 

http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140407074041-restricted-04-civil-rights-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg

 

Notice the very pissed person behind her? That's a regressive, someone who hated the ideal of us moving past segregation to something bigger and better.

 

 

Now, this next photo might shock you:

 

 

I present to you: The modern day common "Progressive." Looks pretty similar huh? Maybe long-distance cousins...

Heh, nice site. This is me:

 

 

Classical Liberalism is correct.

 

The problem with the group we call "Progressives" today, is that as Lord Sunday pointed out, are actually regressive. Their maniacal fixation on ethnocentrism and cultural heritage is proof of that. Culture is worthless on its own, it's values that matter.

This is me:

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q105/mmeyer474/canvas.png

Apparently I'm Bernie Sanders. That's not true, and some of those questions were worded terribly, as I lean more conservative fiscally. Socially it's accurate, as it is with the other items.

 

My point is this: I don't condone hate in any fashion. Trademarks like the Washington Football Team are known slurs and have been for years and shouldn't be protected marks. Even the band name shouldn't be protected via a trademark - however, if they want to use that as their name I won't stop them. Same with the Washington Football team. I'm saying that the government should have some decency standards for trademark protection.

 

As for Lys, him and I will never agree, and I'm OK with that. However, him trumpeting the success of hate speech makes me sick.

 

Now excuse me while I puke on his shoes.

Finister is right, some of those questions could have been worded better.

 

My results are relatively spot on, although I was surprised to see the Civil Axis lean more towards Authority. I typically tend to fall more on the Liberty side.

 

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p268/Airsoft_Commando/canvas_zpsk8fcbz9b.png

@ Finster

 

Is it really hate speech though? It's not the best name ever, but this is what I'm talking about when I say "Progressives" are so fixated on ethnicity, acting like it's a crime against humanity. As for hurt feelings - there was not one idea in history over which someone wasn't offended.

@ Finster

 

Is it really take speech though? It's not the best name ever, but this is what I'm talking about when I say "Progressives" are so fixated on ethnicity, acting like it's a crime against humanity. As for hurt feelings - there was not one idea in history over which someone wasn't offended.

Terms like spic, shine, slope, etc. have always been taken in a negative connotation by those it was directed at. I would like to think that us, as a society, are better than that.

 

But, I will say that we've come a long way towards being more tolerant of others. All I'm suggesting is that the government shouldn't be giving sanction to names that can be considered offensive to a significant group of people. That's (very simplified) what a trademark is doing. Personally, if they want to use the name to identify themselves, have at it. The court of public opinion will ultimately decide whether or not they succeed.

Wow! I'm surprised and so happy that I could take a couple seconds of my time last night and post up something that gets people thinking in here. The Slants have given IRON a bit of a shot in the arm today.

 

Listen up... if I was to name my band today it would not be The Slants, Butthole Surfers, The Redskins, or Violent Femmes. Although I would be tempted to call it The Deplorables, and Gringos would be pretty cool. The point is it's not the job of the Federal Government to force nice on the American people. Part of being an American is freedom to be who you are. You can get rich selling a pill targeting the calorically challenged, or you can get rich selling a pill targeting the grossly fat. It looks like the Supreme Court agrees with me. If we charge the law to begin limiting free speech on the opinions of a politically appointed individual we're in real trouble as Americans. I believe that is the goal of Progressives... to change our country into their country.

 

This graph test you guys are doing... I'll do mine now!

I've all ready trademarked "The Deplorables." If you want the name you'll have to pay me handsomely.

 

I'd so listen to a band called that.

On an unrelated note, I think the "Basket of Deplorables" comment played a major part in Hillary losing the elections. It pushed many fence-sitters to the other side, and caused many on the other side to double down on Trump.

For some reason the picture will not post for me. I thought some of the questions were vague or too broad. I do have strong opinions and this explains how strong the scoring was. It must have been the drug questions... they called it "drug use" which is wrong because we all use drugs. They should have called it "drug abuse" but I guess that would be judgmental. I believe drug abuse to be horribly destructive, but that all comes from personal experience. I'm a little disappointed... I guess I'm more of a Statist than I thought. Enjoy ripping me apart over these results.

 

Neo-Conservatism

Economic Axis: Capitalist... Markets 80.5%

Diplomatic Axis: Nationalist... Nation 80.9%

Civil Axis: Statist... Authority 60.8%

Societal Axis: Traditional... Tradition 65%

 

This was fun!

I'm surprised to see that according to this, you are a statist. I thought you hated state authority.

I'm surprised to see that according to this, you are a statist. I thought you hated state authority.

I think some of the Civil Axis questions might not be calculated correctly. I agreed with some points that Progressives tend to push for. But the ones I did agree with, I only agreed with it to the point of the Government having little to no involvement. I'm beginning to think some of those questions were inadvertently implying Government intervention even if the question didn't actually state it specifically.

I'm surprised to see that according to this, you are a statist. I thought you hated state authority.

Yeah, like I said it must be the drug questions, combined with my strong support for the law. I would give a heroin addict about 2 chances to clean up. After that just give them all they want until they're dead. If they don't care, why should we?

http://i67.tinypic.com/70e6vd.png

 

 

Now, this next photo might shock you:     I present to you: The modern day common "Progressive." Looks pretty similar huh? Maybe long-distance cousins...

I saw this picture the first time, but now it's not showing up. 

EVERY other site i've taken a test on has put me as very far onto the 'Personal Liberty" scale away from authority; though I do agree with the other 3. The civil axis is the only one I feel is different from everywhere else. Other than that, the questions seemed to not have a lot of depth to them. like "Do you support a worldwide initiative for climate change?" Well, it what aspect? A forced initiative that countries will likely ignore anyway or an incentive initiative that doesn't force anything but instead rewards those that follow it. This isn't a specific example or anything, just saying I felt the questions could've offered more depth to what they were specifically asking and instead of the "agree, disagree" more of a "how would you like to handle X situation"

 

 

https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=37.8&d=26.6&g=52.7&s=51.4

 

I'm surprised to see that according to this, you are a statist. I thought you hated state authority.

Yeah, like I said it must be the drug questions, combined with my strong support for the law. I would give a heroin addict about 2 chances to clean up. After that just give them all they want until they're dead. If they don't care, why should we?

 

 

I wouldn't be so drastic, but I agree that there's only so many chances you can give someone. No sense in trying to keep helping people who refuse to help themselves.

 

On another note, the survey does peg you as "Neocon", which based on your interactions here I's say is pretty accurate

 

 

On another note, the survey does peg you as "Neocon", which based on your interactions here I's say is pretty accurate

Well, I am a very strong Constitutional Capitalist that loves my country... if that's Neo-Conservative, I'll embrace it, no problem.