1091 replies to this topic

[Lord MK]

Yeah, you make a good point there, Robert.

Rhizo, iSoc has the joint lowest posts, but you picked out CoD.
You ignored the 4 people below him, noticeably Lachiton who is usually very active, and iSoc.

It seems you want to shift the weights around or trying to stay low (i am inclined towards the latter)

FoS: Rhizo

Lachiton, your post count is very low compared to your normal behaviour.
Maybe you are in a scum team with newbies and just wants to lay low.
I want to see more of you on here.
But i think you do these blackouts now and then. So i am just gonna leave you at that.

Brewers, SM is ahead of you in post count.
Scuminess detected.

FoS: Brewers

And where is Samus?
He was making a lot of excitement about his comeback, even going to the length of making an entire thread to get others' opinions on it.
Now that the game started, at least he could shoot up now and then.

[legoboyvdlp]

 

I would hope that's a genuine compliment to me considering that you were no better when you jumped on the bandwagon against me after I posted but before I voted for Samus. So thank you!

 

 

You seem to misunderstand. I originally voted you in RVS for inactivity, but when someone said they had talked to you and you were coming I unvoted. But you claimed to be lurking causing me to vote you, since your lurking reason was extremely weak. After your first post. 

 

VGN and TW however didn't unvote after he posted, their votes were for his inactivity. 

 

Almost everyone except for those two and me had unvoted, and I was thinking of doing it, when I saw your attempt to start a wagon on Samus. I don't see how you can say I "jumped on the bandwagon", when I led the bandwagon that formed after your first post on the game. 

 

Someone asked this before. Why shouldn't we lynch you today? Who do you think we should lynch?

 

Also, page 9 and no serious no-lynch argument yet? Did I miss it?

My only reason for maintaining my vote on you is because you are behaving like I remember myself doing in my first scum game.

[Samus]

Yeah, you make a good point there, Robert.

Rhizo, iSoc has the joint lowest posts, but you picked out CoD.
You ignored the 4 people below him, noticeably Lachiton who is usually very active, and iSoc.

It seems you want to shift the weights around or trying to stay low (i am inclined towards the latter)

FoS: Rhizo

Lachiton, your post count is very low compared to your normal behaviour.
Maybe you are in a scum team with newbies and just wants to lay low.
I want to see more of you on here.
But i think you do these blackouts now and then. So i am just gonna leave you at that.

Brewers, SM is ahead of you in post count.
Scuminess detected.

FoS: Brewers

And where is Samus?
He was making a lot of excitement about his comeback, even going to the length of making an entire thread to get others' opinions on it.
Now that the game started, at least he could shoot up now and then.

I posted already incase you missed that.

 

Vote iSocialism

[brewersalliance]

unvote: Jazzy

 

vote: Sister Midnight

 

how dare she have more posts than me  

blame MK, he pointed it out haha 

[Ali bin Turban]

 

 

I would hope that's a genuine compliment to me considering that you were no better when you jumped on the bandwagon against me after I posted but before I voted for Samus. So thank you!

 

 

You seem to misunderstand. I originally voted you in RVS for inactivity, but when someone said they had talked to you and you were coming I unvoted. But you claimed to be lurking causing me to vote you, since your lurking reason was extremely weak. After your first post. 

 

VGN and TW however didn't unvote after he posted, their votes were for his inactivity. 

 

Almost everyone except for those two and me had unvoted, and I was thinking of doing it, when I saw your attempt to start a wagon on Samus. I don't see how you can say I "jumped on the bandwagon", when I led the bandwagon that formed after your first post on the game. 

 

Someone asked this before. Why shouldn't we lynch you today? Who do you think we should lynch?

 

Also, page 9 and no serious no-lynch argument yet? Did I miss it?

My only reason for maintaining my vote on you is because you are behaving like I remember myself doing in my first scum game.

 

Since you're talkative atm, I'd like to ask you one thing.

 

First you vote on Jazzy, then you unvote and welcome him, even though he hasn't posted yet. Canik immediately points that out, you make some shady comment about that. Then few hours later Jazzy posts. And just another few hours after that you vote Jazzy again, "for lurking".

 

How can you vote someone for lurking just few hours after he posts something?

[brewersalliance]

ok since I now have more posts than sm...

 

Unvote: Sister Midnight

 

Lachiton, you are very quiet.  You are usually really active and much more vocal... seems a little suspicious to me, like you are just lurking.  You posted asking for Jazzy to say something with substance about who he is suspicious of yet at the same time you have been very very quiet

 

FoS Lachiton

[Imran Ehsan]

 

Inactives should be lynched. The earlier the better. Scum wont kill inactives because inactives are just 1 less vote for town to lynch scum. so they are nothing but a burden for townies.   unvote   Vote: Rafay   when everyone is active lynch Rafay (oldbie mafia players will know why)

 

Why so inclined for lynches? 

 

 

You do realize that the only way town can win is by lynching?

 

Unless of course you are scum and your method of winning is not dependant entirely on lynchings.

[SeaBeeGipson]

 

 

 

I would hope that's a genuine compliment to me considering that you were no better when you jumped on the bandwagon against me after I posted but before I voted for Samus. So thank you!

 

 

You seem to misunderstand. I originally voted you in RVS for inactivity, but when someone said they had talked to you and you were coming I unvoted. But you claimed to be lurking causing me to vote you, since your lurking reason was extremely weak. After your first post. 

 

VGN and TW however didn't unvote after he posted, their votes were for his inactivity. 

 

Almost everyone except for those two and me had unvoted, and I was thinking of doing it, when I saw your attempt to start a wagon on Samus. I don't see how you can say I "jumped on the bandwagon", when I led the bandwagon that formed after your first post on the game. 

 

Someone asked this before. Why shouldn't we lynch you today? Who do you think we should lynch?

 

Also, page 9 and no serious no-lynch argument yet? Did I miss it?

My only reason for maintaining my vote on you is because you are behaving like I remember myself doing in my first scum game.

 

Since you're talkative atm, I'd like to ask you one thing.

 

First you vote on Jazzy, then you unvote and welcome him, even though he hasn't posted yet. Canik immediately points that out, you make some shady comment about that. Then few hours later Jazzy posts. And just another few hours after that you vote Jazzy again, "for lurking".

 

How can you vote someone for lurking just few hours after he posts something?

 

Unvote Samus (welcome back my boi)

I'll have to re-read the thread and see the timeline, but if Lego bounced around like that before Jazzy even appeared, FoS on Lego and slight FoS on Jazzy. 
Could be Lego trying to distance himself from a scum partner.

[Lachiton]

Not exactly quite though. Yeah not much active yes, but I dont like to post just for the sake of it. None of my posts has been "fluff" or off topic. I have two suspicions atm, lego and Jazzy.

I already voted lego some days ago with the following
 

So lego votes Jazzy for being inactive (which is understandable), then welcomes and unvotes him before he even posted,  and votes him again for lurking even though Jazzy posted. Something is off - either lego is not able to make up his mind or maybe trying to get the Jazzy lynch wagon going by voting him on/off to test the waters.

 

I tried to poke Jazzy a couple of times but he has ignored me. Other than those nothing stood out to me. 

@brewersalliance, 

[brewersalliance]

Not exactly quite though. Yeah not much active yes, but I dont like to post just for the sake of it. None of my posts has been "fluff" or off topic. I have two suspicions atm, lego and Jazzy.

I already voted lego some days ago with the following
 

So lego votes Jazzy for being inactive (which is understandable), then welcomes and unvotes him before he even posted,  and votes him again for lurking even though Jazzy posted. Something is off - either lego is not able to make up his mind or maybe trying to get the Jazzy lynch wagon going by voting him on/off to test the waters.

 

I tried to poke Jazzy a couple of times but he has ignored me. Other than those nothing stood out to me. 

@brewersalliance, 

thats true, I must have completely missed that post, my bad 

 

I do agree with you on both Jazzy and Legoboy.  I have a feeling that one of them is going to end up being scum.  Lego was trying to paind jazzy as scum by saying Jazzy used the same scum tactics lego used when he was scum for the first time.  However, just because Lego did it does not mean Jazzy did it.  Lego does seem determined to paint jazzy as scum.  so im starting to think either lego is scum or perhaps since we dont know which roles are all in play lego might be an executioner with jazzy as his target

im 60/40 on it right now.  so not sold, but def suspicious 

[Samus]

Unvote Samus (welcome back my boi)

 

Can't even believe you would do this to me, i'm literally shaking right now.

 

I'll see you on discord.

[legoboyvdlp]

First you vote on Jazzy, then you unvote and welcome him, even though he hasn't posted yet. Canik immediately points that out, you make some shady comment about that. Then few hours later Jazzy posts. And just another few hours after that you vote Jazzy again, "for lurking".   How can you vote someone for lurking just few hours after he posts something?

 

 

SBG said that Jazzy was coming, so I had no reason to place a vote for inactivity. 

 

On the other hand, he claimed himself to be lurking, saying something like "a jazzy is always here, but he doesn't know anything about star wars, so he stayed quiet"

Thus my vote

[iSocialism]

Hmmmm, will they buy this a non fluff post, or a fluff post.

[brewersalliance]

Hmmmm, will they buy this a non fluff post, or a fluff post.

here is a nice fluffy stuffed porg for you 

 

[Chaplain of death]

work jerking my schedule all around which is messing with how much sleep I'm getting. been a zombie for a week now. >.>

lots of fluff. the wagon on jazzy was for a lack of posting, hes here now so I'm confused why it appears so many are still voting him. he threw a vote out so hes contributing because otherwise the wagon would just say hes trying to avoid being lynched (aren't we all?)

[LordSunday]

work jerking my schedule all around which is messing with how much sleep I'm getting. been a zombie for a week now. >.>

lots of fluff. the wagon on jazzy was for a lack of posting, hes here now so I'm confused why it appears so many are still voting him. he threw a vote out so hes contributing because otherwise the wagon would just say hes trying to avoid being lynched (aren't we all?)

 

His wagon originally was for his inactivity, but when he showed up his immediate response was the vote for the second most voted person at the time with reason being to start another wagon. That's why I voted for him, but as others have been saying lego's comments and determination to lynch Jazzy is making me more and more suspicious of him

 

Unvote for now... I need to decide more on this

[Lachiton]

Yeah Jazzy's attempt to jump on the lynch wagon of the second most voted person to save himself has put him in the firing line. He did backpedal after the backlash he received. I will wait on him to vote and think about whether to upgrade my suspicion on him with a vote.

[Rhizoctonia]

I'm not sure if jazzy has given up or if the lynch happy mod is just content on getting rid of a new player. 

 

if your going to vote for somebody not posting much, why not isoc. 3 votes. instead Rhizo votes for somebody who posted more then him. hmmm. 

posts*. early morning posts are the best. 

 

 

Yeah, you make a good point there, Robert.

Rhizo, iSoc has the joint lowest posts, but you picked out CoD.
You ignored the 4 people below him, noticeably Lachiton who is usually very active, and iSoc.

It seems you want to shift the weights around or trying to stay low (i am inclined towards the latter)

FoS: Rhizo

Lachiton, your post count is very low compared to your normal behaviour.
Maybe you are in a scum team with newbies and just wants to lay low.
I want to see more of you on here.
But i think you do these blackouts now and then. So i am just gonna leave you at that.

Brewers, SM is ahead of you in post count.
Scuminess detected.

FoS: Brewers

And where is Samus?
He was making a lot of excitement about his comeback, even going to the length of making an entire thread to get others' opinions on it.
Now that the game started, at least he could shoot up now and then.

 

 

Lol

 

I literally called it a wellness check lol, since you know, CoD hadn't posted in like 3-4 days.  And he got a lulz vote on me earlier, I wanted to return the favor.

Also, fyi, CoD had same amount of posts as me, not more and both Lach and Samus had posted hours before i posted so why would I call out them when they had posted just hours before I did?  SM asked where CoD was before I posted, so figured I'd help make him appear.

But mainly it was a lulz vote back at him at his early shot at me.

 

Also MK, take a chill pill.  You've so far voted No lynch, voted Kitkat, FOS Rafay, Voted Sea, FOS me, FOS Brewers, and basically FOS both Samus and Lach, to go along with your other fluff posts.  I'm happy you want to get your post count up by voting or FOS 1/3 of the people in the game D1, but you don't get an award for most FOS's or votes D1.  

[Rhizoctonia]

Also Unvote

 

Since I made CoD appear for SM.

[Jazzy95]

 

First you vote on Jazzy, then you unvote and welcome him, even though he hasn't posted yet. Canik immediately points that out, you make some shady comment about that. Then few hours later Jazzy posts. And just another few hours after that you vote Jazzy again, "for lurking".   How can you vote someone for lurking just few hours after he posts something?

 

 

SBG said that Jazzy was coming, so I had no reason to place a vote for inactivity. 

 

On the other hand, he claimed himself to be lurking, saying something like "a jazzy is always here, but he doesn't know anything about star wars, so he stayed quiet"

Thus my vote

 

 

Well there's not much for me to do besides lurking. It's both my first IRON mafia game and first time interacting with almost all of you. I have nothing to base anything off of other than the 4 pages that came before my post. It's not like I can say, "Oh remember how he acted during that previous game" or "He's usually more talkative." 

 

Admittedly, my vote for Samus came from a lack of fully reading KevinH's first post. I didn't read the part about being able to vote "no lynch." My second mistake was not realizing a majority of votes were not necessary for someone to be lynched, all they needed were 6 votes. My vote wasn't an attempt to lynch Samus, it was an attempt to split the majority enough that no one reached 12 and therefore (I thought) no one would be lynched.

 

But, not reading the rules may be grounds for lynching, so I don't know.