Your argument is not with me... it's with the doctor from Alberta Canada.Though to call it a bad flu... it's a fekkin' horrific flu.
I'm not a doctor... I'm just an American taxpayer that sees that the loudest voices, and the people making all these decisions, have the most to gain from making this a "crisis". Our Democrats here in the USA have a motto... "Never let a good crisis go to waste". Another famous Democrat, after his release from prison, recently said... "Democrats stealing elections is a time honored tradition".
I think we are seeing a lot of this now. I seriously doubt that those flu statistics include anyone who has died from drowning, heart attacks, crushed by an elevator, or car accidents, that just happened to test positive at the time of their demise. I've had this already... and it doesn't measure up to the hype... but it does entertain the sickest power hungry narcissists around us. As they begin to lose their power over us, they will start lashing out with even more hatred the closer this comes to it's inevitable conclusion.
I can only doubt whether he is actually being objective. The current virus is a SARS virus. It is genetically similar. It has very similar pathology, histologically similar, and radiologically similar. Yes, it is safer on an individual basis... the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) had a case fatality rate of around 10% (8098 cases and 774 deaths), while Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) killed 34% of people with the illness between 2012 and 2019 (2494 cases and 858 deaths). Difference here is SARS-CoV2 (covid 19) has a death rate around 2% globally but over 6600x more cases, therefore on a population level more devastating.
A disease with a high kill rate on an individual level if generally quite good for a population level as it often burns itself out quickly (look at ebola). High transmission with fairly low individual kill rates will typically kill more overall. Obviously high transmission and high kill is bad, though if the kill is high enough and fast enough will still typically burn itself out in the early stages.
My issue is with him, but also that what he is saying isn't accurate and feeds a dangerous counter narrative.