Today looks like we are starting to spin with intertia and not a lot of movement, waiting for something to break the gridlock. Velocity didn't post before surgery, so probably gone until Saturday/Sunday. iSoc2 still AWOL.
To be clear I deleted it once I noticed the mistake which was within a 2 minute period. Brewers messaged me on discord about it, which is why I knew he knew.
I am NOT going to explicitly ask you to roleclaim, however at this point the partial information is already out here and affecting our conversation.
Might as well. I am the tracker.
N1 I selected brewers, did not see anything
N2 lilweirdward, did not see anything
N3 lilweirdward again, he selected MK
I selected LWW the second time because he RC'd cop but I didn't see him anything the second night.
I appreciate your elaboration here, as now we can actually examine this for ourselves.
Tracker would indeed follow the model of all the various observation variants being in game - Kevin's Voyeur (see what but not who on someone), Velocity's Watcher (see who but not what on someone), and now DF's Tracker (See target but not action for someone).
Speaking objectively, this is the kind of claim results that someone could fake - your N2 and N3 are both related to an already-dead townie who claimed their results already and cannot dispute your final entry, so basically an excuse for seeing nothing the whole game. As an example of this, MK still suspects Velocity - despite their claim as Vision with the mind stone - because his results are basically nil.
With that said, neither Kevin's D2 claim nor Velocity's D3 claim have produced actionable results either. Kevin was Lynched for his weak claim, and Velocity survived because of his stone role name getting him a second chance.
For completeness I will point out that this does not, strictly speaking, eliminate the possibility that you are a scum JoaT who followed on N1 and did something else on N2 and N3, specifically because your N2 and N3 results are untestable.
Brewers is the main one who confirms your role - both by having observed it initially, and later in today's postings confirming that on N1 he did nothing but claiming he took action on other nights.
So despite the awkwardness of your situation, I think you can be looked at as 90% town - with the remaining 10% being that you and Brewers are somehow in this together; possible but less likely.
So I get email notifications for PMs, hence how I saw it. If anyone has emails for PMs the post from dark fox tracking me would still be in it, as it might be deleted from the thread but the email wouldn’t vanish…
I saw via email dark fox tracked me. If I was scum I def would have killed dark fox night 1 for that. Knowing he was the tracker, he would not still be alive if I was scum.
I did DM dark fox to let him know he did it to try to delete it so scum didn’t see that he was the tracker and kill him.
I was going to use the OOC stuff and explain more but TW told me not to, hence why I was kind of cagey about explaining it.
This does explain quite a bit of your caginess, if TW pushed you to not talk about it. Dropping the 99.9% town clue was enough to eventually bring this all out.
It's dangerous to speculate overly much on scum intentions because you'll end up in logical circles, but I'll game this out since you've proposed a scenario. Your "If I was scum DF would be dead N1 because I knew he was tracker" could be matched by "I knew DF was tracker on N1 but will vet me as town if needed due to my helping him, especially if he doesn't see ME do anything tonight - so we can try for a better target tonight and kill him tomorrow if nothing better claims." That would have indeed been a risky scum play however, as DF could have changed his follow target after his mistake.
Maybe ironic given that it's not presented as your theory, but I put more weight on your saying that Brewers' mindset has changed today over how he thought of you on previous days, as that is a more visible change in stance.
I actually stated in my post that this was the thing that conviced me he was scum. He was on my scum list but I may not have voted for him early until I saw if there were any useful results from night. But the sudden attack out of nowhere right after I posted that I suspect that town is being led to mislynches just confirmed it. He knew I was going to come after him so he jumped in first so that my vote on him looks like a OMGUS.
Okay... you keep giving iSoc2 more and more of a pass here and that concerns me. I dont think this is "gambling" at all, I think he is our strongest candidate.
I am not fully conviced regarding iSoc. It is possible he is one of brewers'scum partners but he did call out lww a couple of times if I remember correctly. The lww/brewers duo looked strange to me on Day 2. It pointed to close coordination to lynch. However scum would not work so openly together also, but maybe they may have thought they will never suspect scum to be working together. Now however, lww has been confirmed town. My theory here is that brewers latched on to a very townie looking player so that he looks townie by association also. A common smart scum tactic.
Might as well. I am the tracker. N1 I selected brewers, did not see anything N2 lilweirdward, did not see anything N3 lilweirdward again, he selected MK
lww may have been role blocked on N2, he said he got not action on Day 2. That explaing why you didnt see lww do anything. Not sure if it was townie roleblocker or scum. Brewers not doing anything on N1 is interesting also. All scum may not have power roles. We have seen every avenger who has died has a power role.
This may be my first mafia game in a while, but sometimes when someone abruptly changes their stance on someone it meant they have new information that they don't want to claim openly but are hoping that their shift will tip others to follow them. After he started attacking you so strongly Imran, I thought that he was about to claim a result that might explain the 'why' - however since then his justifications have primarily appeared to be reading into professional scum tells.
A shift can also happen after mafia get a chance to discuss at night their strategy for the next day, based on whatever information they may have. So either way, it was notable and worth watching for cues or clues.
I really dont get what sort of reaction is making everyone ignore iSoc2's still-unexplained attacks on our cop and long periods of inactivity that match with laying low while wagons build on everyone else. You, Lyner, and Brewers are all seeming to give him a pass here. Given how much Brewers is attacking you I'd hesitate to say you're on the same team - unless this is one HELL of a distancing tactic - but this really doesnt feel like a coincidence to me that people who seem like they would normally attack inactivity as scummy are instead letting it slide.
Probably the only objectively new/useful bit of information out of your post is this final observation that DF claims Brewers did nothing on N1. In a role madness game that's odd. Rattling off some possibilities:
- Per Imran's line of attack later in today's posts, Brewers is scum and had someone else take faction actions for the night so he would seem to be doing nothing
- Brewers is town (or SK) and waited so DF would report him doing nothing. Beyond getting DF to say so, not sure if this makes sense.
- Brewers is town but either couldnt or didnt use his power on N1. Conserving an X-shot skill, limited by even-night modifier, biding his time, etc. What skills make sense to either have such modifiers or NOT using them every possible night?
- Brewers DID take action on N1 but was unobservable for some reason. Scum ninja, a role that doesnt GO anywhere so Tracker can't respond to it, etc?
- Any other ideas?
In order to figure out what's going on between Brewers and Imran/Robert that he has voted between today, this might be how we figure out what is going on.
I saw via email dark fox tracked me. If I was scum I def would have killed dark fox night 1 for that. Knowing he was the tracker, he would not still be alive if I was scum. I did DM dark fox to let him know he did it to try to delete it so scum didn’t see that he was the tracker and kill him.
Or you didnt kill him to get DF on your side, which would explain the message you sent him, showing him you did a townie thing.
That possibility did not escape me, but there is no way for me to confirm one or the other without sacrificing a night.
It is indeed important to acknowledge things that are not confirmed. It not being confirmed does not make it true or false, just that you have to consider both cases.
There's no way to prove you are not a Godfather.
Short of a full rc, but i get the feeling you would say that it's fake.
How is this any different from me saying that Roberto killed Tony?
Basically the same level of proof backing it up.
Although I am not stretching as much as you.
I clarified by saying I have a "feeling". There is no way to have proof regarding this role. The couple of indications is (i) Cop is present in game -> Mod has to give Scum team some protection for balance and (ii) Brewers did no action on N1 -> fits with Godfather (iii) The game flavor states that Thanos is sending his lieutenants out to kill, in movie also he does this first and only when his lietenants start getting killed off he takes a direct hand in things. There may be some town-themed roles also which are passive so I cannot be 100% sure, but all Avengers that have died so far had power roles.
Imran had an interesting concept that Brewers could be a 'Godfather' scum. Per mafiascum that is a scum role which investigates as innocent if a normal cop targets him, but other types of cop could get their usual results. However Imran appears to be using the term to instead just mean a scum that is sitting back and not being active while the others in their team are using roles/doing kills/etc.
This is very clearly speculation on Imran's part to try and square the "Brewers did nothing on N1 as claimed by DF." It WOULD explain why someone in a role madness game would do nothing on a given night, but per my list above it is also not the only answer to that question. As MK notes here, there is no existing proof that this is the case. It would be an interesting flavor/theme concept though, to have Thanos be a Godfather that the rest of his team would try and preserve - despite Brewers himself very much NOT playing it safe or quiet in the slightest, lol.
Speculation is good to come up with theories that might make sense or hold water to explain other known facts, but like everything else it's unproven until we start linking them to something or have something more solid to hold them up.
Velcoity, the watcher who is as clearly going to watch the cop, was role blocked n3… so it’s pretty safe to assume the role blocker is not town and is scum…. Only way they are town is if they are a world class idiot and that player is not in this game lol
Also trying to put out there that scum has non power roles is a bad notion. If they had non power roles I don’t think this game would be very balanced. Town would have to have multiple vanilla roles to balance it out and that just does not look like it is going to be the case.
And I know you’re gonna say something like “why didn’t you do an action then- it’s cause you’re The Godfather” or something like that.
I am not going to role claim, which you’re probably going to try to press me to do, but I have a power role and I did actions the following nights
I feel safe in saying I have a power role since I highly doubt there are vanilla roles, this is a role madness game.
If vanilla roles are in play, for it to be balanced, nearly every unknown role left would have to be vanilla for the game to be balanced. And we know there is still one stone left in play (soul stone) and I doubt a VT has a stone lol
Brewers states here that he did actions on following nights. If this is accurate it suggests Brewers has a role that for some reason doesn't make sense to use every night, and not just an even-night modifier.
- With DF not dead, if Brewers is scum he did so knowing DF /could/ be tracking him again, though maybe less likely for a repeat of the same target.
- My first thought was some sort of SK or Vigilante, but we have not seen a 2-kill night... so unless one of these nights was actually a scum kill blocked and Brewers' kill getting through (or Brewers' kill blocked and scum kill continuing as normal), I'm not sure Brewers can be a vigilante. I'm not sure how the blocking would happen either; our Doctor died on N1 and while Zacch protected Imran and Velocity on N2/N3 respectively, if Brewers-as-Vig-or-SK tried to kill them at that time it would have resulted in Zacch dying.
- ... I cant think of any other roles that would make sense to not use every night if you have them.
Brewers does not need to claim unless he wants to, but pulling this thread of "not active on N1 but active on other nights" it is difficult to think of what town-aligned roles he COULD be.
Maybe ironic given that it's not presented as your theory, but I put more weight on your saying that Brewers' mindset has changed today over how he thought of you on previous days, as that is a more visible change in stance.
This doesnt really make much sense. My thoughts on D3 had my scum list as Robert, Velocity and Jazzy. And then Velocity RCd and I said I would have to change my scum list and you said the same thing...(u miught have said it first). Then Jazzy flipped town... So obviously the scum suspects needed to change since Robert wasnt going to be the only scum in the game haha. Not sure how going back through the game to try to figure out who is actually scum would be considered scummy lol If anything, thats your number one responsibility as a townie
I never once thought Imran was town. Its not like I went from Imran is Town to Imran is scum. My thoughts on Imran were i wasnt sure and he could go either way. It wasnt until today (D4) that imran said something that jumped off the page as super scummy to me. I then did a deep dive and went back through his posts and put everything he said to a test - "If Imran was scum why would he say this" versus 'If Imran was town why would he say this" and a ton of stuff jumped off the page to me as scummy.
So thats why I changed from "not sure" on imran to thinking he is scum.
If youre wondering, Robert is still on my list, so I havent changed on him
You indeed never said Imran was town, but went more from neutral to attack. I somewhat covered this above earlier in this post - TLDR for the repeat I was thinking your change in stance could either be sign of new investigation information you were trying to convey without a claim or a scum strategy change - either one merited more possible attention. For clarity, paying attention to you does not mean I am calling the behavior scummy - I've been mostly open about my theories where I have them.
I am obviously with you on having had to rewrite my suspect list for D4, after the multi-claim end to D3 upended it. Per earlier iSoc2 remains my main focus, perhaps with more emphasis now than before, and the rest of my list is public as well.
Okay... now I'm current again.
DF's claim has answered one question between him and Brewers, and raised another that will be up for Brewers to answer if he wants to. I'm not sure if it will help us at all, but right now i'm looking for any new information that may alter this limbo state. What strikes me the most is wondering exactly what kind of role Brewers could have that both fits the known facts and isnt some form of scum.
I do NOT want to immediately start accusing Brewers because there could very easily be a role I'm not aware of/not thinking of that would explain everything, so I'm putting the question out to everyone, especially the mafia veterans here - what TOWN role could explain the facts as presented?
If we can think of a hypothetical town role for Brewers that explains everything (without him needing to claim), we go back to status quo. If we CANNOT think of one, then that will make him start to appear more scummy by elimination. So... thoughts?