1065 replies to this topic

[CanucksDynasty]

[color="orange"]MOLE'S UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT


@CanucksDynasty - Any particular reason for wanting to turn the heat up?

Just to get discussion going on D1 instead of D2.
D1 is normally blase.
It seemed to be stalling so I decided to place my vote where it can be of some use.

Right now...it is easier for scum to hide their votes, place a distancing vote, fly under the radar, etc.
Preferably, I would like it to narrow down to 2 people instead of having votes all over the place.

[Martino]

It's not my fault I'm more active. You can't blame me for posting whenever there's a discussion or query. At least I'm not like others here who just lurk - people I see reading but not posting. I don't blame them also if they don't want to post yet (might be they have nothing to say or they are lying low) but don't blame me either if I reply immediately and to even minute posts.

Plus, my musings don't preclude them from answering your question anyways. It's not as if me posting would stop them from responding or stop you from still asking them. Push your question on Kazio if you want but I'll give my opinion whenever I deem it fit.

Lastly, at least, also, I'm not like others who give very short responses... and votes without a rationale, save maybe an ambiguous statement.

While being active is a good thing, clearing up accusations directed at others is not. Let's just assume for a moment that Kazio is scum. Now, he could have of course come up with the explanation you gave himself. However, there is also the possibility that he could not have made up a decent explanation. In the first case, your post did not change much, but in the latter you've given him an out. Basically, we are not gaining all the information we could if you clear up trouble for other players. No matter how logical your post is.

[Sir Jesus]

While being active is a good thing, clearing up accusations directed at others is not. Let's just assume for a moment that Kazio is scum. Now, he could have of course come up with the explanation you gave himself. However, there is also the possibility that he could not have made up a decent explanation. In the first case, your post did not change much, but in the latter you've given him an out. Basically, we are not gaining all the information we could if you clear up trouble for other players. No matter how logical your post is.

I never looked at it that way..

[CanucksDynasty]

I never looked at it that way..

I made the same mistake before.
You learn with the more games you play.

[angel of doom]

thats why i dont stick my neck out for anyone unless i really feel they are a townie, always let people speak for themselves just incase they slip up and reveal something

[Kaziocore]

@Kaziocore - Could you please explain why you felt the need to excuse Carl Vincent's actions on P3?

I don't know. I just felt like helping a first timer after I read in the wiki that it says that random voting worries or confuses new players.

[Falzis]

I never looked at it that way..

I'm highly doubting this. You, an expert, who was able to analyze the power roles of townies exactly in the previous game?

[Falzis]

I don't know. I just felt like helping a first timer after I read in the wiki that it says that random voting worries or confuses new players.

So why did you give an OMGUS vote?

[Kaziocore]

No reason at all. It was really random...
I just played along or something.

[CanucksDynasty]

Wow, page 3 already...

Vote: Angel of Doom

Doom = Bad
Bad = Scum

@SJ - was this supposed to be an actual vote?
Cuz it's not bolded if it was.

[KevinH]

And yes, I would rather you use a random vote, then no vote at all.

So be it.

Living citizens of Arcanus:

1. Falzis
2. Theophilos
3. molestargazer
4. Electric Mango
5. KevinH
6. junkahoolik
7. Martino
8. CanucksDynasty
9. angel of doom
10. Sir Jesus
11. Carl Vincent
12. Kaziocore

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Theophilos

Theophilos doesn't have any votes yet and he might be scum.

[Falzis]

I'd rather you stick to your guns than give a token vote.

[CanucksDynasty]

So be it.



Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Theophilos

Theophilos doesn't have any votes yet and he might be scum.

That's surpising.

[junkahoolik]

That's surpising.

why do you say that??

[CanucksDynasty]

why do you say that??

Cuz it's rare for KevinH to vote on D1 and so soon since deadline is nowhere near.
It is odd cuz we've (in the past) made similar pleas and he seldom changes his No Lynch stance.

[angel of doom]

Cuz it's rare for KevinH to vote on D1 and so soon since deadline is nowhere near.
It is odd cuz we've (in the past) made similar pleas and he seldom changes his No Lynch stance.

he's right, so yea it is strange

[junkahoolik]

meh... is it me or is the game starting to stall??

[CanucksDynasty]

meh... is it me or is the game starting to stall??

Yes it is.
That's why I switched my vote to Falzis in order to generate more discussion.
However, that hasn't happen since Falzis is no where near being lynched.

[Falzis]

Maybe that's because two of the votes on me are random and your reason isn't really solid either.

It's really hard to lynch on D1 as I've learned from the previous game. Does anyone have a clear and sound suggestion as to how to fish out scum on D1? Because it's very easy to be misled. =.=

[Sir Jesus]

I'm highly doubting this. You, an expert, who was able to analyze the power roles of townies exactly in the previous game?

As flattering as that is, I definitely am still learning the ropes. I previously thought that clarification and understanding of logic and argument was the most important. However it is the conetxt, not the content, in which one can draw a more solid conclusion.