Sorry, it's my fault for not communicating better. Narsis probably understands the humor, having known me in real life for a while, LOL...

 

Uh, why FOS CD? Do I have to tell you? Again, I'm information gathering.

 

And how will you gather information by just putting there FOS?

So I guess I can't add humour to my posts??

 

And yes...I was surprised that on literally the first day there were 2 x 2 votes on the same person.

That hasn't happened in a looooong time since I've played mafia.

Was I saying people should settle down and to stop voting.

NO. That was something you assumed.

 

And come on...you've played mafia enough to know that mafia don't defend one another on D1.

 

I don't mind being questioned cuz that should be the townies purpose during the day.

 

as Kazoicore said it's tough to detect sarcasm/humor over a forum.

 

also you are correct. it was Windblade who said to settle down. nonetheless...the way you worded your post makes it seem as though you think that the town was/is moving too fast.

 

 

lastly, i've played mafia long enough to know that they can and will do anything. i'm not saying you and Windblade are mafia, those are your words not mine, however i do want to figure out the thought process behind what you and Windblade are doing. whether mafia or not, it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.

Kaziocore, you will see, as the game progresses.

 

As for Narsis (it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.), I agree with you.

No-one is in the prod range.

 

VOTE COUNT

Kaziocore (2): CanucksDynasty, AKCPLUTO

AKCPLUTO (1): Kaziocore

Falzis (1): Theophilos

CanucksDynasty (1): Falzis

Theophilos (1): Aquinas

 

Not Voting (3): Nerau, Windblade, Narsis

 

With 9 Alive, 5 is needed to lynch.

Just an update from me, due to the lack-ish nature of my posts >_<

 

It's the weekend, which means more time for me so I'll post more later today

 

Cause I thought you're not posting that much because you're scum again :/

Yeah, one day, I'll get even with Theo for tricking me, last game, LOL.

Just another couple of days and I can post back like my old self

Vote: Theophilos

 

He is probably a repeat offender.

 

Pfffft, that's probably the scumiest thing in all the posts so far. Going after an innocent townie, cause of a previous game

 

I'd like to point out Aquinas that that Theo killed him seld at the end >_<

 

Anyhoot, I feared I missed too much but I see I haven't.

 

So Narsis suspects CD & Windblade and AKCPluto somewhat supports Narsis; anything else

 

I still think Aquinas is too quiet FOS Aquinas.

it seems that everyone's been quiet. must have been the weekend.

it twas

 

So Narsis suspects CD & Windblade and AKCPluto somewhat supports Narsis; anything else

 

this is all about i have so far

I don't support Narsis, per se. I just agreed with a few statements he made with regard to information gathering and strategy.

 

As for CD, I'm kinda split between two opinions: him and Kaziocore. Hmm....gotta mull this one over a bit more.

as Kazoicore said it's tough to detect sarcasm/humor over a forum.

 

Fair enough.

 

also you are correct. it was Windblade who said to settle down. nonetheless...the way you worded your post makes it seem as though you think that the town was/is moving too fast.

 

That is your opinion.

 

lastly, i've played mafia long enough to know that they can and will do anything. i'm not saying you and Windblade are mafia, those are your words not mine, however i do want to figure out the thought process behind what you and Windblade are doing. whether mafia or not, it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.

 

Indeed (in regards to "will do anything"), I never seen bussing until it was used in the past couple of games.

As for Windblade and myself...there is no correlation.

I see you trying to link us up...but there is nothing there to link up.

 

Much like I can suggest that you (Narsis) and AKCPLUTO are acting buddy-buddy that you might be linked.

My list/thoughts...

 

Townies

CD

Windblade (somewhat coming to my defense...not necessary if he was mafia).

 

Unknown

Nerau

Kaziocore

Falzis

AKCPLUTO

Theophilos

Narsis

Aquinas

 

Since there are 2 mafia...we can afford 2 mis-lynches.

IF we are unsuccessful in preventing a nightkill...then D3 will result in a LYLO situation.

Fair enough.

 

 

 

That is your opinion.

 

 

 

Indeed (in regards to "will do anything"), I never seen bussing until it was used in the past couple of games.

As for Windblade and myself...there is no correlation.

I see you trying to link us up...but there is nothing there to link up.

 

Much like I can suggest that you (Narsis) and AKCPLUTO are acting buddy-buddy that you might be linked.

 

however i am in no way defending AKC, and neither him me. although we may agree partially on a particular issue, agreeing and defending are two very different things. me and mafia could agree that killing an SK is a good thing. but neither will defend the other if push comes to shove(i'm assuming that the townie thinks that the mafia is mafia). however the situation with you and Windblade defending each other means one of: 1) you are both scum defending each other, 2) one is scum and the other is townie but the townie thinks the scum is townie and the scum is trying to look townie by supporting a townie, or 3) both are townie and think each other is townie.

 

the main constant is that you and Windblade are acting as if you are both on the same side, whether you are or aren't.

I don't support Narsis, per se. I just agreed with a few statements he made with regard to information gathering and strategy.

 

As for CD, I'm kinda split between two opinions: him and Kaziocore. Hmm....gotta mull this one over a bit more.

 

Indeed thus I said "somewhat"

See posts 43-44. He said: "all i'm doing is putting some pressure on and getting info." I said: "Exactly, Narsis."

 

See posts 52-53. I said: "As for Narsis (it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.), I agree with you."

 

To reiterate: I agree with some statements that Narsis has made. I am trying to gather information, just like he is.

 

Narsis, post 64: "however i am in no way defending AKC, and neither him me. although we may agree partially on a particular issue, agreeing and defending are two very different things." I agree. I am supporting Narsis, if by supporting, you mean agreeing. But as I say, and as he has said, we are not defending each other - that is, against accusations.

 

So, again, the point is that I agree with these three statements that Narsis has made. Nothing more. Nothing less.

 

 

 

however i am in no way defending AKC, and neither him me. although we may agree partially on a particular issue, agreeing and defending are two very different things. me and mafia could agree that killing an SK is a good thing. but neither will defend the other if push comes to shove(i'm assuming that the townie thinks that the mafia is mafia). however the situation with you and Windblade defending each other means one of: 1) you are both scum defending each other, 2) one is scum and the other is townie but the townie thinks the scum is townie and the scum is trying to look townie by supporting a townie, or 3) both are townie and think each other is townie.

 

the main constant is that you and Windblade are acting as if you are both on the same side, whether you are or aren't.

 

 

All are possiblities.

And good on you for continuing to press the issue.

 

Personally...I think it's either option 2 or 3 (cuz I'm townie ).

 

See posts 43-44. He said: "all i'm doing is putting some pressure on and getting info." I said: "Exactly, Narsis."

 

See posts 52-53. I said: "As for Narsis (it's all a piece of the puzzle and we are better off solving it then not.), I agree with you."

 

To reiterate: I agree with some statements that Narsis has made. I am trying to gather information, just like he is.

 

Narsis, post 64: "however i am in no way defending AKC, and neither him me. although we may agree partially on a particular issue, agreeing and defending are two very different things." I agree. I am supporting Narsis, if by supporting, you mean agreeing. But as I say, and as he has said, we are not defending each other - that is, against accusations.

 

So, again, the point is that I agree with these three statements that Narsis has made. Nothing more. Nothing less.

 

 

You may be agreeing with Narsis on a few points but you are hardly putting any pressure.

You are not asking the tough questions thus you are not gathering information.

I never said you two defended each other...I said "buddy-buddy" (like agreeing with some of Narsis points).

 

Trying to look townie by saying "I agree"??

Ah, the buddy-buddy thing? I misunderstood that. Alright.

 

Well, I'm not agreeing for any reason in particular? We happen to have the same goals in mind - winning. Hehe.

 

Well, Narsis, why should I not believe you are scum? CD, why aren't YOU scum?

Ah, the buddy-buddy thing? I misunderstood that. Alright.

 

Well, I'm not agreeing for any reason in particular? We happen to have the same goals in mind - winning. Hehe.

 

Well, Narsis, why should I not believe you are scum? CD, why aren't YOU scum?

 

I can say the same to you as well.

Why aren't you scum?

 

Point is...it's D1 and there is no difiintive proof of a person's towniness/scumminess.

We get people to start posting alot and hope to see if someone makes a slip-up.

 

If you are so inclined to believe that I am scum...then vote for me.

I will vote for whomever I think is scum.

 

Kaziocore has my vote but it was a random D1 vote and is currently a placeholder until I find someone worth voting for.

Huh, I will keep that in mind, CD.

 

Kaziocore has my vote but it was a random D1 vote and is currently a placeholder until I find someone worth voting for.

 

Right. I agree. LOL!

@Falzi/Aquinas - would like your input on things so far.

@Falzi/Aquinas - would like your input on things so far.

 

I would also be interested in hearing what Windblade has to say.

I would also be interested in hearing what Windblade has to say.

 

 

Someone made a connection between me and CD, think it was you that we both could be scum because I defended him. I've said in an earlier post why I defended him. Don't want that a townie will be lynched due to suspicions of one person and that the others bandwagon on the votes as they don't have another target.

 

Would say that you're a bit suspicious as you seem to try to make a clear divide between the players and forcing them to pick a side. But you're could be also just be trying to get this thread active. I hope the latter is the case.

 

 

 

Also RL is a bitch atm. Last weekend I celebrated my birthday ( ) and currently I don't have much time due to RL obligations. Can already say that tomorrow and Thursday will won't be able to post here as I have to work next to my internship. I'll promise to post a big post on Friday which is just in time for rule 10.

 

10. If you haven't posted in 3 days, I'll prod you. If you don't pick up that prod AND post within 48 hours, I'll replace you.

 

You won't poke me!

Aquinas - Last Seen: 9th April 2010 :[