An evil overlord, an out of the way town, a strange death, and a suppressed power...all the makings of a good story. Unfortunately, this isn't that town, nor are you those lucky few to go on the world saving adventure. But that doesn't mean that a story of some note isn't about to take place...

 

 

Hey uh...sorry i'm a little late getting this all out. I was really really really busy yesterday. I'll get everything together and throw it all out like now.

 

 

The Players

 

1. Theophilos, rich merchant, inheritor of a vast information ring, and Deputy, was imprisoned and sentenced to beheading Day 2.

2. KevinH, wealthy merchant, head of a vast information ring, and Cop, was found cut and poisoned during Night 1.

3. AKCPluto, wealthy merchant, evil and cunning murderer, and member of the "Mafia", was stabbed to death Day 1.

4. Kaziocore, wealthy merchant and Townie, lynched Day 3.

5. CanucksDynasty, wealthy merchant and member of the "Mafia", survives to end-game.

6. Electric Mango, wealthy merchant and Townie, killed by CD in end-game.

7. Martino, wealthy merchant and Townie, was stabbed to death Night 2.

Edited June 24, 201016 yr by Narsis

7v3 would be the same as 5v2 in that 2 mislynches will lose if the mafia succeeds with night-kills.

One extra player making a total of eleven makes a difference and allows an extra mislynch before the town loses.

 

5v2:

Day 1: mislynch

Night 1: kill

Day 2: mislynch --> game over

 

8v3:

Day 1: mislynch

Night 1: kill

Day 2: mislynch

Night 2: kill

Day 3: mislynch --> game over

So what you are saying is that we should lynch because we will lose when we mislynch twice? Now, I agree with lynching. But I still don't see the difference between this game and another one in that respect.

 

 

unvote: KevinH

vote: Martino ~ Thanks CD, I'm a little rusty.

 

The reason for the vote on Martino was to get someone to two votes to see what would happen. He was the only person that I had any real experience in dealing with and felt I could better judge the results than if I had picked someone I was not familiar with.

 

I believe it is far too early to get someone to 2 votes just to prevent a no lynch. We still have a few days.

unvote: KevinH

vote: Martino ~ Thanks CD, I'm a little rusty.

 

The reason for the vote on Martino was to get someone to two votes to see what would happen. He was the only person that I had any real experience in dealing with and felt I could better judge the results than if I had picked someone I was not familiar with.

 

And what are your feelings so far?

 

 

I believe it is far too early to get someone to 2 votes just to prevent a no lynch. We still have a few days.

 

I would have to agree with Martino on this one. We have 3 days left (including today). I generally don't see much panicking until it's closer to deadline.

 

 

BTW...I won't be as active on Thursday and Friday. I have those days off to prepare for my daughter's birthday on Saturday. So I'll be busy. I'll try to sneak some time in to catch up (most likely during the night).

So what you are saying is that we should lynch because we will lose when we mislynch twice?

 

In other games with more players, an argument can be made to let the cop do his work and improve the odds when lynching. With only two mislynches to give, we can't afford the wait.

 

I think it's better to lynch and hope to get lucky rather than let the scum pick off a few townies.

In other games with more players, an argument can be made to let the cop do his work and improve the odds when lynching. With only two mislynches to give, we can't afford the wait.

 

I think it's better to lynch and hope to get lucky rather than let the scum pick off a few townies.

Well, not lynching twice would get us to 3 townies and 2 scum. So we could still make it to D3 that way, but I suppose you mean that you don't want to no lynch into a Lylo situation.

Let me twist your words ...

 

not lynching twice would get us ... to D3

 

There's the case for no-lynch!

 

(I will still vote to lynch on D1)

Let me twist your words ...

 

 

 

There's the case for no-lynch!

 

(I will still vote to lynch on D1)

Well, that was more or less my point. Are you voting for a lynch because we would otherwise be forced to a Lylo situation where there is no information at all? Or is there another reason.

While I see the point for a no-lynch (never thought I'd say that >.<), I don't think we can loose that much by Day 1 lynch.

I don't think it will ever get to a no-lynch on D1 since the mod states that 2 votes are required for a lynch at deadline.

Currently that would be Martino (the only one with 2 votes).

Let me make it very clear that I am not saying we should go for a no lynch. I'm only in favor of a no lynch in an endgame situation with an even number of players.

 

However, I was just wondering what exactly made KevinH decide to go for a lynch this time around.

Let me make it very clear that I am not saying we should go for a no lynch. I'm only in favor of a no lynch in an endgame situation with an even number of players.

 

However, I was just wondering what exactly made KevinH decide to go for a lynch this time around.

 

Yeah...I understood what you meant.

 

KevinH did that last game too (he turned out to be townie).

So I'm not quite sure what to make of it.

Pinky of Suspicion to KevinH.

It's never too early to apply pressure, I'm trying to get the most impact with the least amount of posts. I'll be watching.

Are you voting for a lynch because we would otherwise be forced to a Lylo situation where there is no information at all? Or is there another reason.

 

The cop would get 2 investigations so it's more than no information but no, there is no other reason.

 

Pinky of Suspicion to KevinH.

 

OMGUS. Why?

 

It's never too early to apply pressure, I'm trying to get the most impact with the least amount of posts. I'll be watching.

 

I think that post is oxymoronic.

Pinky of Suspicion to KevinH.

 

Explain

We're not even sure if there's a cop...

Yeah...I understood what you meant.

 

KevinH did that last game too (he turned out to be townie).

So I'm not quite sure what to make of it.

Good, maybe we've finally convinced him . Anyway, we are getting close to deadline so its time to get rid of my random vote.

 

unvote

 

A no lynch is not an option, so I'm voting for the one who I feel has contributed the least:

 

vote AKCPLUTO

His only contribution was a POS with no explanation.

Vote: AKCPLUTO

 

He's as good a choice as any.

Besides, he pointed his pinky at me.

I put my pinky out in light of Kevin changing his strategy, and going for a lynch this time around. It's only a pinky - nothing serious. In other words, I'm agreeing with Martino.

 

When is the deadline, again?

We're not even sure if there's a cop...

 

I would think there is a cop ... t'would be kinda unbalanced if there wasn't one.

The "There is a Mod Here " VC:

 

AKCPluto: 3 - (Kaziocore, Martino, KevinH)

Martino: 2 - (Theophilos, Electric Mango)

Electric Mango: 1 - (CanucksDynasty)

 

Not Voting: 1 - (AKCPluto)

 

 

Also as a reminder the deadline will be whenever i get around to it Saturday morning(i.e. the morning of the 12th).

Vote: Martino for overreacting to a pinky of suspicion.

Vote: Martino for overreacting to a pinky of suspicion.

 

 

.....and not because it puts both of you at 3 votes?

Well, that's extra.

Unvote

 

I guess my vote is the tie-breaker.

Between the two I would have to....

 

Vote: AKCPLUTO

 

Little reasoning for his suspicions is a bit scummy for my taste.

8. After someone has been lynched, discussion may continue until the end of the week. However no lynch may be undone during this period.

 

That's a lynch. Any discussion?