I would like to see your motivation for the FOS too, please?

Also how do you quote posts?

There's a reply button.

 

You're missing the bracket in the post you wanted to quote.

 

If you're using your phone like I am (also why I'm not posting essays anymore)...you have to select the post and the reply button will appear (in the IP.Board mobile format).

I will let you guys know my suspicions in the morning because I need to get off because of storms. I hope mole sends me my role PM soon so I can really start playing.

Hey guys - sorry for the delay, getting back to Uni has left me very distracted.

 

I'll get your role PM out later today, I should have a little free time to sort this out.

 

I'll push deadline back a few days for the inconvenience.

Reign of terror is behaving suspiciously. He must be scum!

I'll push deadline back a few days for the inconvenience.

 

so deadline is May 4th?

Reign of terror is behaving suspiciously. He must be scum!

KevinH is so quick to throw out accusations!! He must be scum!!! I am still an observer until I get my role PM! Just didn't want my computer to be wrecked cause of lightning!

Reign of terror is behaving suspiciously. He must be scum!

 

 

Seriously... this is just weird. Either you have a pretty warped sense of humour (which I could appreciate), or you are scum and trying to make it so obvious that we'd all think that no scum would be so stupid, so therefore you cannot actually be scum... despite being it.

Ok, here is my ranking of the scummiest people from my POV.

1. Narsis / AKCPLUTO - To me it seems like posting who you think the scum are with no room for error early on the first day and continuing to stand by it is a very, very strange scummy idea. Especially since he got it wrong! I would vote for AKC, but I want to give him a chance to play.

2. ccabal86 - He was the first person to vote for d3mon even before any serious accusations. He never removed

his vote throughout day 1. He never explained why he voted for d3mon. And as EM said already nerau was night killed after voting for ccabal86.

Tied for 2.CD - CD repeatedly said that he didn't want to lynch n00bs on day 1 one, but still continued to question d3mon's actions throughout day 1 leading to d3mon's lynch. CD is playing an active role if he is scum or townie as he claims.

4. KevinH- I have a weird feeling about him. He voted for a no lynch on the first day, even though hypothetically lynching someone would be the better option for the town. (It didn't turn out that way for us unfortunately) He also said he wants to lynch the inactives. That seems to me like a waste of a lynch cause if they aren't playing the game they have no threat to the town.

5. Cao Cao- He made a lot of n00b mistakes on the first day, but he seems to be inactive and not hurting or helping the town. I think we should see how the prod on him goes before we lynch him.

6. Everyone else

UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

CaoCao (3): Electric Mango, CanucksDynasty, Preston

CanucksDynasty (1): ccabal86

Not Voting (6): nerau, TerrorChrist, CaoCao, KevinH, AKCPLUTO, reign of terror

Interesting takes. Narsis I can see but why Kevin? He was very adamant about not lynching demon. Are you writing that off as a clever scum ploy?

I did see that Kevin defended d3mon and that is why he is lower on my list.

I may have registered in 2009, but this is only my 5th game actually. It took me a while to become aware of mafia. Yes, editing that post wasn't the best idea ever, but as I recall, it was very late and I was quite tired - never realized my mistake untill after it happened. But as mole stated, the game hasn't started yet at that time, and as such game rules didn't apply.

 

As for the quotes, I don't see how they can seem manipulative. In the first one, I merely stated the fact that a quick lynch is not in the town's interest wich I don't think anyone can disagree with. I truly believed there was a risk scum may take advantage of the initial bandwagoning on Kevin and end the day with a quick lynch stripping us from the discussion. Town needs all the discussion time it can get, otherswise, we it can't win.

 

In the second quote I'm arguing for a Day 1 lynch - nothing more, nothing less. Last time I was supporting Day 1 no-lynch, which did happen in the end, and I believe it turned out to be bad strategy. My role turned out to be borderline useless and it's a small miracle we actually lynched a scum based on CD's report, as several others were moving as well.

 

So there is nothing strange about you first arguing AGAINST a lynch, and then for a lynch?

Also, I'd like to make a remark about this game...

 

it's rather confusing, but fun

I have an opinion on your thoughts on ccabal but I'd like him to reply 1st.

 

And yes, this game is very fun. It's my favorite thing to do and without it I would be very inactive. I love figuring out a good mystery and I love it when we get new players. Keep coming back!

Reign of terror is behaving suspiciously. He must be scum!

 

 

To be fair, this is just Kevin being Kevin. Keep playing mafia with us and you'll understand . He marches to the beat of his own drum and besides TC is my other most trusted townie.

 

Mega Catch-Up VOTE COUNT

CaoCao (3): Electric Mango, CanucksDynasty, CaoCao

CanucksDynasty (1): ccabal86

 

Not Voting (6): AKCPLUTO, Preston, KevinH, reign of terror, TerrorChrist, Nerau

Edited April 28, 201115 yr by molestargazer

He never explained why he voted for d3mon.

 

Not true. I explained my d3mon vote here:

 

...

1, I did not "bandwagon" onto d3mon, in fact, it was the very first vote on him. My vote was the same vote I placed on him jokingly, but as he acted more and more suspicious (at least from my point of view), i became more and more convinced that my vote was well placed.

...

 

 

So there is nothing strange about you first arguing AGAINST a lynch, and then for a lynch?

 

I was arguing against a QUICK lynch, not a lynch altogether. Big difference.

To be fair, this is just Kevin being Kevin. Keep playing mafia with us and you'll understand . He marches to the beat of his own drum and besides TC is my other most trusted townie.

Ok, I will trust you on that. @ccabal86 I am so sorry, I didn't see that post! My mistake!

That's good to shake people down like that though. It's good to see how people react under pressure. CD is really good at playing the bad cop but seemed to lose his wind coming into Day 2. Not his normal behavior which makes me a little more suspicious of him

 

Anyway, keep up the aggressive style. Voting also can turn up the heat real quick. It not only pressures our must suspicios players but also forces people to cement their position and not sit on the fence being wushu washy.

Wishy washy. Itouch auto corrects a lot of slang words.

Ok, I want to know why EM, CD and Preston think voting out an inactive (Cao Cao) will further the town in any way.

I think that whether he's active or inactive, he's the most suspicious out of everyone. Reasons are as follows:

 

Placed 4th vote on Kevin - probable townie

 

FOSd TC - Lifeguard

 

FOSd Kevin later that day

 

Voted d3mon - Security Guard

 

 

No one else has a worse track record.

I think that whether he's active or inactive, he's the most suspicious out of everyone. Reasons are as follows:

 

Placed 4th vote on Kevin - probable townie

 

FOSd TC - Lifeguard

 

FOSd Kevin later that day

 

Voted d3mon - Security Guard

 

 

No one else has a worse track record.

I agree that that is a bad track record, but personally I think most of those are newbie mistakes.

I keep forgetting that I have to explain my jokes here.

 

Since Reign of Terror didn't even know his own alignment, it would be tough to be either pro-town or pro-scum. I don't really think he is suspicious.

 

With everything else being equal, lynching the inactive means that an active player survives to help the town in the next day.

 

I liked EM's analysis of the case against Cao Cao. Cao Cao will get my vote unless somebody convinces me otherwise.

 

I was arguing against a QUICK lynch, not a lynch altogether. Big difference.

 

Please explain...?