I'm 100% sure that is not the case, because I'm a townie 
Anyway it all seems to boil down to CD or AKC, with possibly EM as a possible second mafia member? Since we haven't learned that much in the past few days I think what everyone should do now is put a FoS on the person you'd vote for if you had to vote RIGHT NOW. Maybe that will spark some discussion.
If I had to vote RIGHT NOW I'd vote for AKC, with CD as a backup. AKC increasingly looks like he got caught in a bad roleclaim when TC revealed the name difference, plus the start-of-day vote and accusing TC yesterday don't help him any. CD has his voting record against him, having lynched both d3mon and cao cao. I'm leaning towards AKC at present, but I think it's dangerous for us to completely disregard the day 1 votes: that's one of the few solid pieces of information we have, and at this point we're down to two names.
I am also not ruling out the possibility that BOTH CD and AKC are scum, and that they are setting up for a sacrifice today that will 'prove' one of them town for tomorrow. Remember that even if we succeed today, it will STILL be LYLO tomorrow unless scum's nightkill is blocked.
FOS-Preston
If CD and ccabal aren't lying, and AKC is lying that would leave AKC, Preston, and EM to be scum. Also Preston has not been challenged at all this entire game. Preston also voted for d3mon and then backed off quickly after d3mon roleclaimed as the security guard. Seems like something a scum would do because he doesn't want to have a deciding vote on one of the town's leading roles.
We're down to few enough players that "take X away, remaining 3 must be scum" arguments are possible. However we don't have anything on which to base the assumption that both CD and ccabal aren't lying - those are the remaining two from the list that voted for d3mon on day 1, and the prevailing wisdom yesterday was that d3mon's vote must have included at least ONE scum, if not more.
You are also forgetting that on day 1 just prior to the end of the day, KevinH was strongly asking people to unvote so we could figure out a way to test d3mon. I did that, and was talking about asking mole for an extension of the day to give us some time to do just that when the day ended. I could have easily stuck with the bandwagon (and frankly my analysis at the time was saying that I SHOULD have), but the danger of losing our security guard made me second guess myself.
@Pres - what are your thoughts on TC vote on EM?
TC first stated his suspicion of EM on day 1, and I was never clear on what he based that suspicion on - he mentioned EM's accusations, but aside from the usual day 1 scrambling (particularly with Kevin's april fools joke) I didn't see EM stand out of the crowd by the time TC first mentioned being suspicious of him. TC's vote today appears to be just a continuation of that first suspicion as opposed to something based on more current events - kinda like what CD does when he sticks on someone after first finding them suspicious.
I don't begrudge him his suspicion (and he may even be correct) but I think it's more of a long shot with less evidence behind it than the other candidates we're currently looking at. I'd rather a solid target instead of a guess from behavioral information like we did on day 1.
All right, I guess that makes sense, it is LYLO after all. But even if we miss here we may have a (however slim) chance of living another day...
I'm a Restroom Attendant. I can "lock" people in the restroom for a night, preventing any action by that player to be carried out. The player I lock in, can't be nightkilled either. It's also unused - I was saving it for a LYLO situation as a last straw.
Well this is interesting - and a little surprising that it's still unused, if real. I don't know how many roles there are left in this game... but I wonder if there is a way we can test this. Unlike AKC's role, this one has an active instead of passive ability.
First analysis:
This is basically a bodyguard role that roleblocks the one they protect, while the martyr (I think?) is a bodyguard role that dies if their target is attacked. They dont overlap, but they're close.
We've also already seen a simple 'roleblocker' - but that's more intended to be used against potential scum, where this role appears to be intended to protect but limit a townie; imagine if it were used on the security guard on night 1!
I don't want to immediately call this role fake, but it fits neatly between two roles we've already seen. I could see mole having a role like this in there as an attempt at limiting the town - two docs, but one blocks abilities and the other sacrifices the doc on successful use.
This role would be far more probable in a game where there are no vanilla townies - and so far we have yet to see any. Given that we have SIX town abilities in the game thus far, (four dead, TC and myself - I am not vanilla townie), I am not sure I'd believe that BOTH are vanilla.
-Preston
Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top
