638 replies to this topic

[AngelCruzdelaSant]

Well, I'm back guys, Seems like a large number of posts was about gender and disorders etc.

I'm a girl and an anorexic. Apparently I am afraid of dieticians trying to feed me.

[Xx Karl xX]

woops....meant:
FOS: Alternate_tree

[Xx Karl xX]

woops....meant:
FOS: Alternate_tree

[Xx Karl xX]

grr...and a double post...my bad

[BeeBs]

I was hoping to avoid a no lynch tonight. It was a good strategy on Day 1 (gave us the info that there are likely 2 anti-town factions), but we should no longer sit on our asses. Especially if we have a serial killer.

Vote: Rafay

Why him? He's jumping votes and fails to give a reason for them despite my asking.

True. However, I think that is just Rafay, not an indication of his scumminess, but I suppose that is similar to what we all said last time...
While he's changed votes, he hasn't been obnoxious or trying to get bandwagons to much about it, so I don't think he is worthy of a vote.

Nerau seemed like as good a candidate as any to lynch. We obtained the voting subtleties when he was the prime candidate.
When Eva999 replaced Nerau, that changed nothing regarding the affiliation of the character.

I disagree. I tried to explain reasoning for that in an earlier post. However, you're not going to get a second vote from me. While it might tempt me more in a later game if you're otherwise implicated, you're entitled to your opinion here.

[KevinH]

Posts made in Day 2:

17 KevinH
15 cam177
11 ccabal86
9 Electric Mango
9 Rafay
9 Xx Karl xX
8 Daimos
6 BeeBs
6 OrangeRush7
3 Alternate_Tree
3 reign of terror
2 ABigDeer
2 Angel Cruz dela Sant
2 Eva999 / Nerau

[cam177]

Honestly we really just need to vote someone this time. Day one no votes provide a bit of tang to the game i admit but since it is clearly each night two people are going to die we need to vote on someone. And i know it seems like i'm being scummy Kevin but honestly i just don't think he is with those trying to bring Sanity to our dear Metropolis. But i do find how you act to be odd how every time i confront you on something you have completely ignored the question.

[Eva999]

Alright, having glanced over the thread a bit now, nothing strikes me as particularly odd except Daimos' first post of the day. You said RIP comrade and only included one of the deaths from last night, why though? No one else seems to have noticed it but it seemed very odd to me at least unless I missed something.

FOS: Rafay as well, he's playing very similarly to last game, throwing out votes with no reasoning which served him very well in the last game, to the towns demise.

Whether or not EM was actually investigated at night I'm not sure, but my own disorder references being investigated so there for sure is some sort of cop role.

The game setup to me right now seems like its insane townies (each with a disorder) versus a sane mafia with maybe a serial killer thrown in for fun.

[KevinH]

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I have been accused of completely ignoring the question every time I am confronted. I present the following exhibits:

KevinH: "I think it was a pro-town player that had to make a night-kill. If somebody had to die, JohnGato the inactive was the best choice for a townie faction and the worst choice for any other faction. However, he was going to be replaced. From a mafia perspective, one dead townie is as good as another."
Cam177: "Im going to have to disagree with you it was stated earlier that the mod we have usually wont replace unless it is a vital town role. So with the info we could pretty well say that he was important to the town or Mafia. Now we look at it further if it was important to the town the mafia now knew this; so with the info we can also say the mafia would of attacked without regard on JohnGato for the simple fact that he was an important role to the town."

Was there a question here? Cam177 incorrectly stated "the mod we have usually wont replace unless it is a vital town role". It's obvious in hindsight that JohnGato didn't have a vital town role. No further discussion needed.

Cam177: "What does our sex matter people can we please get back to the game!!!!"
KevinH: "Three pieces of information were given: •Role •Sex •Method of death. It seems to me that discussing this information is playing the game."

Cam177: "Honestly, it isnt very bright to be telling your roles like that on day two"
KevinH: "Unless I want to make the scum waste a night-kill on me."
Cam177: "Yes but even if you are lying you are screwing over the dang town"
ccabal86: "Not exactly sure what you're trying to do here Kevin. Are you suggesting we should all come out with some role?"
KevinH: "I do not have any special information that makes Nerau a good lynch candidate. I just think that in the absense of any other information, we might as well lynch an inactive. He's just as likely to be scum as anyone else."
Cam177: "Why lynch when we are looking for a replacement"
KevinH: "I don't see a better lynch candidate and I don't think he deserves a pass because he's getting replaced."
Cam177: "Okay, why such a change, when people were about to lynch JohnGato; you were all for waiting for the replacement. Now it is nerau and you are wanting to lynch before we even get a replacement."
Cam177: "KevinH unless you still have logical reason to lynch eva id say unlynch now"
KevinH: "Just because the player changed, it doesn't mean the affiliation of the character changed. If Nerau was worth a vote, then Eva999 is worth a vote. Convince me otherwise."
Cam177: "Convince us why they are worth a vote right now do you have info the town could use or are you hiding the fact that you have plans?"
KevinH: "The only thing I know about Nerau/Eva999 is that they were inactive and are now replaced. Also of interest is the vote and unvote by Rafay and the defenses by Cam177, OrangeRush7, and Beebs. (Are they townies keeping a known townie alive? Or are they scum trying to influence votes away from one of their own?) Nevertheless, I don't see eight votes accumulating to secure a lynch so I'll just welcome Eva999 to the game."

Cam177: "It seems your trying to point fingers. You keep going after people who are inactive which is understandable but when they come back you still want them lynched"

Was there a question here? Note my previous statement that just because the player changed, it doesn't mean the affiliation of the character changed.

Cam177: "Honestly im less concerned with him and more concerned with KevinH. Not to mention when we were going to lynch johngato for inactivity he was all against it because we were getting a replacement but when it came to Eva he wanted to lynch even though we were getting one."
KevinH: "I favor no-lynching on day 1 because nobody knows anything and it's essentially random. I favor lynching on day 2 because somebody knows something and we can use voting subtleties in the future."

KevinH: "Speaking of subtleties, we now have Cam177 redirecting attention away from Rafay and toward me. The plot thickens ..."
Cam177: "And i know it seems like i'm being scummy Kevin but honestly i just don't think he is with those trying to bring Sanity to our dear Metropolis. But i do find how you act to be odd how every time i confront you on something you have completely ignored the question."

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I have been accused of completely ignoring the question every time I am confronted. In fact, I have proven that every confrontation was indeed answered. I rest my case.

[ccabal86]

Alright, having glanced over the thread a bit now, nothing strikes me as particularly odd except Daimos' first post of the day. You said RIP comrade and only included one of the deaths from last night, why though? No one else seems to have noticed it but it seemed very odd to me at least unless I missed something.

Hm, I assumed it's because they were both from NPO, but now that you mention it, it is a bit odd.

[ABigDeer]

@Karl

I have nothing to contribute.

[cam177]

Hm, I assumed it's because they were both from NPO, but now that you mention it, it is a bit odd.

Honestly now i know this is going to sound wrong but just peaking from a pacfican view anywhere we are if a comrade falls we tell them RIP it is just how we are we are very much like a RL family. In saying that i dont know if he was speaking from a pacifican point of view or if he is scum

[KevinH]

ABigDeer says he has nothing to contribute.
I'll make a poem and he can follow suit.

Few posts would make for a boring game.
I make up stories, do the same!

The fun of the game is seeing people lie
Four scum are there, they need to die.

We can play the odds but still be wrong
The scum will lie and play along

Eventually we'll find a scum and kill him dead
Then look back at everything he said

So pick a theme and go for broke
You'll be glad you finally spoke!

[Eva999]

ABigDeer says he has nothing to contribute.
I'll make a poem and he can follow suit.

Few posts would make for a boring game.
I make up stories, do the same!

The fun of the game is seeing people lie
Four scum are there, they need to die.

We can play the odds but still be wrong
The scum will lie and play along

Eventually we'll find a scum and kill him dead
Then look back at everything he said

So pick a theme and go for broke
You'll be glad you finally spoke!

I might have missed it, but are you just guessing that there's 4 scum based on the number of players, or did we get that info at some point?

[KevinH]

I'm just guessing based on an original start with 16 players. 1 out of 4 assigned as scum is a typical setup.

[KevinH]

Townie points:

+1 for not being part of the day 1 lynch attempt on JohnGato
+1 for being active
+1 for getting probed

Most likely to be townie (3 points)

Electric Mango

Probably townie or playing well as scum (2 points)

BeeBs
ccabal86
Eva999
Xx Karl xX

Under scrutiny (1 point)

ABigDeer
Alternate_Tree
Angel Cruz dela Sant
cam177
Daimos
OrangeRush7
Rafay

Most likely to be scum (0 points)

reign of terror

[reign of terror]

Posts made in Day 2:

17 KevinH

Most posts = definite scum.

Most likely to be scum (0 points)

reign of terror

Nice try, but using a biased scale to prove I'm scum doesn't really make logical sense. I'm a vanilla townie with a small power role that doesn't activate until I die.

[Electric Mango]

So you're kind of like Obi Won Kenobi, if the scum strike you down you only become more powerful?

[KevinH]

But he still has much to learn, Master. His abilities have made him, well… arrogant.

[reign of terror]

So you're kind of like Obi Won Kenobi, if the scum strike you down you only become more powerful?

In a way, yes.

But he still has much to learn, Master. His abilities have made him, well… arrogant.

Challenging your views makes me arrogant?