vote: rafay

 

 

 

let the drama ensue.

I find it interesting that Rafay is accumulating votes.

My vote started as a prompt and look what happened...

Of course, somebody needs to be lynched and I don't see a better alternative so I'll leave my vote there.

Progression is awfully slow and this day is uneventful.

I suppose Rafay is not all that active, although I think there is less active people.

To be honest I have no idea why people still have their votes on Rafay and others for such a long time with nothing being added, if anything it shows they're not all that active(except the ones that voted people because they were inactive).

Reign of terror,Nerau, killgor are other alternatives and perhaps somewhat better.

 

Unvote

 

Vote Rafay

unvote
 
I'm quite happy to see Rafay lynched, but L-1 at this point... no. We haven't even heard from Xarastier's replacement.

Quite happy? that is weird and very scummy

 

Unvote

 

Vote Euclid 

Well it sems no one has bothered to understand my explanation. I hope you can understand that I'm not scum and that if I'm lynched, tonight the scum will cause major chaos. I only request that I'm inportant to the town. Can't explain that. But plz understand, rethink and re-vote.

Don't state you're important to the town, if you survive then someone might kill you.

And it could come back to haunt you if you're indeed scum and people could also see it as you're as a scum pleading not to be lynched.

unvote

 

I'm quite happy to see Rafay lynched, but L-1 at this point... no. We haven't even heard from Xarastier's replacement.

 

 

Quite happy? that is weird and very scummy

 

Unvote

 

Vote Euclid 

 

 

I have no problem with L-2 though so...

Vote Rafay

 

Also, lol @Commander Shepard for first putting Rafay at L-1 and then voting me for saying that I'm okay with lynching him. Makes sense. Not.

No you're not ok with lynching with him.

You're happy with lynching him, your potential reasons for being happy with lynching him are worrying considering he has shown no real signs of being scum.

 

It does make sense I voted to lynch him for the reasons I described, sometimes, actually all the time there seems to be some communications problem between me and you where you ignore parts of what I say or reply to my posts with something I was not even discussing such as my first vote on KevinH.

I also like how you're backtracking from "happy with lynching him" to "ok with lynching him".

Yeah I don't trust you at all.

Progression is awfully slow and this day is uneventful.

I suppose Rafay is not all that active, although I think there is less active people.

To be honest I have no idea why people still have their votes on Rafay and others for such a long time with nothing being added, if anything it shows they're not all that active(except the ones that voted people because they were inactive).

Reign of terror,Nerau, killgor are other alternatives and perhaps somewhat better.

 

Unvote

 

Vote Rafay

 

You mentioned that you had reasons to put Rafay at L-1. Are they supposed to be in this quote? Lol at calling the day uneventful just after killgor made his bold move.

 

I'm not backtracking anything. Since we'll have to lynch someone and Rafay seems the most suspect to me it might as well be him. As to your freaking out over happy with versus okay with... whatever, I meant the same thing.

A ) There is not much to post about so townies may just be lurking to see progression, all they have is there vote.

B ) The townies outnumber the scum

C ) Scum are more likely to be actively trying to gain trust among other by "hunting" for scum

You're basically rewarding players to lurk and punishing people who scum hunt

if that's how you think townies should act.

 

Townies shouldn't lurk just to view everyone else talking about stuff.

So who's supposed to create the progression?

 

There's a lot to post about. Like how you completely tunneled me as you have ignored

what Imran has said. You have time to analyze my post but yet you didn't try to

understand Imran's. I think there is something wrong there.

 

---

I would also like to point out how you misrepped me

Encouraging the vote on lurkers which doesn't say much as we have little info to work with.

which I didn't say. If you think that's a scum tell then

I'm doubting if you're even reading what other people

are posting here.

 

---

lol you're saying my reason for suspecting KevinH is weak?

 

Tell me what's weak in voting KevinH because I think his post

was more of information rather than analysis. Scum would

likely post something which seemingly is useful but is not

to look "townie." What's weak in trying to get out of RVS

as early as possible.

 

I don't see how Xarastier's vote and especially yours is better

than mine.

vote: rafay

 

 

 

let the drama ensue.

Any other insight than appearing out of nowhere to vote the biggest wagon right now?

 

Well it sems no one has bothered to understand my explanation. I hope you can understand that I'm not scum and that if I'm lynched, tonight the scum will cause major chaos. I only request that I'm inportant to the town. Can't explain that. But plz understand, rethink and re-vote.

Give us your reads (who you think is town, scum, null at this point) and I may reconsider

but as of now, you're not being pro-town

 

 

Progression is awfully slow and this day is uneventful.

I suppose Rafay is not all that active, although I think there is less active people.

To be honest I have no idea why people still have their votes on Rafay and others for such a long time with nothing being added, if anything it shows they're not all that active(except the ones that voted people because they were inactive).

Reign of terror,Nerau, killgor are other alternatives and perhaps somewhat better.

 

Unvote

 

Vote Rafay

lol scummy move

 

Encouraging the vote on lurkers which doesn't say much as we have little info to work with.

and yet he voted Rafay for the same reason

 

Unvote: Rafay

Vote: Commander Shepard

 

Rafay can probably wait later

This might come shocking but it actually means I voted Rafay because progression is slow, people are not changing votes when they have next to no reason for voting that person, but there seems to be a communications issue between us.

We still have 9 days. There's no need to rush.
I don't even think there's a slow progression.

Xarastier is about to be replaced too as a

replacement has been found

On a side note, we are 5 days into the game and already have 150 posts, good activity guys! Let me know if you guys want the days shorter, if not that's fine I just don't want people to get bored and quit because the day phase was too long.

lol it's their problem if they can't play that long

So what you're saying Commander Shepard is that you're voting Rafay to spur discussion

but not because he is lurking per se? Then why not vote someone else that are more

suspicious to you? Why did you unvote me for instance?

 

Also I would like to know your opinion on Imran. He was for the most part of the game

parking his vote on lurkers. What say you?

 

You're basically rewarding players to lurk and punishing people who scum hunt

if that's how you think townies should act.

 

Townies shouldn't lurk just to view everyone else talking about stuff.

So who's supposed to create the progression?

 

There's a lot to post about. Like how you completely tunneled me as you have ignored

what Imran has said. You have time to analyze my post but yet you didn't try to

understand Imran's. I think there is something wrong there.

 

 

 

I haven't been readin Imran that much.

I think he is voting inactives, I somewhat agree and fine it acceptable.

There is not much to analysis.

 

I'm not rewarding players to lurk, I don't think the Vig should only target lurkers as you suggested he should do.

I think he should target those he find suspicious.

 

 

 which I didn't say. If you think that's a scum tell then

I'm doubting if you're even reading what other people

are posting here.

 

 

lol you're saying my reason for suspecting KevinH is weak?

 

 

Tell me what's weak in voting KevinH because I think his post

was more of information rather than analysis. Scum would

likely post something which seemingly is useful but is not

to look "townie." What's weak in trying to get out of RVS

as early as possible.

 

I don't see how Xarastier's vote and especially yours is better

than mine.

You think my scum tell is weak, I think your scum tell is weak.

 

Generally I think you're using your vote in retaliation.

Your vote on KevinH was weak as hell.

Your vote on Rafay seemed like retaliation and it was weak as hell.

Your vote on me is much the same your vote on Rafay.

 

You quote me post and say "Lol scummy" and then vote me.

It appears almost child like.

I don't consider Rafay a lurker.

So what you're saying Commander Shepard is that you're voting Rafay to spur discussion

but not because he is lurking per se? Then why not vote someone else that are more

suspicious to you? Why did you unvote me for instance?

 

Also I would like to know your opinion on Imran. He was for the most part of the game

parking his vote on lurkers. What say you?

 

Imran was voting inactives, I think that sums it up.

I unvoted you because I got bored and then I voted Rafay.

I find it suspicious Rafay dropped the power role reference and how he is important to the town.

However I will not vote him again as I find yours and Euclid's behavior more suspicious at present.

You still haven't given reasons stating why my reason for voting KevinH is weak so I don't know
 
But objectively speaking, mine is better than this poor excuse to join the early wagon
 

Vote KevinH
 
Someone needs to be lynched

 
You also wrote this when you voted me so that means you should suspect people
voting inactive. But it is definitely suspicious that now you think it's just fine.

You haven't even quoted the part where I said this so you're just misreping me.
 

Encouraging the vote on lurkers which doesn't say much as we have little info to work with.

 

Also please don't use the excuse that I'm scum because I voted you. That's weak.

You're scummy yourself.

I haven't been readin Imran that much.

Commander Shepherd - TUNNELVISION ON

You still haven't given reasons stating why my reason for voting KevinH is weak so I don't know

 

But objectively speaking, mine is better than this poor excuse to join the early wagon

 

Vote KevinH

 

Someone needs to be lynched

 

You also wrote this when you voted me so that means you should suspect people

voting inactive. But it is definitely suspicious that now you think it's just fine.

You haven't even quoted the part where I said this so you're just misreping me.

 

>

Encouraging the vote on lurkers which doesn't say much as we have little info to work with.

 

Also please don't use the excuse that I'm scum because I voted you. That's weak.

You're scummy yourself.

 

 

Your reason for voting KevinH is weak because I see no real reason.

Information over analysis? Ridiculous

 

 

 

 Vote: KevinH

 

And yes. I'm out of RVS.

This is more of information over analysis.

Also he should cast his vote

 

Honestly I think the only good reason as to why you voted him is because he did not cast his vote which is pretty ridiculous in itself.

 

I explained why I voted him over two other posts and to be honest I am new to this.

It was after all my first ever post here.

You're not scum because you voted me, I just generally dislike your approach.

It seems childlike and ridiculous which could imply that you're scum.

 

I mean "Lol scummy" seriously? I don't even know.

 

I haven't been readin Imran that much.

Commander Shepherd - TUNNELVISION ON

 

>Ignores most of my post about Imran and uses selective quotes.

I should not say the only good reason you voted him.

I mean the best reason you gave is because he did not vote yet.

Okay tell me what's ridiculous with IoA? Do you even understand what it is?
You're just saying it's ridiculous without explaining why.
 
Since you're new to this game, this is how normally mafia starts
1. we start with random voting stage (RVS) to spur discussion
2. someone sees someone suspicious (RVS ends)
 
Normally the first wagon dies out eventually so KevinH was in no danger of getting lynched.
I did what I'm supposed to. I find KevinH suspicious so I voted him.
 

---

It's peculiar though how you chose to vote me instead of Xarastier.
It's also peculiar that in your POV, if someone votes ridiculously (which I argue is not)
he's automatically scum. This is peculiar because Xarastier and you yourself had a weak reason that
couldn't even compare to mine but you still didn't suspect Xarastier or thought that
it's a null tell because you also did it.
 
So this is basically you're reasons for voting me
1) you think my vote on KevinH is ridiculous (which is not even a scum tell) ~ not actually present when you voted me
2) i was actively scum hunting (you think mafia would try to be active to divert attention to themselves) ~ basically active people are scummy, lurkers are towny
3) i encouraged the vote on lurkers ~ which is not true and which I even disagreed in Post #76. The fact that he used this reason but ignored Imran even though he voted an inactive means he's tunneling
 

 

 

I haven't been readin Imran that much.

Commander Shepherd - TUNNELVISION ON

 

 
>Ignores most of my post about Imran and uses selective quotes.

 
Oh really? I think you only noticed Imran because I pointed him out to you.
You say you didn't understand his post but if you're not tunneling me,
you would exert more effort there.
 
Also though you also suspect Euclid, it's probably because you're thinking
we're the scum team so indirectly you're still tunneling me.
 
Okay I'll also ignore the fact that you actually ignored most
of my posts too to paint me as scummy.
 

You're not scum because you voted me, I just generally dislike your approach.
It seems childlike and ridiculous which could imply that you're scum.
 
I mean "Lol scummy" seriously? I don't even know.

Okay you generally dislike my approach so that means I'm scum. Cool story bro

Being childlike and ridiculous is also scummy. That's new.

 

---

If you really think I'm scum then I'm cool with a 1v1.

Okay I'll also ignore the fact that you ignored killgor's vote on Rafay. Okay now you're not tunneling.

 

And unvoting me just because you're bored is not a good reason at all