http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/cybernations.png

 

Cybernations Mafia

 
Only the following roles may exist in this game:

Vanilla Townie, Bodyguard, Commuter, Sane Cop, Role Cop, Vanilla Cop, Flavor Cop, Doctor, Friendly Neighbor, Follower, Gunsmith, Innocent Child, Jack of All Trades, Jailkeeper, Mafia Goon, Mafia Encryptor, Mafia Godfather, Mafia Ninja, Mafia Strongman, Mafia Traitor, Mason, Miller, Motion Detector, Neapolitan, Neighbor, Neighborizer, Nurse, Roleblocker, Rolestopper, Serial Killer, Tracker, Universal Backup, Vigilante, Voyeur, Watcher

The following modifiers may also exist in this game:

Ascetic, Backup (with or without primary role present), Bulletproof, Enabler (with or without primary role present), Even/Odd Night, Macho, Neighbor, Non-Consecutive Night, Weak, X-Shot

 

Assigned character names are various alliances from Cybernations. Ignore all current Cybernations foreign relations. The current treaty web has no bearing on the assigned characters. Alliances were randomly assigned as "good" or "bad" roles so one's personal opinion of an alliance will not necessarily translate to this game.
 

Sample Role PM said:

You are Valhalla, a Vanilla Townie. Your power is in your vote. You win when the Town controls the game.

 
Players:

1) Imran Ehsan (New Pacific Order) a Town 2-Shot Roleblocker has been rolled on night 3.
2) Robert2424 (Independent Republic of Orange Nations) a Town Universal Backup, has been rolled on night 7.
3) d3mon (Green Protection Agency) a Town Jack-of-all-Trades has been disbanded on day 3.
4) Samus (Umbrella) a Town 2-Shot Rolestopper has been rolled on night 1.
5) Yehom (New Polar Order) a Town Even-Night Follower, has been rolled on night 5.
6) Rafay (Orange Defense Network) a Mafia Jack-of-all-Trades has been disbanded on day 6.
7) Canik
8) Chaplain of Death (Doombird Doomcave) a Town Non-Consecutive Night Watcher has been rolled on night 3.
9) Ali bin Turban (R&R) a Town Vanilla Cop has been rolled on night 4.
10) iSocialism
11) King Hitler (NATO) a Town 1-Shot Commuter has been rolled on night 2.
12) Kaziocore (The Legion) a Town Odd-Night Tracker has been disbanded on day 2.
13) Finster Baby (Mostly Harmless Alliance) a Mafia 1-Shot Strongman has been disbanded on day 5.
14) Rhizoctonia (The Dark Templar) the Mafia Godfather has been disbanded on day 4.
15) Lyner
16) Avater (Federation of Armed Nations), a Town Motion Detector, has been forced to disband on day 7.
17) Roquentin
18) Mandarijn

19) KevinH (Sparta) a Town Miller, has been rolled on night 6.

 

Rules:

• During the Day phase each player may speak and vote in-thread.
• If a player receives the majority of the available votes during the Day, they are lynched.
• At deadline, a player with half-majority will be lynched.
• You may vote No Lynch.
• After the Day, the game goes to Night.
• The game thread is closed during the Night. The Mafia may speak to each other at Night.
• All Active Roles may submit actions via PM at Night.
• The Mafia can, as a faction, kill one player at Night.
• After the Night, the game goes to Day.
• All dead players (lynched or killed) can no longer participate in the game.
• Basic rules for maintaining the integrity of the game thread are in effect (i.e. players may not quote their Role PMs, nor may they discuss the game outside the game thread unless otherwise permitted, etc.)
• The game is won when only one faction remains in the game.
• Mass role-claiming is not allowed, but you may reveal your role if you have something interesting to share.
• You may pm me questions or ask them in the game thread, but you may not get an answer to some things.
• When voting, please enter your vote on a separate line of your post so that it isn't easily missed.

Game Days will last seven days.
Game Nights will last 48 hours.

I remember trying to setup trade circles when you couldn't change resources

my very first nation had furs as a resource. Nobody wanted to trade with me.

 

I remember trying to setup trade circles when you couldn't change resources

my very first nation had furs as a resource. Nobody wanted to trade with me.

 

 

The days of looking for random new nations on my color, asking them to trade.  Those were NOT the days

 

 

 

 

I remember trying to setup trade circles when you couldn't change resources

 

my very first nation had furs as a resource. Nobody wanted to trade with me.

 

 

 

The days of looking for random new nations on my color, asking them to trade.  Those were NOT the days

Oddly, that was never a problem for me. I wrote up a form letter, which I personalized as needed and almost always got what I wanted and recruited a new member to IRON.

All these votes. But are we lynching someone today or not?

Whats the current votes for everyone?

I will post an updated vote count in about 45 mins.

All these votes. But are we lynching someone today or not?

 

If we do, who will be the target? The most inactive one?

 

 

All these votes. But are we lynching someone today or not?

 

 

 

If we do, who will be the target? The most inactive one?

I don't like either of these post. Why are we so pushy for a vote?

Vote Count

Samus (3): iSocialism, Imran Ehsan, Roquentin

KevinH (2): Robert2424, Rafay

Imran Ehsan (1): Avater

Kaziocore (1): Samus

Lyner (1): Kaziocore

Mandarijn (1): King Hitler

Rafay (1): KevinH

Robert2424 (1): Chaplain of Death

Shahenshah (1): TheDoom

Ali bin Turban (0):

Avater (0):

Chaplain of Death (0):

Finster Baby (0):

iSocialism (0):

King Hitler (0):

Rhizoctonia (0):

Roquentin (0):
Sister Midnight (0):
TheDoom (0):

No Lynch (0):

Not voting: Ali bin Turban, Finster Baby, King Hitler, Lyner, Rhizoctonia, Shahenshah, Sister Midnight

 
With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch or 5 at deadline.
Deadline is 8:00 CST, Wednesday, April 27th.

 

 

All these votes. But are we lynching someone today or not?

 

 

If we do, who will be the target? The most inactive one?

I don't like either of these post. Why are we so pushy for a vote?

 

 

 

Mafia is a game of voting bruh

okay, something a tiny bit interesting i've seen.

 

take it as you will

 

From Imran's previous game.

 

 Samus seems like a good target. Possible problem with him though is as he is popular with the noobs he may draw some of their actions which is not a problem if its a watcher but he may get protected by a doc.

 

Bandwagon on me so early into the game? Why?

 

Imran #1 on suspect list as of now. Won't vote for him yet though.

because its fun to pick on you

Yeah but he's the all powerful root admin. He can make you disappear. I've seen it.

 

Hmmm...

I'll quote myself again because strangely some of you covered it with noise (I'm looking at you: Lyner aka "Always a scum", Rafay, KevinH and Finster  )

To get things into serious direction: we could do no rolling on the first day (because it seems random) and do organized sweep (person no1 checks person no2, while it checks person no3, while it checks person no4, etc...) to see if we can find something about the scums that want to overthrow our hegemony.

 

 

 

All these votes. But are we lynching someone today or not?

 

 

If we do, who will be the target? The most inactive one?

I don't like either of these post. Why are we so pushy for a vote?

 

 

 

Mafia is a game of voting bruh

 

 

Yeah, but you shouldn't be pushing just to vote. You want to target scum, not get a vote in by the end of the day.

okay, something a tiny bit interesting i've seen.

 

take it as you will

 

From Imran's previous game.

 

 Samus seems like a good target. Possible problem with him though is as he is popular with the noobs he may draw some of their actions which is not a problem if its a watcher but he may get protected by a doc.

 

Bandwagon on me so early into the game? Why?

 

Imran #1 on suspect list as of now. Won't vote for him yet though.

They are getting hasty for a vote. They will jump around. The main thing is Imran likes to get on the bandwagon early/start it, so he can use his defense of "I was the first/second person, I'm not bandwagoning excuse."

okay, something a tiny bit interesting i've seen.

 

take it as you will

 

From Imran's previous game.

 

 

 Samus seems like a good target. Possible problem with him though is as he is popular with the noobs he may draw some of their actions which is not a problem if its a watcher but he may get protected by a doc.

 

 

Bandwagon on me so early into the game? Why?

 

Imran #1 on suspect list as of now. Won't vote for him yet though.

I'm a noob with boobs (see what I did? Seventh grade humor) and think Samus is a hottie, so there you go.

 

How are you supposed to figure anything at all out on day one? It seems like you just have to take a wildass guess and hope for the best. I'm not prepared to finger anyone just yet unless someone can give me good reason to. I suppose inactivity is a reason, but is it a good one? On the other hand won't a mobster WANT to lynch someone right away? So does that make the enthusiastic lynch movers suspicious?

That was supposed to say lynch mobbers, but I can't go back and edit.

 

I'll quote myself again because strangely some of you covered it with noise (I'm looking at you: Lyner aka "Always a scum", Rafay, KevinH and Finster  )

To get things into serious direction: we could do no rolling on the first day (because it seems random) and do organized sweep (person no1 checks person no2, while it checks person no3, while it checks person no4, etc...) to see if we can find something about the scums that want to overthrow our hegemony.

 

I think I understand what you want to do, but there are a few problems with this tactic:

1) not everyone has a role (probably)

2) everyone who has a role has to come forward and confirm that they will check person X

3) scum will know who'll be checked out and can just use someone else to make the kill (of course cops will still get a positive result, but there probably are only 1-3 cops in the game and if they come forward they're dead the next night)

Of course it's not the "gg, scums may give up now" tactic. But it's an action that may help us, and thus it's much better than no action at all.

 

Ad 1. They wouldn't take action anyway so what I propose does not hurt.

Ad 2. Yes they'll have to confirm...but we are town and we are working together to weed out scums aren't we?

Ad 3. Chances 2 scums are placed together on the list (the one in the first post) is low, so potentially (potentially for us, they obviously know if there's anyone safe) every scum is endangered. Also someone with weak modifier will let us detect scum with 100% probability (if he visits one).

 

I'm not claiming it's the best move we can make (I'm inexperienced) and if there are better propositions I'm all ears...but we need to do something and do it as team and not chaotically.

We'll also need 2 to check on everyone, as how will you know 1 speaks the truth? He/she could be a scum as well (and they know who town is), so they can easily make some claims...

 

There's no tactic (that I know of) to do something like this. You just have to analyse posts, get a discussion going, accuse people, see how they react and use the intel you get in the night (if any).

 

 

I'll quote myself again because strangely some of you covered it with noise (I'm looking at you: Lyner aka "Always a scum", Rafay, KevinH and Finster  )

To get things into serious direction: we could do no rolling on the first day (because it seems random) and do organized sweep (person no1 checks person no2, while it checks person no3, while it checks person no4, etc...) to see if we can find something about the scums that want to overthrow our hegemony.

 

I think I understand what you want to do, but there are a few problems with this tactic:

1) not everyone has a role (probably)

2) everyone who has a role has to come forward and confirm that they will check person X

3) scum will know who'll be checked out and can just use someone else to make the kill (of course cops will still get a positive result, but there probably are only 1-3 cops in the game and if they come forward they're dead the next night)

 

Agreed. That looks like a plan, but if you follow through, it has too many holes. In the end, it'll be kind of a massive role-claim with scum having a heads up. 

 

 

They are getting hasty for a vote. They will jump around. The main thing is Imran likes to get on the bandwagon early/start it, so he can use his defense of "I was the first/second person, I'm not bandwagoning excuse."

 

You guys are still holding my last game against me...because I outfoxed you all..lol. No I am not scum..in fact I have hardly ever been scum. Most of the games I played in has been as an innocent townie and you can go back and check that I never vote no lynch. Its boring and stoopid. We need to get lynching fast so we have bandwagons to analyze in later days. No lynching strategy is over reliant on the cop with all other townies sitting around sucking their thumb and hope that someone finds something useful at night. I like a more pro-active approach. Where is the Mango when you need him. He would have backed me up.

I'm fine with lynching someone, but who're we going to pick then?

We'll also need 2 to check on everyone, as how will you know 1 speaks the truth? He/she could be a scum as well (and they know who town is), so they can easily make some claims...

 

There's no tactic (that I know of) to do something like this. You just have to analyse posts, get a discussion going, accuse people, see how they react and use the intel you get in the night (if any).

You're getting it, even if you don't know it yet . If this move wont archive anything else it'll still be enough because there will be more talk about who did what, scums will lie or keep silent (which is suspicious too)...and when they lie there's a chance they make mistake.

Also if we do it in orderly fashion, scums will not have as much freedom to lie as they'd have otherwise (constraining them in their lies is another step to force them to make mistake).

 

 

 

 

I'll quote myself again because strangely some of you covered it with noise (I'm looking at you: Lyner aka "Always a scum", Rafay, KevinH and Finster  )

To get things into serious direction: we could do no rolling on the first day (because it seems random) and do organized sweep (person no1 checks person no2, while it checks person no3, while it checks person no4, etc...) to see if we can find something about the scums that want to overthrow our hegemony.

 

I think I understand what you want to do, but there are a few problems with this tactic:

1) not everyone has a role (probably)

2) everyone who has a role has to come forward and confirm that they will check person X

3) scum will know who'll be checked out and can just use someone else to make the kill (of course cops will still get a positive result, but there probably are only 1-3 cops in the game and if they come forward they're dead the next night)

 

Agreed. That looks like a plan, but if you follow through, it has too many holes. In the end, it'll be kind of a massive role-claim with scum having a heads up. 

 

Can't they role claim no matter what we do? They can do it anyway and always risk that someone will challenge their statement.

 

They are getting hasty for a vote. They will jump around. The main thing is Imran likes to get on the bandwagon early/start it, so he can use his defense of "I was the first/second person, I'm not bandwagoning excuse."

 

You guys are still holding my last game against me...because I outfoxed you all..lol. No I am not scum..in fact I have hardly ever been scum. Most of the games I played in has been as an innocent townie and you can go back and check that I never vote no lynch. Its boring and stoopid. We need to get lynching fast so we have bandwagons to analyze in later days. No lynching strategy is over reliant on the cop with all other townies sitting around sucking their thumb and hope that someone finds something useful at night. I like a more pro-active approach. Where is the Mango when you need him. He would have backed me up.

 

I'm actually proposing something EM has proposed in other game:P

The problem with your strategy is that there has to be mass role claims on D2 to identify that scum, which I am pretty sure is not allowed.

The little I've played, I've never been a fan of a no lynch on day 1.

 

We need to start weeding through. Look and see who potential scum are. We also need to try and avoid the massive role claim on Day 2. That's what killed us townies off in the Force Awakens game.

 

I'm still a noob tho. Only played a couple of games, so the strategizing isn't my strong point yet.

 

I see what you're saying Ali, and it's not entirely a bad idea. That said, no lynch on day 1? Not a fan.