Sorry in advance, this one is going to be a bit long - but you won't have to click through links to see what I'm referring to.
So when iSocialism led with this:
I'm leaning more towards Preston, and I can explain why in a few days.
I was expecting something more coherent than a laundry list of my posts with no specific lines or points called out in them, just labelling the entire mass 'suspicious'. If you had a clear reason to suspect me you could have summarized it when you made the original post - but with the delay and now this, I am more inclined to see it as your needing the time to try and find something to back up what you'd originally said.
This is also while i choose not do this a few day back on my phone. Also it's a cheap shot to call BS and someone scummy because they come out and want the town to wait on the voting so they can have a say before someone is lynched. Think about that <--- one scum left, someone is a shoeing to be lynch and then the scum would come out and say stop?????? It would have been alright if you call me out after the two days such as today or late yesterday.
Even if it's slow, you could have typed everything but the list of links on your phone. What I focused on you for was setting up "I'm going to have something to say!" and then not saying it - either you already had the idea in your head at the start, or you didn't.
The thing I found troubling out Preston is his no so actively scum hunting. He would subtleness is the first thing I noticed.
How is the following not scum hunting, or indeed subtle at all?
First and foremost, I am removing my FoS on Finster and moving instead to a HARD FoS on King Hitler. And not just for what Finster quoted above:
...
I believe Finster is correct on that, and to double down on it:
First, my role claim that Samus requested. Ron Weasley, 1 shot commuter. May be why the results were different, ...
1-shot commuter... and claims that it might be why Samus's role was different. If you didnt use your role, it should not have done anything to affect Samus on Night 2. But then you claim you tried to commute on Night 3? How many shots again? I think we may have found our second scum right here. And the fact that Finster pointed out what he did, along with Samus's result on Night 3, exonerates Finster in my eyes.
Because I don't want the Ali wagon to immediately reach its end and kill the day (and because I still want to be skeptical of Kevin's roleclaim due to how 'too good to be true' it seems), I'm casting my vote for King Hitler:
Vote: King Hitler
King Hitler - per lying/contradiction, suspected to be scum
Finster Baby - Strongly felt to be town
KevinH - Apparently proven town sane cop. With Ali's flip he definitely started a wagon on a proven scum.
Preston - Me, Town (Why would I say otherwise?). Also investigated as town by Kevin
iSocialism - Kevin investigated as Town. Otherwise uncertain about them.
Lyner - Uncertain
Wolfpacks - Kevin investigated as Town, but argumentative and
Sister Midnight - Seems pro town, if new.
Mazuurek - Short posts and lurking, not taking seriously?
Of that list, I'd push for King Hitler today and then... well it'll depend on what happens tonight I guess. We can expect Kevin will get at least one more investigation out so long as his protection holds. We still might have to worry about there being a Godfather in play... wouldn't it be crazy if KH was that?
I looked for signs of contradiction in someone, and it proved them to be scum. I broke down who remained into my theories about scum and town, and looked for who we should examine next. That *is* scum hunting. So I don't know where you are pulling out that I am somehow being subtle about it.
Very recently he has been throwing doubts out about a GF role and how me and WP can't be trusted. He still though keep himself away from this theory. When he talks about AbT or KH he would group them with other people and talk about then quickly brush it off.
How am I saying we dont have a godfather role in play? It's provably *possible* that we do not - there are people yet uninvestigated by Kevin, and it's worth covering all cases - but that does not mean a godfather isn't present. You're stretching to find some fault with me here.
As for me keeping myself away from the theory of a godfather - no, I have very explicitly pointed out that 1) a godfather could be present and 2) that it could technically be me as well.
3c) Also want to point out that if we have a Mafia Godfather in play, iSoc could still be scum by passing this claimed investigation. Technically so could I, though obviously I say that I am not.
I will also point out that my post is the first one in the thread to explicitly mention a godfather from Kevin's findings aside from people quoting TW's role listings. If I were a godfather, it would make so much more sense to just not bring it up.
Yes, hunting for scum is a good thing voting for a scum is a good thing. Calling BS on someone who is them proven scum is a good thing.
However, IMO, Preston only tries to discredit people. Early in the game he was heavly on Kevin, FB, and WP case. While he showed little interest in AbT or only jumped on KH when he made a mistake. His voting pattern is no better than mine, but I think I still tried to scum hunt. He let the other people do the voting.
I hunted scum and called BS on KH, who was proven scum. Good things then?
The only thing you get right in your spiel is that early in the game I *was* heavily suspicious of Kevin and Finster. Finster jumped votes all over the place and suggested a roleclaim on day 2, and Kevin's posting style seemed utterly statistical- going after inactivity and post counts, such that if he lynched town he could point to his numbers and not claim any responsibility. That style did not sit well with me, and so Kevin's initial roleclaim as a cop was not fully trusted. However I voted for AbT as part of testing KevinH's claim, which is far from letting others simply do the voting for me. In my quote above you can see where I removed my FoS on Finster, and while I remained suspicious of Kevin for longer at this point we are all mostly trusting his input.
This is all my opinion, and not as much as was going to say. Cause in the end you all need to get your own opinion and not wait for mine to base your off of. I would strongly recommended to reread post done by people see how they interacted or didn't interact with other players. Please reread all of Preston post, and at least I linked.
Preston the rebuttal is yours, I wait for my vote until then.
So here is your rebuttal.
Everything in this game and thread is opinion - however you built up the reveal of your opinion about me specifically with your earlier announcement, and everything in it except my early game suspicion of Kevin and Finster has been wrong. Simply saying you think I am suspicious and giving people a laundry list of my posts to draw their own conclusions isn't anything coherent worth teasing a multi-day wait over... which makes this look like little more than an attempt to divert attention onto me and away from yourself. Take a look at my original post that you responded so strongly to:
So unless the remaining scum is Mazuurek, SM, or somehow Kevin himself then it means that Kevin has already investigated them - and hence a Godfather is in play. Which would also mean they have no other power beyond appearing innocent to investigations.
...
Wolfpacks seems to be all over the place with his posts. I'm not sure what to think about that - so Kevin's rationale may be the best we have on him.
Lyner I'm not sure about. Yesterday nearly ended him with a rapid wagon that iSoc started, and King Hitler *could* have hammered it to finished the lynch before conversation and votes for him built too much further - i.e. he posted while Lyner was at 4 votes when a 5th would have done it. Does this mean Lyner is scum that his ally wouldn't hammer, or was King just screwing around at that point - especially since his post at that point was not very serious?
iSocialism is also currently on my radar for a few reasons:
1) Why did the scum target Finster who was merely on the KH wagon, and not iSocialism who hammered it? Either the hammer vote is supposed to mean something, or he was using it to jump on the existing wagon before it ended.
2) iSoc's reference to role name claiming for Wolfpacks, and then proactively offering his own like he wanted to get it out as part of his own innocence. KH banked heavily on his own name too as part of his defense.
3) iSoc's vague reference to something about me he wants to say later in the day... obviously I'll pay attention to it, but I also want to know why he's not just saying it NOW?
With Mazuurek's +1 vote on Wolfpacks, it is not safe to vote there right now because that could end the day immediately if someone hammers it. I am open to that being what we go with today, but right now I am waiting to hear more from iSocialism.
I did not single out iSocialism alone, I continued scum hunting by looking at remaining candidates on my short list. The only thing I said for waiting on you was in response to your "wait a few days" statement. And in response to that, you jumped immediately to "I don't have to answer to you Preston"... what? That's incredibly defensive on your part, as I commented:
I don't have to answer to you Preston. You have been quiet in the past. Don't use my talking as an excuse not to talk more. However I'm on my phone and don't care to try to go back and forth trying to quote and reply. I'm meeting said that to get the town to slow down the vote on WP, and not end the day so early. It's not going to be an explanation to you but rather my reason for you to everyone else. Also, I like have you ask why the scum didn't vote for me over FB. Don't you think they would think a hammer vote would look suspicious. FB wasn't investigate yet. Don't you think Kevin investigation would have lead to an helpful Hogwarts if any of the previously people were the doc. FB was targeted because the scum thought he was the doc or a high chance of a power role. Where did I ever say character name would tell us if there scum. Also KH wasn't wasn't Don that was his fake RC name. My character name theory is to see people willingness, and to see if they would lie and get caught by a counter. Either way, I owe you no expectations. You're the one that needs to start talking
Wow, that's a very defensive reaction to my comments.
No one has to 'answer to' anyone in this thread - but I don't think you do yourself any favors by remaining vague like that. Town typically does better when more information comes out, not less.
If I read what you wrote correctly, the reason you say you're delaying whatever note about me you teased is to delay the wolfpacks wagon... but per yesterday we've seen that anyone can finish the lynch quickly, so I am not sure how effective drawing out that statement will be.
You seem to be linking a "Helpful Hogwarts Staff" finding from Kevin as a power role indication, but that did not apply to Chaplain of Death - for that matter Kevin himself has claimed to be Hermione Granger, which would be a student and not staff. So FB not having been investigated did not make him any more likely to have had a power role. You seem to believe that it did, and that's why he was chosen over you last night. Scum logic is always WIFOM to try and figure out, but Finster was no more or less likely to have a role than anyone left alive.
You are correct that KH was not actually Ron, but he gave that name previously and then asked if it sounded like scum or not as part of his defense - and no one challenged him about it, even though he proved scum in the end. Therefore I think that name-listing is unlikely to produce a name-counter... so at best I find the name claiming a distraction, and at worst a way that scum try to show that they have non-scum names as part of their defense. You may disagree with this assessment, and that's fine. But I find it interesting that you pushed Wolfpacks ( who has a half-majority already ) to post their name, then posted your own first - wouldn't that go against the idea of looking for someone to lie and be caught by a counter? He certainly won't claim the name you've used anymore.
Up to you how to respond from here - but I am still interested in you following through on whatever you'd said you would say in a few days.
These two posts also contain my reasons for watching iSocialism as a candidate... and he has not done any favors for himself being this defensive in the meantime, snapping back and forth with people and capping it off with this post that is a laundry list of links and mostly false statements.
As much as Kevin seems to want to suggest Wolfpacks, I am now heavily leaning toward iSocialism. And because you say I let others do the voting for me...
Vote: iSocialismMost notable reasons include his pressure for name-claiming as a way to catch scum (that he then defeats by posting his own name first), his defensiveness so far during the day, and the fact that scum did not target him despite his hammer on the KH wagon. None of these are conclusive, all opinion - but it currently makes iSoc the most scummy alive as I see it.
-Preston