I can agree with most of your post but I have two issues:
1) I wouldn't give Narsis a free pass because the previous player seemed uninterested. Nerau could, in fact, really have been too busy.
2) Yes, KevinH voted for EM to save his own skin. However, he did so after EM voted KevinH to save his skin. If EM had voted for Falzis instead, then I think we would have lynched Falzis there. On the other hand, both EM and KevinH are very experienced players. They may have feared that we would lynch one of them next and that they would seem connected. So, overal, I agree that we should not give KevinH a free pass because of that vote, but it does speak slightly in his favor compared to Sir Jesus and Narsis.
As I said in my first post of today, I had done a reread of D3. Unfortunately, most of that information was centered around Falzis, but I also made some remarks regarding the other players. I wasn't really suspicious of KevinH and I hadn't noticed any really strange posts, so I did not have any relevant notes of him. The same goes for Theophilos, but for him I am still quite certain that he is town. About KevinH, however, I have my doubts. I am especially wary of the quicklynch of Falzis yesterday. That was simply unnecessary and certainly not in our advantage.
Narsis: Didn�t vote on D2. I suppose this was mainly due to the inactivity of Nerau. So I�ll disregard it. His first post after replacing defends EM. At that point EM was receiving some heat, but I was the only one voting for EM. Says he is suspicious of KevinH and Sir Jesus in the same post.
This, combined with Narsis' vote today for KevinH makes me believe that they are not scum together. His suspicions of Sir jesus also make that connection less likely. His defense of EM makes him more likely to be scum but EM also made this post:
Quote
I have my own wild theory about Nerau that I'll share since you brought him up. The nk scene mentioned there were two killers. What if there were 3 mafia (as most vets would say is about the right amount) but since Nerau was inactive Mole didn't include him in the write up. Nerau could be the mafia godfather and when he didn't send in his night action it went to the 2nd goon in charge and Mole wrote the scene using only the two active goons?
This seems to work in favour of Narsis. Why would EM put forth this theory if this was indeed the truth? There were others in favor of lynching Nerau at that point. Why would EM try to persuade more people to vote for Nerau, if he was his scum buddy? Of course he wouldn't be of much use inactive, but sooner or later he was bound to get replaced.
Sir Jesus: I had written this in my analysis:
Was the last one to vote for Sojourner on D2 and that vote sealed the lynch. If Falzis is scum, I am convinced that Sir Jesus is scum as well. It would have been a clear way to save his scum buddy. On the other hand, if Falzis is not scum, then I believe it would make it less likely that Sir Jesus is scum. I just can�t imagine the scum putting themselves out there like that if the vote was between two townies.Turns out Falzis was a townie, so I believe that makes it less likely that Sir Jesus is scum.
Mentioned early in the day that if there is a strong doc, that he should lay low. This was before EM �suggested� the roleclaim. Since I�ve lynched EM partly for suggesting that roleclaim, I�ll credit Sir Jesus for suggesting that the doc lays low. However, after EM �proposed� the roleclaim, he says that his gut tells him to keep the pro town roles safe and hidden, but he doesn�t immediately reject EM�s plan. Of course he did post his objections, but I would have expected someone who wanted the strong doc to lay low to respond a bit more fiercely to this proposal of EM. So that earn him some suspicion from me.
When, at the start of D3, EM was asked who he found the most suspicious he answered Falzis and Sir Jesus. A little later EM votes for Sir Jesus. At this point, KevinH and Theophilos were voting for Falzis and CD and I were voting for Kaziocore. There was no significant pressure on either EM or Sir Jesus at this point. This earns Sir Jesus some townie points from me. On the other hand, it does raise some suspicion against Kaziocore. EM had been too closely connected to Falzis on D1 and 2 to suddenly change all the way and vote him. So if Kaziocore was scum together with EM, EM would have needed to find a new target for the lynch and that turned out to be Sir Jesus. IF Kaziocore is scum, then Sir Jesus is not.
Kaziocore: Another interesting post by EM:
Quote
Also if I were Kaziocore and I were scum, I would have my vote on Falzis right now. As it's shaping up it's going to be between Kaziocore and Falzis, with Kaziocore having more votes as it stands now. Kaziocore is 1 out of only 3 active players yet to vote. If he were scum I highly believe that he would have voted for Falzis to save his own skin. Instead Kaziocore has basically offered himself up as our next lynch candidate.
At that point it was 3 votes for Kaziocore, 2 for Falzis, 1 for Sir Jesus. EM managed to get Kaziocore of the chopping block with this post. I stated at that time that I did not believe this to be a valid reason to unvote and I still believe so. Anyway, looking back, EM was clearly defending Kaziocore. With EM turning out to be scum, that makes Kaziocore look bad. Finally, after EM's roleclaim proposal:
Quote
I'm guessing that the strong doctor can find out information. I imagine the strong doctor is like the head of this hospital and has like the records of all the patients in this place.
If the strong doc would indeed be an investigative/informative role instead of a regular doc, then EM�s suggestion wouldn�t be so outrageous. So this could be viewed as Kaziocore defending EM. However, I may be overestimating Kaziocore here. He is new, afterall, and I am not sure if he could have drawn the conclusion at that point that if the strong doc was an invenstigative role that it wouldn't be so bad to suggest a roleclaim.
Anyway, I have one huge issue with Kaziocore possibly being scum and that is his vote for EM. Kaziocore was the third to vote for EM and he was the one that really got the bandwagon going against EM. There is a good chance we wouldn't have lynched EM without Kaziocore. So why would he have done so if he is scum? Also, I've had my suspicions about him since the beginning and, unfortunately, that may lead to me seeing things there are not, just to confirm my believe. So I would like to know from the other players what they think about all this. I would especially like to hear from Theophilos.
Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top
