108 replies to this topic

[KevinH]

 

Vote count:

iSocialism (3): Imran Ehsan, LordSunday, Northern Empire,
LordSunday (1): Zacch
Imran Ehsan (0):
captainjf (0):
Northern Empire (0):
Zacch (0):

Not voting: captainjf, iSocialism,

 

With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline is Friday, October 20 at 12:00 EDT.
If a majority lynch is not achieved by deadline, it will be a no-lynch.

[Zacch]

Vote: iSocialism

 

Give him a chance to come back why hammer?

FoS: Northewrn Empire for hammering isoc

I miscounted.

 

Only 3 on Isoc

[captainjf]

Straight from a No Lynch vote to setting up the hammer on someone? That's interesting. Especially with nearly 3 days left.

[Imran Ehsan]

not much to go on for a vote - 

 

i will abstain from voting until the next day

 

--  No- Lynch

 

 

Vote: iSocialism

 

Yeah pretty contradictory. Care to explain your change of heart?

[Northern Empire]

yes, 100% 

1) the no vote was not accepted, 

2)Isocialism appears to be inactive, he has not responded at all to the thread,

3) Mine is not the Convicting vote, 1 more is required, 

 

Thus,

it is not up to me to decide if or if not he gets lynched- but it is the remaining voters,  

so the 4th voter is likely scum, as they would get a kill

 

if he remains inactive then the vote will stand- if he responds before the deadline then we will see what happens, 

[Zacch]

yes, 100% 

1) the no vote was not accepted, 

2)Isocialism appears to be inactive, he has not responded at all to the thread,

3) Mine is not the Convicting vote, 1 more is required, 

 

Thus,

it is not up to me to decide if or if not he gets lynched- but it is the remaining voters,  

so the 4th voter is likely scum, as they would get a kill

 

if he remains inactive then the vote will stand- if he responds before the deadline then we will see what happens, 

 

What's difficult about evaluating a player like NE is you don't know if the scum tells are because they are scum or if its just because they are a newer player.

 

If this was Imran or Kevin, I would be voting to lynch them right now.

 

But I honestly think that NE is just a newer player.

[LordSunday]

yes, 100% 

1) the no vote was not accepted, 

2)Isocialism appears to be inactive, he has not responded at all to the thread,

3) Mine is not the Convicting vote, 1 more is required, 

 

Thus,

it is not up to me to decide if or if not he gets lynched- but it is the remaining voters,  

so the 4th voter is likely scum, as they would get a kill

 

if he remains inactive then the vote will stand- if he responds before the deadline then we will see what happens, 

 

To clarify Kevin only didn't accept the vote because it wasn't formatted properly. If you wanted to no-lynch you had to put it as "Vote: No Lynch." That also has to be in a separate line to count (meaning Kevin shouldn't take that as me changing my vote).

 

iSocialism has less than two days now. And per Kevin's bone iSoc isn't fully inactive as his role PM was read.

[KevinH]

LordSunday said it perfectly.  Votes should be formatted so they are obvious.

 

Vote count:

iSocialism (3): Imran Ehsan, LordSunday, Northern Empire,
LordSunday (1): Zacch
Imran Ehsan (0):
captainjf (0):
Northern Empire (0):
Zacch (0):

Not voting: captainjf, iSocialism,

 

With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.
Deadline is Friday, October 20 at 12:00 EDT.
If a majority lynch is not achieved by deadline, it will be a no-lynch.
 

[LordSunday]

Note to Zacch and captain; according to rules a hammer is required before deadline. Otherwise we no-lynch. Given zero check-in and nothing else to go on iSoc does seem our best choice here today.

[Zacch]

Note to Zacch and captain; according to rules a hammer is required before deadline. Otherwise we no-lynch. Given zero check-in and nothing else to go on iSoc does seem our best choice here today.

 

I guess time is up for Isoc.

 

Vote: Isoc

[captainjf]

I'm torn, but the decision has already been made...

[KevinH]

Zacch's vote was past the deadline.
 
Vote count:

iSocialism (3): Imran Ehsan, LordSunday, Northern Empire,
LordSunday (1): Zacch
Imran Ehsan (0):
captainjf (0):
Northern Empire (0):
Zacch (0):

Not voting: captainjf, iSocialism,

Nobody is lynched.

It is now Night 1.
You may talk to your neighbors in the appropriate thread.

Day 2 will begin Monday, October 23 at 23:00 EDT
 

[KevinH]

Night 1 ends.
 
Zacch, a Town Neighbor, was killed in the night.
 
It is now Day 2.

Vote count:

iSocialism (0): 
LordSunday (0): 
Imran Ehsan (0):
captainjf (0):
Northern Empire (0):

Not voting: captainjf, iSocialism, Imran Ehsan, LordSunday, Northern Empire,

 

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch.
Deadline is Monday, October 30 at 12:00 EDT.
If a majority lynch is not achieved by deadline, it will be a no-lynch.

[Imran Ehsan]

Seems like the odd night SK made his move. Interesting choice in taking out Zacch. He didn't really look townie with his late D1 vote switch.

[LordSunday]

Seems like the odd night SK made his move. Interesting choice in taking out Zacch. He didn't really look townie with his late D1 vote switch.

 

In defense of the dead he had only put that vote on me in reaction to my initial D1 vote on you. I wouldn't have assumed that was vote switching, though the vote being 1 hour late of deadline definitely hurt us.

 

With that in mind, Zacch's death presents an interesting conundrum. I've been running the whole neighbor concept through my head trying to think how an SK would react to it. In other words, would they be more inclined to keep their neighbor alive to try and have a biased ally, or kill them off to prevent the mistake of a possible slip during potential 1-on-1 conversation at night?

 

Vote: iSocialism

 

You aren't escaping today without a word.

[Northern Empire]

 

Seems like the odd night SK made his move. Interesting choice in taking out Zacch. He didn't really look townie with his late D1 vote switch.

 

 

 

I've been running the whole neighbor concept through my head trying to think how an SK would react to it. In other words, would they be more inclined to keep their neighbor alive to try and have a biased ally, or kill them off to prevent the mistake of a possible slip during potential 1-on-1 conversation at night?

 

I had the very same thought process, 

[captainjf]

I think the strategy a SK would use is to keep their neighbor alive and try and pit the other pairs against eachother. I can't quite figure out why the SK would chose the last vote on iSoc, unless iSoc is playing without playing?

[KevinH]

Vote count:

iSocialism (1): LordSunday,
LordSunday (0): 
Imran Ehsan (0):
captainjf (0):
Northern Empire (0):

Not voting: captainjf, iSocialism, Imran Ehsan, Northern Empire,

 
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch.
Deadline is Monday, October 30 at 12:00 EDT.
If a majority lynch is not achieved by deadline, it will be a no-lynch.

[iSocialism]

interesting

[Imran Ehsan]

There are 2 SKs in this game and they are not working as a team. I think the strategy that the odd night SK used was trying to take out the even-night SK, because the even-night SK comes into play this night and he may be the target. So it is possible the odd night SK saw something in Zacchs posts that made him think he was the other SK. Because otherwise, I dont see why SK will kill Zacch unless he was trying to frame someone for the lynch. 

With that in mind, Zacch's death presents an interesting conundrum. I've been running the whole neighbor concept through my head trying to think how an SK would react to it. In other words, would they be more inclined to keep their neighbor alive to try and have a biased ally, or kill them off to prevent the mistake of a possible slip during potential 1-on-1 conversation at night?

 

I think this is in everyones minds. I would say this will become more vital after 1-2 more people have been killed/lynched, because then we can start pairing up people and zero in who the SK partners of killed townies are. 

interesting

 

Good to see you have shown up. Want to elaborate on your thoughts?