Lyner

We lynched Malfoy and he was scum. Can Malfoy be considered an antagonist in the series?

Woah that escalated fast. I see mis-informations everywhere. 1. Can Samus clarify if he is a "Tracker" or "Watcher"? Seems like AbT thinks it's the latter. I can confirm I didn't target anyone on the first night. 2. KH, did you use your ability last night? 3. Preston, if we take into account of TW's last game with similar setup, each scums are given Encryptor role with an additional role, one of them is JoAT. So I wouldn't count out the roles that started with 'Mafia' suffix. 4. Regarding names, does anyone have a "bad" name? If not then it means role name doesn't worth anything I'd rather have those who doesn't have conclusive info(but will) to keep their role for themselves for now.

Yea I don't know much about the posting style of those in newer group, you included. Can't be too careful

Funny your name does not appear in that list Probably because my name is on the "certainly townie" list instead of "possible townie" And about Rafay, I disagree that the lack of defense is indication that he is town. The proof is Lego's wagon. It is more likely that either scums are inactive or both Rafay and Lego are scum, rather than him being town. Heck if I were scum I would let him live so I can use him as scapegoat in later days.

Eh if Samus have conclusive proof on someone then it's best to reveal it in the last moment, if he doesn't then I'll leave the better judgment to him. Newer Players: Wolfpacks - Nothing suspicious if we take account that this is his first game. His scum friends could do better than that if he is truly a scum. Mazuurek - Nothing suspicious if we take account that this is his first game, the lack of commitment is saddening, could also mean his scum friends told him to play the inactive card Sister Midnight - Only following wagons, playing the newbie card really well Not so new players: Rafay - I've said it all on the past two days, you guys still let him have his way. KevinH - Same old methodical Kevin, haven't said anything scummy yet, I got a good vibe. Ali bin Turban - Playing a bit more defensive than his past games. Finster Baby - Looking good, his actions have been on point. iSocialism - I don't see why he suddenly targetted Rafay on day 3, not on day 2 or day 1. King Hitler - Got a bad vibe from his style of postings. Early vote on Lego wagon gave some town credits though. Preston - Took a neutral approach for things, as in not taking sides. Posting good kinds of wall of text. Samus - The only confirmed townie for now. So possible suspects, without order: -Preston -King Hitler -iSocialism -AbT -Rafay Possible towns: -Samus -Finster -KevinH

that your lurking habits make you scum more and more. If by lurk you mean I had to post something everytime I check out this thread then yes I'm a lurker Or is this still about the day 2? Regarding SM's debacle, I think this is the tl;dr version: 1. SM's vote is not the deciding vote, Rhizo's is 2. Kevin insists that SM's additional vote is a townie action that sealed Lego's fate 3. AbT insists that SM's additional vote is not necessarily a townie action 4. AbT is accusing Kevin based on point 2

I heard Rafay and Samus have something to share?

Good decision by Samus yesterday, I think he is pretty much a confirmed town. Eh I really thought another wagon couldn't be made(it was like what, less than 10 hours before deadline?). That's why I didn't even count lego on the first place. Your action back then looked just like a scum desperately trying to defend your scum friend. You proved me wrong, of course Now onto today's menu: Rhizo is dead instead of Samus who is clearly a town. I think this is the same as last night, as in scums're trying to find the cops instead of the most townie/active one. Or it could be they're afraid someone is protecting/watching Samus. This is the final tally on yesterday's wagons: Personally I find the lack of defense in scums' part disturbing. As we can see they only need 1 or 2, depending on the timing, to save Lego. This could mean a number of things: 1. Some scums already slipped in Lego's wagon so it will be suspicious to move the vote 2. Some scums are inactive 3. Some scums are already on Wolfpack's wagon Out of the three I think number 3 is most likely, followed with number 1 and 2

More like almost every game I played here. In the later days because we tried to lynch someone that "looks suspicious" without any solid evidence, we're left with inactive townies not being replaced and unable to vote for the scums, or we're left with inactive scums hiding alongside inactive townies. Aren't you supposed to lynch suspicious looking people? My "looks suspicious" is a sarcasm Poor Wolfpack is being accused for his way of posting while it can easily be explained that this is his first game, of course he might not play optimally. But at least he is active, and on the later days we can judge him better. On the other hand, Rafay, a seasoned player, is being inactive and not helping at all

More like almost every game I played here. In the later days because we tried to lynch someone that "looks suspicious" without any solid evidence, we're left with inactive townies not being replaced and unable to vote for the scums, or we're left with inactive scums hiding alongside inactive townies.

Well, I got those 'Lyner is always scums' too, so I can relate the feelings I understand your points, but the problem at hand, Samus, is what is the alternative? The way I see this we can only end today by lynching either you, Wolfpack, or Rafay, or we can go no-lynch. No-Lynching at this point of the day is terribad. So I'm left with 3 choices: -Wolfpack, posting fluffs, not really contributing, I gave him a newbie pass today, moreso because he is active -Samus, was active on day 1, disappeared on day 2. Generally post analysis on past games -Rafay, not helping at all, only post when being called on day 1, always lurk on past games. The conclusion is pretty obvious.

I'm back Glad to see you, Preston. I see you already climbed to the top of most likely townie in less than a day Points of interest in day 2: 1. Why CoD as a target last night? He wasn't very active in this game, so perhaps scums thought he's trying to lay low and he has some investigation power. If I were scum though, I will first kill the actives(Finster, King, SM) and analytical ones(Kevin, AbT), and would later kill the PRs after they actually dropped some hints that they are PR. This slightly indicates that the scums are comfortable with leaving those grups of player alive. The lack of lynch on day one, and the lack of any wagon on active players on day two also support this. Scums are playing it safe and felt fine with just killing the inactives one by one. 2. Today's lynch target It seems everyone is keen on lynching the inactives/lurkers, and particularly Rafay and Samus who haven't posted once since the start of the day(I see I almost become part of this group ). Indication that our PR roles haven't found anything solid yet. The interesting thing is, the same group of people who voted no-lynch yesterday(Kevin, King, Finster), suddenly voted for Rafay today, without any solid justifications. Why today, and not yesterday? FoS: Kevin, King Hitler, Finster That said, since I came a bit too late to the party(less than 2 real life days left), I don't think I can start a new wagon right now and I don't see any solid scum tell yet, so, just like my yesterday's vote: Vote: Rafay Also it's interesting to see that AbT completely forgot about Rafay and how he will be a liability to the town

Sorry bros, this week's a busy one for me, give me one or two days to recover

Alas I can only vote one person at a time, Rafay is more inactive than iSoc atm, he is more 'liable' if we're using your term correctly We only have a few days left, those who are still undecided should make his stance clear

Well, theoretically, we have additional evidences such as people's post habit, their position regarding this day one no vote/vote, and consistency to be analysed for later days. How much their behaviour changed after getting a night information in the day 2 can be used to make some assumptions. Practically, however, it is rare to see players go through that much effort Therefore, unless we spotted someone without a nose it is better to hang the lurkers, especially if they are experienced players(Rafay and iSoc lurked through the last game and turned out to be scums). iSoc started posting again, so let's lynch some Rafay Vote: Rafay

Good game Daily reminder that "lurking scums" strategy are bad and not fun

Can we start calling out the shy boys? Vote: iSocialism

http://66.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lorr8kd6xJ1qe0tyl.gif

The inactives usually outnumber the replacements, although this time there are a lot of new players so I might be proven wrong I consider lurkers as part of the inactives, so I agree that they should be pressured Anyway TW just hinted that we shouldn't give away our character

I'm a voyeur not a tracker

On the third night, I watched AbT, the result is: Watched Geez you aren't even trying iSoc Vote: iSoc Watched Roq last night, got nothing

Hi again I think it's clear by looking at the few last games that lynching inactives early in the game is the best move

Because you, dear sir, didn't bother to reply my inquiry for 3 days and suddenly comes when I gave u iSoc's the last scum I guess Care to tell us your role?

This is taking too long Vote: Avater

Nah as I said before Manda, I confirmed Roq is indeed our Doctor Then Roq confirmed that Canik is town using his weak power it's either Avater or iSoc today, I'm preferring iSoc unless he has a role claim for us?