I apologize for the wall of text I'm about to make. I've played this entire game on my phone and finally have been able to get to a desktop and actually read over everything. Heres my thoughts on everyone.
Mandarijn - Town - Began the discussion to figure out a plan for the town in Post #7, made some good additions during the conversation despite an overlook (AbT as well), but not large enough to convince me hes scum.
The Warrior - On the Fence, leaning towards town. - First person to want to discuss plan with Mandarijn, despite random D1 posts in between the two. D1 TW gave off good town vibes, until he began to target Canik/Ferm. I felt he just jumped on the wagon there and refused to bunge, even after Canik made a fairly convincing town post in my opinion. His recent behavior is what is leading me more to the on the fence feel. In Post 274, he mentions alot of things I seen as well reading over the thread, mainly about Imran (get to that later.) but failed to mention Imran addressed some of his concerns earlier in post 257 when Rhizo brought up some of the same points.
Canik - Town - Ferm was one of the beginning voices for the no lynch vote, and held true to it. I don't think a scum would hold so strongly towards a no-lynch. Canik also came in and defended the accusations fairly well when he joined. (didnt write post # down. But you know the post I'm referring to.) I feel this is probably the best time to bring up Imran.
Imran - Scum - In post 108, 167, and a few others, he states his issue with voting to lynch someone who hasn't made a single post, yet we should lynch lurkers. However, in post 32, you voted for WB before he even posted. D1 is filled with joke votes, but your response seemed to come off a serious vote for him. As if trying to start a wagon early on, or more likely, space yourself from another scum. It seems odd you two would vote for each other, post to a OMGUS post, and back off once it was stated it was a "joke".
In post 39, where my issues from reading over D1 really begin, you state Ferm's post are scummy with no real evidence. Nothing developed at this point, but in post 113, you try to start a wagon again. You mention Ferm/Canik being on the fence for stating AbT had some scummy actions, but overall behaves like a townie. Is that not what a majority of people do? Focus on the scummy acts, but pay attention to the overall behavior to avoid a mislynch. However, post 113 seemed to create a lynch wagon for Canik/Ferm. I wouldn't have had much of an issue with that except you didnt even vote for Ferm/Canik until the wagon was started in 123 and once people started paying attention to other potential scum, you seemed to have sole focus on Canik/Ferm and tried to resurrect the wagon in 128 and bring attention away from Robert. You stated Canik made a really townie post when he joined, but refused to remove your vote. When did you remove it? Just before the deadline. My guesses are 1) you hoped you could convince someone on the Robert wagon to switch to Canik's while clearing your name by saying he felt like a townie or 2) you didn't want someone looking back in the event Canik was lynched and appeared townie to see you trying to create a wagon.
In post 241, you mentioned that Lyner was curious of Tw and Rhizo, but never mentioned Lyner and AbT's constant back and forth. You seemed to be jumping on the new wagon of trying to get TW lynched. In that same post, you mention I came off as scummy but list zero examples. Zero. A statement you've made several times, in my opinion, to test the waters with a potential wagon.
In 244, you mentioned how you were coming off as a VT. Isn't everyone going to? I mean you arent going to come out and say you are a scum. The comment just seemed dead weight to me, but it doesn't really indicate any sort of scum behavior.
In 257, you dispute a lot of claims Rhizo made (some familiar to what I mentioned above) and some did give me a slight townie feel from you, however I can't tell if the post is you trying to convince everyone you aren't scum by finding small work-arounds, or if it is truly your reasoning for things.
Post 280 really has no weight for me (like 244), but I wanted to bring out how you said RL has been hectic in earlier post and you bring out you'll response later to the accusations. You did this at the beginning of D2 and didn't seem to respond until you had a comfortable stance to jump into. I'm interested if you'll actually address TW concerns or wait until someone else does it for you, or it just rolls over. I am interested in your response.
Now for suspect #2, Whitebeard.
Whitebeard - Scum - His very first post is directed at Imran and begins the whole OMGUS ordeal. It felt really scummy looking back at it. I post 57, he states AbT behavior won't get him far, but no reasoning. Even a new player knows to include reasoning in most of your posts. He did vote for a no lynch, but wasn't very active in the discussion so that doesn't indicate scum or town behavior to me. Post 102 starts the weird behavior and leads us to the biggest wtf moment of this thread imo, Post 174. Either Whitebeard is a VT who doesnt care much for this game because he doesn't know how to contribute (in which case, a replacement would be nice.) or hes a scum trying to play off with random, nooby behavior. Even as a new player, Whitebeard's style doesn't fit with noob mistakes. It fits with carelessness or purposely trying to misdirect people.
AbT - Town - Early on, Post 70, AbT doesn't react harsh to being accused of being a scum. The way he handled it gave me a townie feel from him. He was very active for a no-lynch, which I doubt any scum would advocate for as much as AbT did. The only scum indicator I really get from him is him being so closely aligned with Imran (which I doubt scum would do, as it'd make them both easy targets) and in Post 226, he mentioned the breadcrumb argument was getting the town nowhere (a point I absolutely agree with, the whole ordeal was pointless.), but continued to participate in the breadcrumb discussion after that post. I just take it as him defending his stance.
CoD - Town - Despite not posting alot, the few post he have made have town written on them. He did bring up the point of not ignoring the Vig (something everyone forgot existed at that point) as it would allow the Mafia to ignore their doctor and save their points. It was an overlooked post, but major town points in my opinion as it brought up a good point. We have to keep the scum guessing on what PR our plan will use.
Myself - I know my role.
Rhizo - On the Fence, leaning scum - Rhizo did spot a flaw in Mandarijn's plan and to me, that was one of the most town-like posts in the thread so far. He voted for no lynch, and was even against the Robert lynch. However, he did try to sneak in the final vote on Canik after Canik made a relatively town post when he joined. Beyond that, he was a large part of the breadcrumb argument that engulfed a lot of D2 and left us with nothing to go on. I felt it was possibly his way of getting the town's attention off of anything relevant. Beyond that, if Rhizo and Imran are both scum and are constantly arguing with each other. Say we lynch one, and they turn up scum. The only would feel safe as he'd appear to be a townie for leading the charge and the town would ignore him, mislynch, and discover this plan too late.
So, in my opinion, the 3 scum are Imran, Whitebeard, and possibly Rhizo.
Vote Imran.
If Imran is scum, Whitebeard would be the next target. However, if Imran is a townie (hopefully not a PR if he does get lynched), it might indicate either Rhizo or TW being a scum. We'd have some information to head into D3 with.