I continue to leave my vote with KevinH for the reason that if we have to lynch a townie, I want it to be one that is not as willing to use his lynch power as others. This gives the players with night kill one less target to pick from. As long as they don't make any overt indication they are anti-town and continue to pick off lynchers eventually, they would have the numbers to win. Not lynching means we let the anti-town roles have their way with us. I want townies with me that will use their lynch power to hunt down anti-towners, its all we got! There aren't going to be many scum-tells this early in the game and thus, assuming we end up lynching a townie due to odds, I want to pick the most deluded poison.
I'd rather not lynch KevinH if its not necessary. As many people have pointed out, vouching for a different strategy isn't necessarily a scum tell. In fact at this point considering my new information about his history using this strategy, I think he is probably town. However, my vote will rest with him because of the reasons I mentioned. If more conclusive evidence comes up of anti-town roles, i'll instantly change my vote. I am not going to condemn anyone for playing a different way than me, its just the best option for now.
I feel like we're collectively closing the discussion on lynch/no lynch so i'll move on.
What is the rationale for voting Sojourner at this point? I missed the posts about the evidence against him. I gathered he is a bandwagoner, is that all we got?