I wouldn't necessary choose one person to vote for. What I mean by that is, I still only have one vote, but as a collective brunch of lynch happy players. I would suggest, putting people at lynch lose 1. We have 11 players, 6 to lynch, and ?4? to lynch by days end. With 11 players, we could put 3 players at one away from day end lynch. After that we watch how the three defend themselves, how people might take there vote off a player if he reaches 4, and so on. No scum, in my opinion would want there scum partner to be at 3 votes, so watching everyone decide where they want there vote to be would developed evidence IMO.
I didn't mean to lynch from the middle. I'm sorry that I miss represented that. I was saying it would be the safe spot, if Scum were killing from the top and town was lynching from the bottom. Posting really just depends on the player themselves. I will always be on the lower end, because I tend to miss speak/miss represent what I'm trying to say, and prefer to watch other players scum hunt. TW will be one always towards the top just like others.
If we did want to put three people to vote for. I wouldn't suggest a highly active scum, I talkative scum is better than a quite one. Though, I wouldn't let post count be my deciding factor. It's all about the action, and content of posting, post count would just be red flag/tie breaker.
However, Ferastical needs to appear, and start speaking, and voting for him will likely do that.
I would suggest everyone vote for someone, but don't add more than 2 on one person, for right now. Who you choose is up to you via whatever info or feeling you got.
Vote Ferastical