Martino ~ This rubs me the wrong way. Obviously you're talking about the four who have voted for SinKon. Why not just come out and say who you are suspicous of then? Why not let the town know your suspicions. Townies have no info from the start, we must collect it as we go. If you think you have information that could help us, why be so ambiguous about it? Tell us, out of the 4, who are the two you think are suspicious and why.
I was talking about those using the AoD was inactive so SinKon must be scum reasoning. Those were CD and Firkked(who did not vote for SinKon but gave his support for the lynch partly based on AoD past behavior). Firkked explained that it was not just the inactivity but also AoD's support of a spreading strategy. That reasoning was good enough for me, so I no longer have any suspicions of Firkked. Which leaves CD who, instead of being able to explain himself, has decided to attack me for questioning the reasoning behind his vote. Further I was just continuing my argument that the bandwagon picked up speed very fast. SinKon did not change his behavior in the last few posts and yet, after Sir Jesus put in the first vote, three others quickly followed. Would they have also voted if Sir Jesus did not? I doubt it.
Also, you said you believe that lynching is protown and it will help us win the game. I found it strange that you said that but then slam on the 4 people that are doing what you said should be done. No one else is even a serious candidate, the next closest has only 1 vote, and the dead line is coming fast. If you think that a Day 1 lynch is necessary then why haven't you done anything to help get a lynch? You said it yourself, you think two out of the four are guilty, why not make a case against one of them?
I never said two out of four ARE guilty. I said I thought that some were looking for an easy lynch, which I found suspicious. While we indeed need a D1 lynch, one important reason for this is information. If everyone would just follow along and jump on the bandwagon, we gain hardly any information. While I would agree that in this scenario even a random lynch is to be preferred over a no lynch(we need to get down to 12 players over 4 rooms), I believe this kind of a random lynch should be a last ditch effort. Not something we start with plenty of discussion time left.
To summarize:
You said lynching is good
You say people are guilty but don't name names or provide evidence (Not helping us lynch)
You criticize people who are doing what you (and others) say is the best course for the town
To me you seem like the guy who wants to sit back and play "I told you so".
FOS: Martino
Now your logic is completely off.
- I did say that lynching is good and I still believe that.
- I told you I was suspicious of those who used AoD's inactivity as reason for their SinKon vote/support of his lynch. Perhaps I could have repeated this in my other post, but I did tell you before where my suspicions lay.
- I criticize people who seemed to be voting for the mere purpose of getting someone lynched. Yes we need a lynch, but that does not mean we should simply lynch the first person that comes to mind.
- If I wanted to say "I told you so", I could have just laid low, watch you mislynch and then come out and blame you guys for mislynching. Instead, I wanted to discuss this issue while we still have a chance to change the outcome.
Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top
