Shahenshah

And then what? The new headline would have been "10,000 out of million Muslims come out to protest, bohoo". Tell me, do you go protest everytime a NATO bomb kills civilians?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/19/several-casualties-reported-after-van-hits-pedestrians-in-north-london

The Top two organisations which were expected to pull most of the crowd pulled out due to disagreements and the whole event was marred with internal disorder between different groups and became a mess, which is sad and allows you to push your conclusions.

He was an assassin. His specific target was Republican Congressmen, not innocent people at random. His intent was to exact revenge on Republicans for Democrats losing an election. Lee Harvey Oswald was an assassin, not a terrorist. Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist. His intent was to make society pay for their policies. Are you personally offended by the "terrorist" label? Yes, I understand now. Republicans winning elections is considered violent extremism. So, to even the score Progressives need to destroy cities, poison the media, disrespect the President, hate your country, incite violence, and refuse to comply with the law. Yes, we are obviously cut from the same cloth. Until you guys can win elections... this is where you will be. Good luck with that. At times, I feel burdened to apologize for actions of people who have nothing to do with me or my religion or my beliefs but who act in the name of my religion.

There's a whole industry in USA whose job is to manage paperwork between the doc and insurances and follow up on those claims. I assume it's bit better now as most insurances have transferred to exchange the information electronically, as opposed to actual paper forms with 50+ fields being sent by mail, what's it called? HCFAs?

Exactly. It seems to me that extremities are getting louder and stronger year by year. Whatever they claim, both groups are, in essence, advocating fascism and collectivism. But the Progressive-SJW crowd worries me more, because it seems to impact academic institutions significantly more than the alt-right. I do wonder why Alt/right has so little presence in Academic, Technological and Scientific institutes...oh wait. What's your point? My point is what do you think is a reason for right wing being so small in academic, technological and scientific circles which are heavily dominated by left wing liberals? What do you think?

but why isn't this terrorism? Clearly a politically motivated attack...whats up?

So tl;dr That boss got fired, new boss came, she was awesome, plenty ofnew projects came, but they shifted her and all the load was back to me with no prospect of raise, I was like, nopes. Found a job, with 25% raise and 33% less work load. Glad things turned out well. o/.

the plan is still alive and is being crystalized, i'll def let you guys know. o/

Politics getting too divisive now in USA. No matter the differences, they need to be settled, at the end of the day, on ballot, not guns, anywhere, under any condition. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/house-majority-whip-scalise-wounded-in-northern-virginia-shooting-reports-of-multiple-shots-fired-239539 Looks like a political ideological attack, does that constitute terrorism?

Now now he's a good man, can we keep this under the cloud.

Exactly. It seems to me that extremities are getting louder and stronger year by year. Whatever they claim, both groups are, in essence, advocating fascism and collectivism. But the Progressive-SJW crowd worries me more, because it seems to impact academic institutions significantly more than the alt-right. I do wonder why Alt/right has so little presence in Academic, Technological and Scientific institutes...oh wait.

Well, right wing solution to most of the world problems are "Eliminate X group/number of people". Not shocking. Also not shocking is lack of believe in science.

Yea, this is just beyond ridiculous, one of the asshole was in a documentary, was reported more than once over a period of time by neighbours and freinds. Had his views openly stated on tv show, was kicked out of mosques, more than once etc. What more do they want people and the communities to do? Honestly, dont buy they dont have money to monitor people on 'the list'. They politicians can arrange the money if this was a bigger priority. Cant blame Police, people or anyone, but just the politicians and their priorities. I suppose terror and fear here and there helps them, keep people diverted from more crucial issues that affects thousands/millions in overall scheme of things.

Of course not. His top priority is the United States of America... that's why I like him You're intelligent enough to know what I mean. You deflected because you know that ISIS isnt at top of the hit list of USA, which is unfortunate.

Of course you can crack down on ideologies! Violently or not, Islamists ultimately strive to topple states and instill their ideologies as rule of the land. It's a clear cut threat to national security and should be dealt with accordingly. No need to throw everyone in jail right away, but maybe cutting state funding to Islamist-related organizations posing as "congregations" and "charities" would be a good start. Banning them would be even better. I will not argue that Western Foreign Policy in the Middle East is FUBAR, as it clearly is. This is another example. What is your definition of Islamist? Is ISIS his top priority?

This is more like enemy of enemy of enemy of enemy of enemy of.....

Welp!, turns out Abedi snr was part of the 'Islamist proxy' used by mi5 for regime change in Libya. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4540822/Rebels-went-Libya-MI5-blessing-amid-Abedi-probe.html Another adventureous foreign policy coming home to roost! What did these idiots reckon was going to happen after making NATO act as Airforce of Al Qaeda and ISIS in Libyan Regime change? Think those uprisings were lad by Jeffersonion Democrats? Turns out they were extremists being kept in line by Gaddafi. Like it or not, Corbyn is right on point when he said this is connected to bad foreign policy. Too bad, most people won't be informed enough or be able to connect the dots.

Lol, it's like kinder garden all over again

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/24/us-officials-leak-more-manchester-details-hours-after-uk-rebuke "The reporter Richard Engel of NBC tweeted details not released by the UK. Engel said US intelligence officers told him family members of the the killer, Salman Abedi, had warned UK security officials about him and had described him as dangerous." wtf were they waiting for?

They need to start cracking down ASAP. Start with the hate preachers. The sermons have to be authorised by Govt. Those already in jails should be sent to solitary confinements. Stop letting people exploit free speech to spread hatred. They can monitor everything on internet, vpn, no vpn whatever, start knocking out all forms of propaganda, why the fuck does Twitter/FB even allow terrorist sympathisers/accounts...why the fuck arent they banned? Stop dissemination of the wrong message. Deport those who dont like the constitution, preferably south pole, no one would want the scum back anyway. Stop ghettoisation and/or localisation of towns and cities, no integration = bubye.

A typical "Deflect and muddy the waters" response.

Alternatively, what could also be logical is that the guards may have have been attacked and provoked first and then responded. Conveniently, we have no video of when it started. Outcome being bad PR, either way, it's stupid for the staff to have responded in kind, because only they'll get the bad coverage as Erdogan is the up and coming bogeyman and they should have known better. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4513490/Turkish-president-s-bodyguards-attack-protesters-DC.html

Any video which shows who started the fight?.