Khandov

"So what you gonna do, go ban an AK? My shit wasn't registred any-f**-way!" - Ice Cube.

Sightseeing in Paris.. noice.

Hmm. Lightining usually ends up in burns anyways, so diffrence is not so big.

Rise of Nations. it's one of these I want to get so much but am too busy with S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

All you who complain about bygone RTS era being dead since EA raped C&C franchise, wipe your tears and grab your vuwuzelas. Act of Agression will resurrect the oldschool RTS genre and we will greet Eugene Systems as heroes.

Hilary's candidacy seems to be hilarious. Plough Hilary. If they want real Red, they should get Lizzy. Democrat's only sensible choice is Biden. As for GOP... they have big yes and often big noes, but I seem to watch too little CNN to care enough about noes.

You still have to take care of Boko Haram.

Moral: Khandov told you so. Although I was more for him simply sitting at his dacza, hugging his waifu: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/720/084/768.png

I find it interesting that so many call him a corpse here. You want this, still all we have are inclinations of severy disease. Nothing less. If he dies, it will be sure CIA-y.

Looks to me like some sort of troll test. It was only partially true to me.

So much is being said here and yet the only sentence I will share with you is.. "Not our war. We ought to have known that right from the start."

Of course hard. And really, dogma is just like power. It can be used for both right and wrong.

Atheism is a belief, just as any religion is. The only diffrence is, it is belief in God's non-existance. So why would he snap sooner? PC, not atheism, is the master race. I do not want to blame the general atheism itself, for atrocities of that killer, Mao Zedong, or Stalin. Just as no religion should be blamed for things like ISIS or 9/11.

The question I'd ask is: Would he have been as hostile if they were not muslim, or did not have a middle eastern appearance? The offender was clearly anti-religion to a sever degree. Naturally, he would be more hostile towards a group of people he knew were religous; evident by the hijab and other physical features. So I would say no, he wouldn't have been as hostile towards them if they were not muslim. So Yes I do believe it is a hate crime. Alright, so we know two things. 1- Sane person does not kill people over a parking dispute 2- Sane person does not kill people over their religion. In other words, this would never happen if the perpetrator would not be unhinged. Unknown to me if his clearly militant atheism was a cause or a result of his lack of sanity. This is not about hate crime, or a parking dispute. The primary reason behind this attack, was the insanity of one person. Just look at Al-Jazeera, they do that hard. The moment we stop blaming the whole religions/communities for wrongdoings of the insane few, the moment we support them in thwarting the growth of such element, is the moment we will be on a good way.

An event that confirms what many of us knew already; that Western media do not care about consistency of fair reporting, only about the goals of those who invest in them. No problems about generalizing against islam, but when events give opportunity to do the same with their favorite belief.. (Yes, atheism IS a belief, in God's non-existance), nu-uuh. The only fair thing that can be said about it is: You can ostracize Islam for the deeds of violent few, but do remember this hurts ordinary Muslims as much as the rest and they need our support in combatting radicalism, not being pushed right into its embrace.