Khandov

"So what you gonna do, go ban an AK? My shit wasn't registred any-f**-way!" - Ice Cube.

Sightseeing in Paris.. noice.

Hmm. Lightining usually ends up in burns anyways, so diffrence is not so big.

Rise of Nations. it's one of these I want to get so much but am too busy with S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

All you who complain about bygone RTS era being dead since EA raped C&C franchise, wipe your tears and grab your vuwuzelas. Act of Agression will resurrect the oldschool RTS genre and we will greet Eugene Systems as heroes.

Hilary's candidacy seems to be hilarious. Plough Hilary. If they want real Red, they should get Lizzy. Democrat's only sensible choice is Biden. As for GOP... they have big yes and often big noes, but I seem to watch too little CNN to care enough about noes.

You still have to take care of Boko Haram.

Moral: Khandov told you so. Although I was more for him simply sitting at his dacza, hugging his waifu: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/720/084/768.png

I find it interesting that so many call him a corpse here. You want this, still all we have are inclinations of severy disease. Nothing less. If he dies, it will be sure CIA-y.

Looks to me like some sort of troll test. It was only partially true to me.

So much is being said here and yet the only sentence I will share with you is.. "Not our war. We ought to have known that right from the start."

Of course hard. And really, dogma is just like power. It can be used for both right and wrong.

Atheism is a belief, just as any religion is. The only diffrence is, it is belief in God's non-existance. So why would he snap sooner? PC, not atheism, is the master race. I do not want to blame the general atheism itself, for atrocities of that killer, Mao Zedong, or Stalin. Just as no religion should be blamed for things like ISIS or 9/11.

The question I'd ask is: Would he have been as hostile if they were not muslim, or did not have a middle eastern appearance? The offender was clearly anti-religion to a sever degree. Naturally, he would be more hostile towards a group of people he knew were religous; evident by the hijab and other physical features. So I would say no, he wouldn't have been as hostile towards them if they were not muslim. So Yes I do believe it is a hate crime. Alright, so we know two things. 1- Sane person does not kill people over a parking dispute 2- Sane person does not kill people over their religion. In other words, this would never happen if the perpetrator would not be unhinged. Unknown to me if his clearly militant atheism was a cause or a result of his lack of sanity. This is not about hate crime, or a parking dispute. The primary reason behind this attack, was the insanity of one person. Just look at Al-Jazeera, they do that hard. The moment we stop blaming the whole religions/communities for wrongdoings of the insane few, the moment we support them in thwarting the growth of such element, is the moment we will be on a good way.

An event that confirms what many of us knew already; that Western media do not care about consistency of fair reporting, only about the goals of those who invest in them. No problems about generalizing against islam, but when events give opportunity to do the same with their favorite belief.. (Yes, atheism IS a belief, in God's non-existance), nu-uuh. The only fair thing that can be said about it is: You can ostracize Islam for the deeds of violent few, but do remember this hurts ordinary Muslims as much as the rest and they need our support in combatting radicalism, not being pushed right into its embrace.

I knew already that the EU is right now in trouble. But as I found out from US friend, the US has decreased production of oil, in response to OPEC's operation of flooding the market with it. It will resume on full speed once the prices are back to normal. It is most likely that OPEC decreased the prices that way, due to pressure of the US. Now, Russia already is panting hard on those developments, given how reliant it is on fossil fuels. This whole debacle is not only heavily connected to all kind of conflcts, it looks like a conflict itself, one fought with and against the resources and economies. Of course, at the current state, Europe is doomed to lose more than gain, given how it's holding together.

Like it or not, every major power and especially the US gov, thinks according to attitude "If me steal cow, good. If other steal my cow, bad". So far, Im unable to name any exception. It was a mistake on Russian side to fuel conflict in East Ukraine; while the takeover of Crimea was Putin's success, all the East Ukraine has brought him, are sanctions. Let me elaborate on this already filling post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia Seems the attitude "If our nazism, whatever, if their nazism, bad", is also applicable to Ukraine. And Russia too.

This essentially says that Hillary Clinton is no worse than Bush, in starting wars. Good luck running now, Hillary, you'll need it... *evil laugh*

What would you base your conclusion on? You would have to assume that the American voters will repeat what they did in 2008 and elect Hillary based on a desire to make history. She has never accomplished a thing. She was suppose to be the shoe-in for the Dem nomination in '08 along with Rudy Giuliani for the GOP, and we all saw what happened. She is trying to delay announcing until July and pressure Trey Gowdy to hold Benghazi hearings before the stonewalling State Dept. is forced to release all the documents... and secret tapes of Dennis Kucinich and the Libyan Government have just come out with her pressing for war in Libya under false pretenses. Sound familiar? She may end up not running at all. She was fine Secretary of State, but as I speak, he campaign makes nothing clear about her. Anyway, I do not look forward to see her running, let alone presidenting. I would prefer Joe Biden out of Democrats. US would be better off with Joe Biden as the president with Obama as a vice-president, not other way around. My thoughts of GOP are rather chalk of aversion to the name "Bush", Mitt Roomney and few fine thoughts about Ron Paul. None of them are properly argumented.

Their foreign policy is more or less in lockstep with US foriegn policy , perhaps you were alluding to their internal policies? Well, atleast they arent an aparthied state. Possession of Bible is a criminal offence there, punishable by jail and no change will occur there. They need to drop their oil somewhere.Its "cool" because of the oil. They also got financing ISIS back at them like a tomahawk; one of their generals died of the IS bomb attack. Now they will press their big brother to keep throwing drones at that Desert Vietnam.

90 is not short.. and now it looks like Saudi Arab crown will change heads swiftly.

US just keeps escalating the violence, with their drones and arming every single anti-dictatorial guerilla. Maybe they do not even care that the more people die in that place, the more powerful the radicals become. I hate to repeat things after people, but just as Fox Fire said; nothing was learned from Vietnam. Obama has contributed to Middle-east bloodshed more than Bush could ever hope to. On the other hand, I seriously doubt that US is even able to stop messing around with it. Just like Vietnam withdrawl triggered half million people escaping with boats from communist regime, unchecked IS will kill everything it sees. Such terrorist army is fire, that came out of control. IS can destroy, but I don't see it building anything significant. And no, I have no good solution to end this madness either.

Your wish is my command; One russian hitman incoming for you. ETA: 8 hours. http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/WnGIaBRCMFrl.jpg

No, all the other Christian denominations are sects of the Catholic Church. Indeed. To elaborate, for me, the begin of the Catholic Church is when Jesus told Peter to watch over his herd. If you do not see it that way, then sure you might disagree, but still it was Peter and friends who were the first apostoles. Meaning the catholic church was the first Christian church.

It seems onbekende gets it.