Kitkat16

o_O Why did he even claim the name Yoda in the first place given that we were explicitly told names had nothing to do with our alignment? (i.e. you could have a mafia Yoda) Also lol. I enjoyed your post.

I was going to vote Rafay, but it's a good point about not ending the day early...... not much to say though. Still, thought I'd show my face here.

how is it? We only have 2 choices, both which there are very flimsy cases against. 3 dead tonight is better than 4 atm and 3 people are going tonight. My biggest scum target is Rafay, unfortunately I can't vote for him. Or he may just see this and get his buddies to kill me Simply because we can then analyse the wagon. The more information we have to go on, the better. Then again, you might have a point in that with three more people down tonight statistically we have a greater chance of hitting scum tomorrow. But we won't have any more information to go on.

Alright. I think it's more advantageous to the town to lynch today than to not. I have no idea whether Canik is town or not. But I'm pretty sure Brewers IS town. Therefore, I'm going to place my lynch on Canik. Vote: Canik

I am *SO* not a lurker. :v

OK. On second thoughts, I believe you. You're coming across as town to me.

​Not really, it doesn't seem to be a great indication of who is scum or not. In the Pick Your Power game the 2 scum we've killed stayed off the town-lynching wagons. Doesn't mean there won't ever be scum on town wagons we know one scum (Lord MK) was on the Imran wagon but there's a good chance many of them are town. We also know one scum (iSoc) was no voting. I do agree that not all the scum are likely to be on Imran's wagon. But as you say iSoc wasn't voting.

@Canik How exactly am I any more scummy than Yehom or Lachiton, when as you rightly observe I voted for the same person as they did yesterday? (i.e. Brewers.) Aren't the people who voted for an actual townie (Imran) scummier? What exactly have I said which is more dodgy than Yehom or Lach's posts? Yeah, I've been quiet today. So has everyone. I haven't had much to say, and I don't make posts saying that I have nothing to say because I know from experience that I am then accused of trying to get my post count up with fluff. I HAVE stirred stuff up though where I can, e.g. boldly being the first one to accuse Lego of fakeclaiming, and later Brewers too.

Agreed with Yehom. Brewers, you should be roleclaiming, now.

of course there's an SK, FoS everyone who is even still debating it

I couldn't find any other variants but, doesn't this mean that either of them has to be the gladiator? Seems brewers doesn't know about this, so Canik must be the gladiator. Canik why do you want to lynch brewers? o_O @KevinH Please clarify how the gladiator role works. Is the gladiator sometimes a town role? If not, does that mean that one of either Canik or Brewers is definitely scum? Isn't that kind of idiotic given that if we get it wrong we'll lynch the other person next round?

Well that's just frigging brilliant. If the gladiator is a scum role it means he has picked two people who are (in all probability) non-mafia and therefore there's no point in lynching either of them. It deprives town of one day's lynch, in effect.

OK. But you're going to vote to lynch me for THAT? Really?

What, precisely, is a terrible habit? Making mistakes?

I placed a vote on someone originally, then removed it to place on the other person I thought had roleclaimed who actually had a chance at being lynched, only to find out that I got the wrong guy. It's really not that complicated, dude.

Oh, whoops. That was a complete mistake on my part. Unvote Vote: Brewers

The point is that in *my* eyes, I don't think either of them are more suspicious than the other. They both made weird roleclaims; they're both dodgy. If CoD had roleclaimed first I'd have voted for him instead of Lego originally.

There's no great mystery to it. I find Lego and CoD equally suspicious because the reasons for lynching them are identical. Nobody is voting for Lego so it's a wasted vote. I'm transferring it to CoD instead.

Unvote Vote: CoD

A second RC is weird, but as I find them both equally suspicious I'm not changing my vote.

Fwiw, my vote is staying right where it is. I urge you all to actually consider what I said.

the psychiatrist? lawl

OK, let's make things interesting. I don't believe you. Reloader seems a nice, convenient safe roleclaim to throw town off the scent. And I can't imagine why you would roleclaim when scum could target you the very next night. That, combined with the fact that you were already somewhat under suspicion, is super dodgy. Vote: Lego

How in the world did that happen? Bummed that we lost two PRs. It looks like we have a town vigilante in play, probably with more than one shot or he/ she wouldn't have spent it on the first night. But jeez, two mafia night kills is pretty intense.

Alright, fine. I remove my no lynch vote and place it on Jazzy. I'm not sold that he's scum necessarily (voting for someone else to get the heat off yourself could just be a noob error) but if it means we'll get more information by analysing the wagon, I'm prepared to do it. Jazzy, if you are by chance a PR role, I suggest you roleclaim right now. Ordinarily roleclaiming is a bad idea, but given that you face the noose imminently in any event, I think it's worth saying. It's a normal last-roll-of-the-dice move for people facing a lynch, and I'd prefer not to lynch a potential PR if you really are one. Also, if you name the PR role you have, it helps us further to determine whether you're telling the truth.