Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

IRON Forums Website

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Kitkat16

NM⎪Inactive
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kitkat16

  1. Nope, only one person lynched per day.
  2. The first person to reach two is lynched, all other things being equal.
  3. Vote: Rafay There is surely going to be at least one scum off the original wagon, giving us a 50/50 chance of getting a scum imo. Better odds than voting for someone on the wagon. If Rafay flips town, SBG is next.
  4. I actually found this quite funny. Please don't change the requirements.
  5. Having read over this thread: @Rafay I am seriously considering voting for you. What do you have to say for yourself? I'm sorry for my general lack of activity everyone but (a) I really am horrendously busy irl and ( the rest of you are horrendously inactive as well.
  6. I know this will probably make me look scummy, but I am overwhelmingly busy irl today with an assignment. I just can't spend time properly engaging with this game, but I'm really not a mafia I swear (lol). I *WILL* make some productive posts later. What I will say is that I am annoyed at MK picking on me for inactivity when everyone was being bloody inactive yesterday (and just generally.)
  7. I placed a vote with the explicit intention of trying to encourage him to say something, and said I would be willing to withdraw my vote. I tagged him to that effect (why would I try to make sure he saw the wagon if I were scum?) I had explicitly cautioned against ending the day early so was surprised when iSoc hammered the vote. I didn't ensure ending the day early at all. It would've been fine had iSoc not placed the final vote. Another thing you need to note is that my original vote on SBG was a lulz vote, so it wasn't like I was switching my vote from a serious candidate to another serious candidate, which is always a suspicious act. I agree with your analysis that there's at least one scum on the wagon. My two top suspects are MK and iSoc. MK, for much the same reasons you do. iSoc, because unlike me he *actually* changed his vote from a serious candidate, was the hammer *AND* ended the day early to boot. But I also want to point out that there is probably a scum off the wagon as well, and I think it's notable that the guy who gets knocked off is also the guy who voted for Rafay. I'm not quite prepared to FoS Rafay, but I certainly have my eye on him.
  8. Could we replace Rafay too... lol
  9. If you're referring to me, yes I did say that. Once. How terrible of me. :v I've been checking this thread regularly to see if anyone says anything of substance. The holdup is KC and Rafay being super inactive. I thought this would turn into an epic showdown between them and the rest of us where they passionately defended themselves against accusations of being scum and just said they'd been inactive and it didn't really matter and us on the other hand saying it would be better to lynch inactives and then someone getting lynched and us analysing the wagon. Instead this has been super lame.... Unvote: SBG Vote: KC. I'm prepared to unvote you, but start talking or face the noose.
  10. @Rafay Show yourself! (If you don't get the reference, I will be disappointed in you all)
  11. I would caution against ending the day early, as the more the conversation goes on, the more info we get.
  12. Kudos to you though for trying to find something out of nothing by correlating the post content and difference in post time between mine and brewers to say we are in cahoots with each other and can be scum Actually I have more suspicions on Kitkat than you at this point. If we consider you town, then It is very likely that Kitkat conveniently decided to latch on to a confirmed townie's choice so that if questioned about it, he can ride on the coattails of your defense and clear his name. Or if it doesn't work, have his possible scum partner SeaBee come out with a lulz post and cast a joke vote on him, with him returning the favor, all in a lighter mood . lol. I didn't have any deep and meaningful reasons for my vote. It was getting late on in the day and I didn't have time to read through all the posts and give a considered vote due to extreme rl busyness. (I've just finished marking an enormous pile of uni essays, and it has absolutely done my head in. x_x) K is for KitKat (which has two Ks) and Killer.
  13. Vote: SBG for being perma scum
  14. When will you learn that SBG is perma-scum?
  15. That last sentence is a good point, and another reason you guys shouldn't suspect me (especially given that my vote was quite late on in voting.)
  16. Honestly not seeing how having a different preference as to the assigned roles means I'm any more likely to be a scum. It's not like roleblocker was a terrible choice.
  17. Vote: Cop Vote: Roleblocker
  18. No, it was just genuinely unclear. "During the first Day, instead of lynching, all players will vote on two roles from the following list which will replace two random townies'." That is not clear whether it means that we place one vote each which counts towards the two slots, or whether we get two votes for the two roles.
  19. Are we allowed two votes for the townie roles, or just one? I think cop is pretty much a done deal, so I might place my vote on something else. I'm thinking doctor, it's probably the strongest role after cop? (Do we know if the doctor role would have unlimited protection opportunities, or whether it has just one or two shots? That might change things... watchers etc have unlimited right?)
  20. Whoever the scum is, is active enough to have killed Rhizo last night. It's not an inactive, or at least I doubt it. Just saying guys, do you really think if I was the scum I'd have killed off Rhizo of all people? (Not that it matters now that I'm past four lynch votes.)
  21. OK, I'm dead then. As you will find out soon enough, I was VT, which frankly anyone with half a brain should have known. FoS Rafay for ending the day early.
  22. OK so let's set aside the fact that Rhizo said I was unlikely to be scum, and go off his reasoning, which was sound. Who the *heck* would draw attention to themselves so spectacularly by having a feud with Rhizo when, if I were a scum, I could sit back and make mundane posts and stay out of the spotlight? I wasn't in any great danger of being lynched at the time. Neither is it as if my reasoning were poor. As Kevin (who is now dead) acknowledged, voting for Rhizo was the best choice at the time for a townie given his last minute voting change. It now transpires that he was a townie but I stand by my statement that he was the best choice available. Kevin agreed, and he was an unbiased townie without any agenda. I had nothing better to go on. Given that I was making the best vote I could in the circumstances, I think you should reconsider lynching me. Incidentally, there's something I wish I could say here, but can't for strategic reasons because it might interfere with scum's strategy. But that in itself (the fact that it might affect scum gameplay) is a hint about what I'm referring to. I hope I'm not being too blatant, hopefully it'll be slightly more clear in retrospect. When I flip town tonight, bear it in mind.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.