Kitkat16

Just so everyone is aware, in a couple of days I am going on holiday for about a week. I'll have internet access but only from my phone, so my posts here will be more sporadic than usual.

vote: no lynch

it could mean that one of the people kits talking about is the fruit vendor, further proving their innocence. Im in the Personal Relations For Ninok Times Department, and i can tell you kits death struck us all hard. may kit go to kitkat bar heaven.(mm) *i wonder if my wife is making lasagna tonight, that sounds good. She can make a mean meatloaf!* I know I'm no longer supposed to post, but I think I can get away with a row of smug emoticons at this post. :smug: :smug:

Inactivity is normally the major reason for D1 lynches, but given the length of the day and the amount of players we're going to have plenty of time to start to see posting tendencies and perhaps patterns that may move the light on someone one way or the other Inactivity is usually the go to for a D1 lynch if there is a lynch to be had. Not much really gets shown or discovered D1, but with that being said I have picked up on little tells D1 that have later been true (been wrong as well), so D1 isn't a total waste. Though personally I don't usually get into the whole spam postings and voting and unvoting that people love to do D1 to make themselves look active. Some do, and that's fine, but people making pointless posts D1 does not gain anyone town points in my eyes. Jazzy seems like a new player, I'm not really buying into all the suspicion being thrown here way. There was another game when a new player made a pretty scummy move and it got wrote off as a new player error... Turned out he was actually a scum though and they won because he didn't get lynched... @The Warrior knows what I'm talking about, was very frustrating Not frustrating for all of us, bro.

Ahahaha, called it. It was too obvious I was a townie for me to continue to live. But scum got played: I deliberately set myself up to take the fall so that none of our PRs would get lynched. Seeya suckers, and good luck town!

people have been lynched for less then this. @kit Kat. Who talks like that. I don't use that word unless I want to be sarcastic. people who speak correct english

But I thought you couldn't vote for yourself. nope. I don't vote for people who I know are town. VOTE VGMMASTER your criminal misuse of grammar is a dead giveaway robert (it's "whom" not "who" when speaking of the object of the sentence) unvote vote: robert

can you please stop debating the merits of the prequels etc in a mafia thread for the sole purpose of boosting your post counts without saying anything relevant to the game

Do we have to participate verbally/ with audio, or can we just type? If the latter, I'm in.

I shall reply to you fluff post w/ a fluff vote. Vote: KitKat. scum civil war Vote: Rafay also given i had nothing to go on you could hardly expect a non-fluff post and you know it so voting for me on those grounds is a sure sign you are scum, here you go guys we should just lynch rafay and end the day already i solved it

I loved the reference to the opening text of Star Wars movies. Also, first. Also I, Imran and Rafay are scum. Am I telling the truth or am I not? Commence the exact same squabbling as in the last mafia game when I pulled this exact same ploy.

Don't know if it's too late to stop anything, but unvote: GoldIron Unanimous votes on someone are suspicious to me, scum would be frantically trying to talk us out of it if he were mafia

Unvote Lachiton Vote GoldIron Someone that inactive is better off lynched. My previous vote was on Lachiton, but I think the reason Lach is going after me is not that he is scum but that he has assumptions about me from the last mafia game. [but for the record bro just because I was scum last time doesn't mean that I'm a million times more likely than anyone else in this game to be scum and you should really factor that in before you go lynching the wrong guy. Just sayin'.] But I got the better of him last time (among my many other virtues I am gracious in victory) so I understand his scepticism.

boooooooring (just sayin') it wasn't a C grade movie but nor was it an A. I'd rate it B, maybe B+ if I were feeling generous.

join the club man, join the club

yes and in the meantime i get lynched, sounds like a great plan, a real winner

guys as amused and flattered as i am that you're still discussing this if i and/or tw and robert were scum then outing myself and/or them would be insanely dumb. my joke is better read as what it is: a joke

+1 townie points for the lengthy analysis in this post. In my experience, scum don't tend to bother with time consuming analysis.

actually I was on three votes and you need four to get lynched so I, as usual, am right

how quick i removed my vote from who? and also, while Mk did state that the rules prohibit someone from outing their scum buddies, what would actually happen if they did? for example would there have been any blow back if katkat actually did? and would it just be private where we dont know about it? cause if thats the case, even if we did the kitkat thing ive mentioned, it would not preclude TW and robert from being scum. with that being said, im still keeping my vote on kitkat, under the assumption that something would have happened if he did indeed break the rules like that. if MK tells us it would be handled privately and there is no way we would ever find out that a rule was broken during the game, then that strategy is kind of pointless like TW and vgm indicated Last time KitKat actually outed his buddies, the game got reset. @KevinH can confirm that, And once I challenged the reasoning behind the GoldIron's wagon, you removed your vote. Now whether that was because you wanted to avoid attention or you felt GoldIron may not be the best lynch is up in the air. At the moment, I think lynching lego would give us a better idea of your standings, as well as KitKat's, seeming that Lego keeps going for that lynch. Beyond that, his FoS on GoldIron and dragging attention to him, lynching Lego also gains us information there. the more I thought about GoldIron the more it just seemed like he made a newbie mistake and didn't know how the roles were assigned, and it would be crappy to vote of a new guy just cause he wasn't sure how roles were assigned. And for his activity, i havent really seen him on at all so it makes sense he is busy or just not able to log in, or hell he might just not care. so that is why i took my vote off him and i truly feel that if MK would do something like reset the game for a violation like that, and we would be made aware of it, if kitkat was scum, it would take both TW and robert out of the question. therefore, assuming scum kill town n1, that would mean there would be a 25% chance d2 any lynch would be scum and with the power roles, i think it would give town a HUGE edge. most likely a townie is gonna die with a lynch today, but i think this honestly gives us the best overall odds of winning the game except it doesn't because i'm not scum and you'll be right back where you started in the morning

41/60. Pretty average.

btw there are now three votes on me of which at least one and probably two are almost certainly town, so well done on putting a townie within hammer range of scum guys (as you will find out soon enough) http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/013/974/clap.gif

oh dear god we're still on the joke post i can absolutely assure you that nothing useful will come of lynching me but incidentally if I do get lynched and come out town, I do not want it overlooked that it was brewers who proposed lynching me. he should be your #1 suspect as soon as I flip town enjoy guys

Fair comment.