Immigration, in whatever form, had no contributing factor to 9/11. It is for stances lik this that you get looked sideways at.
Do you just wake up and start typing stupid stuff? Were the 9/11 terrorists born in the USA? No. They were not. Did they legally, or illegally, enter the USA? Yes. They did. That's called immigration, in every form. Did they have a contributing factor in the 9/11 terrorist attack? Yes. They did. So, immigration played a fundamental factor in the 9/11 terrorist attack on New York City.
.
And I am merely stating that stopping any type of "illegal" immigraton wouldn't have stopped 9/11 one bit. They all (nearly all, 1 got denied and had to be replaced) came over completely legal and more then likely would also be permitted entry in any immigration scenario expect a full lock-down of the USA.
They didn't immigrate to immigrate, they came to do harm to the USA. At best blame your intelligence agency's then, cause it sure isn't your border security guy at the airports duty to catch these kind of plots.
.
While both closing the border completely (however impracticle to downright impossible it is) and mandating Mexico to "end the migration", it wouldn't stop it from happening anyway.
Closing the border with Mexico is easy. We close the ports of entry. That means nothing gets in legally. No people, no trucks, no trains. Zero commerce. Mexico cannot live a day without commerce with the USA. Mexico would immediately stop the migrations.
.
So you stop any "legal" entry. Gratz?
Both sides need eachother, while Mexico will lose income (aka jobs and export) the US will lose cheap labor and goods. There is a reason why you guys have so many border corssings and they are still heavily congested.
.
Heck then you just move the issue to the Mexico <=> Belize/Guatemale border and I doubt it would affect much.
I have always favored taking over Mexico... and every Mexican I have ever talked to wishes we would do it. Lots of beachfront property, abundant oil reserves, hard working citizens, crushed cartels, and a little skinny border to the south to defend. It's perfect.
.
Funny, just know that I doubt any Republican will be overjoyed by the prospect of all those latino voters (regardless of party affiliation).
Heck, most of the "goals" can be accomplished just by being a nice neighbour and *gasp* international aid. Why you need to go all imperialistic on them is something only history can educate you on.
.
Rasmussen is known to poll couple % to the GOP
Rasmussen has been pretty damn accurate since I began following their polling back in 2004. I have no need for other polling except to laugh at how wrong they have been. I have never listened to Fox News polls because they pay outside polling companies to do their work, and they have been all wrong.
.
Rasmussed had Clinton on +2% on election night, all were in the +1 to +4% range, which is spot-on for statistics. I can't seem to find them assigning electoral college seats to those numbers, but seeing as they are only patting themselfes on the back for being very close to the eventual +2,1% win for Clinton, I can't really assume them being better then the rest.
.
You do know that this growth has been going for atleast 122 months now
I know what you're trying to say... Obama spent his entire 8 years in office blaming George W. Bush for his crappy economy, and now they all want to take credit for the economy under Trump. No one is gonna believe that, and if they say they do, they know it's a lie.
.
And yet Trump wants to claim none of the economic drive that happended during Obama's time actually happended. Currently at best most economists are agreeing that Trump hasn't yet derailed the US economy, but he sure aint helping or boosting it.
.
Says the guy voting for the party that keeps trying to destroy anything healthcare related.
No not at all. Just doing all I can to destroy involvement of the Federal Government in healthcare.
.
No more Medicaid/Medicare then I guess? Also goodbye the VE? (thou that was a GOP plan last I heared).
.
Yes adapt, that IS the Paris Accords, that ARE all the climate change debates about.
We can adapt just fine on our own. I don't like people telling me what to do, especially European Socialists.
.
But thats the thing, you guys aren't adopting at all. Heck you guys aren't even really reacting post-crisis. Then again you could partially blame beaurocracy for that.
And I guess its good I aint a communist anymore, I guess.
.
We do not have the production to cut off China. where would we get stuff?
omg... Where do we get stuff? It sounds like you're addicted to China. We can make our own stuff, or trade with others for stuff. China has only been in the WTO since 2001. The likelihood that the USA will sever trade with China just multiplied yesterday. They devalued their currency into the basement to make their exports as cheap as possible to mitigate the effects of our tariffs. Who didn't see that coming? In turn, the USA has designated China as a currency manipulator. The free trade world cannot trade with a Communist nation. They steal our intellectual property, put millions of Americans out of work, never honor our copyrights, and force their people to work for slave pay. We don't need China.
.
Lots to unpack here, but lets start.
- You do make alot of your own stuff, just know that those factories also run on Chinese imports like steel.
- WTO membership didn't just make China magically open its borders and start trading with the USA, they already did before.
- And that likelyhood just dropped cause Trump doesn't want to impose tariff's on Christmas shoppers...
- The Yuan was propped UP by China the past years, so basically the opposite! They "released" that pressure and thus the yuan fell to a more capitalistic true mean.
- Yuan going down means the chinese will earn LESS on exports, sure the product becomes cheaper for export but they receive less money for it AND their imports become more expensive. The only "hurt" it did on the tariffs is that the amount to be received diminshed (hello more deficit!).
- Yes you will need it in your capitalistic system, cause just patriotism doesn't mean squatch when people can buy the same stuff at half the price when its imported.
.
Almost all the American production companies moved out of the USA, the factories are gone
They can come back if they want... sounds like you're against American manufacturing.
.
Sure they can come back, at a cost.
.
The fact is China has us right where they want us and cutting trade with them hurts us much more than it hurts them
What the hell are you watching? The only people that care about China are all those mega corporations like Apple that get their techno-crack addicting products created for pennies on the backs of slave labor. China poops out tons of cheap garbage to fill the shelves of Walmart. Amazon is making billions hawking their trash. Aren't these the companies you guys are always complaining about? I don't buy anything from China, and if it's not available, no one else will buy it either. China absolutely needs our cash much more than we need their crap.
.
I call shenanigans, you do buy from China. If you don't want to see it is up to you.
And first you mark them up as a slave holding communist state with little to no morals during there business deals and now you think they need US $$? You think China is only running a trade surplus with the USA? Who has been teaching you economics?
.
Democrats run on emotions, and they never think about the consequences of what they do... they just blame Republicans.
.
I wil re-iterate: "It is for stances like this that you get looked sideways at."
Both your sides are drama queens!
.
You say we don't need China yet here we have farmers going bankrupt because of the trade war and China being relatively unaffected, last I checked soy bean farmers aren't massive corporations.
They are farmers... they grow what they can sell... if they can't sell what they grow... grow something else. That's Capitalism.
.
Then why is the USA subsidizing alot of farmers over missed exports? Smells like socialism...
.
No one wants to spend 30 bucks on an American made chair that is the same quality as a $12 one made from China, and we aren't going to cut them off because Trump wants to get reelected.
We buy what is for sale. We go shopping, we pick what we want, we decide what we will pay for it... and that's it. No one buys anything because it's from China, but there are many that won't buy it because it's from China. If there are no products made in China available to purchase, then no one will even know about it. Your argument becomes meaningless.
.
Will die by Capitalism, wants to be a protectionist.
Choose 1 please.
.
The GOP is largely all talk except when it comes to giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
I'm not wealthy, and I got a tax cut. Something Democrats don't understand... it's not their money to decide how much of our money we get to keep... and the GOP does a lot to prevent big government from encroaching, and interfering, in our lives.
.
Excellent, what was your tax cut, in numbers if possible, in percentage if desired. Please also state howmuch was absorbed by increase in the cost of living and inflation.
Except on morals, for those the GOP wouldn't mind a Saudi styled morals police I'd guess.