Sounds like a tea-party playbook scenario. Speaking of them, where are they now when Trump is piling up dept?
We are still here, and like I have already said many times, Trump never promised to cut spending... he promised to increase it. Trump spent a ton on the military, which I fully support. He had to trade a lot to get that military spending, but we forgive him for that. Strange that Democrats are suddenly becoming deficit hawks, and are trying to use government spending as an issue against Trump... but we're smarter than that. We know what to expect from the alternative.
.
Democrats are predicting that Republicans will become deficit hawks the moment the presidency shifts. Sure they care about a bloating of the defence budget (but I doubt they would mind upping pay for soldiers and stuff) while cutting taxes skewed at the rich and company's while then chirping that benefits should be cut.
I was merely noting that the Tea Party went completely silent and obvious placed party over ideology.
.
Also he could have done this move with Sessions, at the very start of his term. Curious he only does it now after he got a more willing AG.
Bullshit. No one knew the Steele dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants that early, or that the entire Obama Administration had rigged Trump's transition to be framed in scandal. Trump never knew that Sessions would recuse himself and leave the entire ordeal into the laps of the people that created it. They are scared to death now, and I am having so much fun watching them lose their minds... except for the ones that are smart enough to keep their mouths shut
.
Sessions reclusing himself was the obvious action to be taken, he was in the Trump transition team! "Law & Order"?
So much rigging done by getting russians to appeal to Trump's campaign and staff. Yeah, that clearly was under Obama's directive...
.
Bob Mueller just came out and spoke for the first time since the release of his report. He announced the closing of the case, the closing of his office, and his retirement. He went on to say his report speaks for itself, and he will not elaborate further... he will speak no more about it, and if Congress forces him to appear, they will get nothing more from him than they have already received.
The meat of his statement was that he could not charge Trump with a crime, even if he wanted to... so if charging the President of a crime was the intent of the investigation, the entire thing was a fools errand from the start. My personal take from this statement has to be that Mueller wanted to charge Trump with obstruction, but he could not charge a sitting President with a crime because there could be no trial while he holds office.
I believe this creates more questions than answers, and we are not getting the answers from Bob Mueller. This was not a good day for Trump, and the drum beat to impeach will get much louder. The ball will now be in the hands of Fancy Nancy Pelosi. 
.
So no conspiracy I guess? So yes to only action being the impeachment procedure? And yes/no on obstruction?
.
Nature itself throws more CO2 into the air than we do, and we can't even begin to keep up with it. One volcano eruption would erase 100 years of depriving ourselves of a more efficient life. Wildfires caused by lightning... or just some idiot with a match, can do the same thing. I have no problem with improving things to live on a cleaner planet... no one is against that... we are totally against any government using "climate change" as an excuse to impose a Progressive or Socialist political agenda.
.
Thing is, nature's emissions were in balance with its carbon fixation potential. You are basically complaining about a river not just flooding your town ever so often but it actually being submerged by 100 feet of water after some rich dude build a dam downstream from you.
So you agree that polluters have to face consequences (be it monetary or corrective in nature) but just not up to the point where they get hurt with it? Sounds like you don't want any consequences to begin with, can I interest you in a oilwell right next to your house?
.
From what was said on the Mueller report the only reason that they did not press charges was because Trump is president and he believes that criminal proceedings cannot be done on a sitting president.
I hear ya... but is that really the truth?
I watched this again, and again, and I thought about it real hard for a long time, and I can't understand why Bob Mueller did this today. We didn't learn anything new from his statement. So, I have come to the conclusion that he spoke today because he doesn't want to testify in front of Congress. He knows the Democrats are not happy with the results of his investigation, and they are furiously screaming for his presence to explain why they still have a President Trump in office, but Democrats will not be the only people to ask questions. Republicans will also be asking questions, and they actually have more questions for Mr. Mueller than what went wrong with it.
Mueller said very clearly that he could not find evidence that Trump did not commit a crime. This statement is totally out of line. His job, like every other Federal Investigator, was to find evidence of a crime, or criminal behavior. It's never up to them to find evidence to clear anyone of a crime... everyone is innocent until proven guilty... so, if there is no evidence to prove that someone committed a crime... they are "Not Guilty".
I now believe Mueller doesn't want to be questioned by Congress, but he also wants Congressional Democrats to keep up the pressure. This could very well be Mueller's attempt to cover his own ass, because his investigation will be investigated as well.
We shall see... there's much more to come.
.
His statement is a roundabout way of stating that due to obstructions of Trump himself, on his orders or by people on his staff, he can't verify what did or didn't happen and as such he can't exonerate Trump of the various pieces he did find. Like finding a corpse in a burned down appartment which the suspect torched himself.
Also, so Mueller is now a Democrat? >_>
.
Natural co2 emissions are unavoidable and we shouldn't be adding to it at the rate we are. With our current level of technology we cannot combat the changes and within reason should avoid anything that causes further damage. Also I am more worried about not doing something we should do because fear of a "socialist agenda".
Have you asked yourself the question... "Aside from executing half of the entire population of the planet, which is the real problem if a problem really exists... Have you come up with any solution... just one... that does not give more power to government over the lives, freedom, and liberty of us normal people?"
This is what you're surrendering to oligarchs if you entertain their bullshit. Any so-called solution, to any so-called problem, will not hinder, interfere, or infringe, on any American Constitutional right granted to us by our founders... far too many, much better than you and I, have given their last full measure to ensure that agreement does not perish from the Earth. Anyone who tries... dies.
.
It is nice that you want to be an origionalist, but society evolves and so do nations. If you like being originalist so much, go protest every amendment after #10.
Also, lol at "oligarchs" being green bogeymans. I see you heard an unfamiliar term but used it badly.
.
Well Mueller did find plenty of obstruction which is a crime, what he couldn't find was evidence that Trump didn't collude with the Russians.
I'm gonna try to get you to look into things a little deeper.
Rod Rosenstein was acting Attorney General, because Jeff Sessions was bullied into recusing himself. Rod Rosenstein signed one of the FISA applications for the warrants against the Trump Campaign. James Comey signed the original. Sally Yates also signed one of the renewals. These applications were submitted to the FISA court, by these people, on the pledge that the Steele Dossier was verified as true and accurate. This was a lie.
Rod Rosenstein declared upon the resignation of Jeff Sessions, that he would resign from the DOJ when William Barr took the office. He did not follow through on that declaration. Instead he stayed with William Barr, finalized the Mueller investigation, signed off on the closure of that investigation, and stood behind William Barr when he addressed the nation on the findings. You don't find this a little strange? I believe Rod Rosenstein made a deal to ensure his freedom... and this is all part of it.
CBS just interviewed Barr, and asked him if he believes the Obama Administration committed treason against President Trump. Barr said... "Not as a legal matter"... "Sometimes people can convince themselves that what they're doing is in the higher interest and better good... They don't realize that what they're doing is really antithetical to the democratic system that we have".
Now I ask you... Does it sound like he doesn't already know what happened?
There is no obstruction, because there never should have been an investigation. There was an entire 3 year ordeal, that never should have happened... and there was never any crime. Democrats are so scared... they're screaming about anything they can find.
.
You keep coming back to the Steele dossier, that thing that was mostly proven right (other claims unverified up till now) and was at best a side-dish to the initial and continued FISA applications.
On Rod Rosenstein, he seems to be only in it for himself. Which is a natural reaction to the clusterfuck that is unfolding around him.
Yes there was, and is, obstruction. Heck the DoJ is eve clear that there is no need for a verified (if still possible due to obstruction) crime to be found to still getting slammed for obstruction. Trump, and followers, only lawfull action would have been pleading the 5th (which some did). You do NOT try to highjack an investigion or otherwise tamper with it just cause you don't like it. "Law & Order"?
Sign In
Create Account
Back to top
