Well one of the big issues is the economic one, to be specific the economic one of the nation builder. You should build a nations economy to aid itself, not to aid the builder. Each time it was more like a colonial 'we will now tell you what to grow' type deals it all broke down. That and this one ended in a defence contracted bonanza festival. If the main portion of your "nation building" goes to people swinging guns around infront og the locals, you are clearly missing the point. I have heared figures of "90% gun-money" thrown around (unknown of validity) but that alone should tell you the "building" part wasn't the main deal.
Maybe I missed the point. I probably didn't explain myself well enough , so we manged to get our wires crossed.
No, I don't think for one minute that nation building means (as you put it), "people swinging guns around infront <sic> og <sic> the locals."
When I think of nation building, its more in line with the Marshall and MacArthur Plans for post WWII Germany and Japan respectively.
However, the benefit to both parties has to be mutually beneficial. Does that mean the builder gets to exploit the resources of the builder or install a puppet regime? No, absolutely not.
It means, providing the necessary security, guidance, and if necessary funds so an implacable foe with an ideology and world view diametrically opposed to ours, becomes a stable, prosperous, and democratic state.
Need an example?
In 1919 we (Belgium is included in that "we"), punished Germany with the Treaty of Versailles. If we had followed Wilson's 14 Points, I highly doubt, the soc-economic conditions would have developed in Germany to allow for Hitler to rise to power. In 1945, a different approach was taken. Look at the results. I haven't heard of any Huns bayoneting Belgian babies, or nailing Belgian Nuns to church doors. Sorry couldn't resist, WWI propaganda cracks me up. I hope no offence was taken, as none was intended. If offence was taken, I sincerely apologize.
Could a similar approach, a Marshall Plan for Afghanistan have worked? Maybe. As I said in my previous post, Afghanistan is known as the "Graveyard of Foreign Armies." They are still beholden to a very medieval way of thinking. An intermix of tribal and family loyalties. A country where War Lords still exist, where anyone with enough muscle and guns can carve out a fiefdom.
Maybe.
It would have taken a lot for us to give Afghanistan a chance. It would have required a lot of patience, blood, and treasure to secure a democratic future for that nation. Something I don't think our soft and decadent society was prepared to give. Look at the response to the Covid-19 pandemic, if you don't believe m