http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/cybernations.png

 

Cybernations Mafia

 
Only the following roles may exist in this game:

Vanilla Townie, Bodyguard, Commuter, Sane Cop, Role Cop, Vanilla Cop, Flavor Cop, Doctor, Friendly Neighbor, Follower, Gunsmith, Innocent Child, Jack of All Trades, Jailkeeper, Mafia Goon, Mafia Encryptor, Mafia Godfather, Mafia Ninja, Mafia Strongman, Mafia Traitor, Mason, Miller, Motion Detector, Neapolitan, Neighbor, Neighborizer, Nurse, Roleblocker, Rolestopper, Serial Killer, Tracker, Universal Backup, Vigilante, Voyeur, Watcher

The following modifiers may also exist in this game:

Ascetic, Backup (with or without primary role present), Bulletproof, Enabler (with or without primary role present), Even/Odd Night, Macho, Neighbor, Non-Consecutive Night, Weak, X-Shot

 

Assigned character names are various alliances from Cybernations. Ignore all current Cybernations foreign relations. The current treaty web has no bearing on the assigned characters. Alliances were randomly assigned as "good" or "bad" roles so one's personal opinion of an alliance will not necessarily translate to this game.
 

Sample Role PM said:

You are Valhalla, a Vanilla Townie. Your power is in your vote. You win when the Town controls the game.

 
Players:

1) Imran Ehsan (New Pacific Order) a Town 2-Shot Roleblocker has been rolled on night 3.
2) Robert2424 (Independent Republic of Orange Nations) a Town Universal Backup, has been rolled on night 7.
3) d3mon (Green Protection Agency) a Town Jack-of-all-Trades has been disbanded on day 3.
4) Samus (Umbrella) a Town 2-Shot Rolestopper has been rolled on night 1.
5) Yehom (New Polar Order) a Town Even-Night Follower, has been rolled on night 5.
6) Rafay (Orange Defense Network) a Mafia Jack-of-all-Trades has been disbanded on day 6.
7) Canik
8) Chaplain of Death (Doombird Doomcave) a Town Non-Consecutive Night Watcher has been rolled on night 3.
9) Ali bin Turban (R&R) a Town Vanilla Cop has been rolled on night 4.
10) iSocialism
11) King Hitler (NATO) a Town 1-Shot Commuter has been rolled on night 2.
12) Kaziocore (The Legion) a Town Odd-Night Tracker has been disbanded on day 2.
13) Finster Baby (Mostly Harmless Alliance) a Mafia 1-Shot Strongman has been disbanded on day 5.
14) Rhizoctonia (The Dark Templar) the Mafia Godfather has been disbanded on day 4.
15) Lyner
16) Avater (Federation of Armed Nations), a Town Motion Detector, has been forced to disband on day 7.
17) Roquentin
18) Mandarijn

19) KevinH (Sparta) a Town Miller, has been rolled on night 6.

 

Rules:

• During the Day phase each player may speak and vote in-thread.
• If a player receives the majority of the available votes during the Day, they are lynched.
• At deadline, a player with half-majority will be lynched.
• You may vote No Lynch.
• After the Day, the game goes to Night.
• The game thread is closed during the Night. The Mafia may speak to each other at Night.
• All Active Roles may submit actions via PM at Night.
• The Mafia can, as a faction, kill one player at Night.
• After the Night, the game goes to Day.
• All dead players (lynched or killed) can no longer participate in the game.
• Basic rules for maintaining the integrity of the game thread are in effect (i.e. players may not quote their Role PMs, nor may they discuss the game outside the game thread unless otherwise permitted, etc.)
• The game is won when only one faction remains in the game.
• Mass role-claiming is not allowed, but you may reveal your role if you have something interesting to share.
• You may pm me questions or ask them in the game thread, but you may not get an answer to some things.
• When voting, please enter your vote on a separate line of your post so that it isn't easily missed.

Game Days will last seven days.
Game Nights will last 48 hours.

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

It's Day 2 and Kaziocore is alive.  

 

He must be on the scum's side.

 

 

Seconded

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

 

 

 

Seriously?  I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason.  So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning."  Both are soft reasons for accusing.  No one has wanted to come forward with information, so this is where we're at.  Lyner seems to be the only one to come out that he might have something, though only "sort of."  I'm curious what it is, but also rather him not expose his role this early unless the information is helpful or useful.  

 

 

 

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

 

 

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

That's a little disconcerting because what if I agree with what someone has said, but have nothing new to add to it? If someone convinces me with their brilliant reasoning and I vote that means I'm bandwagoning?

 

Right now we have very little evidence of anything or on anyone. I don't feel like I can make a educated guess about anything and I'm not fond of wild ass guessing.

 

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

 

So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning." Both are soft reasons for accusing.

 

I have no clue what you are trying to say here.

 

 

That's a little disconcerting because what if I agree with what someone has said, but have nothing new to add to it? If someone convinces me with their brilliant reasoning and I vote that means I'm bandwagoning?

 

Voting for someone "just for fun" is bandwagoning. Providing no reason or no reason other then.."yeah I agree with him" is bandwagoning. No one said you cant do it. You can provide whatever reason you want for your vote. But I will also call you out for doing it because thats a pretty good indicator of scumminess.

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

 

 

We need to replace Roq, not to ping him.

Why the former and not the later? Just curious, generally we try and ping first and then replace if ping doesn't pongs.

Roq has been pinged. If he cannot continue actively, he will be replaced.

 

Why the former and not the later? Just curious, generally we try and ping first and then replace if ping doesn't pongs.

 

This game is about talking with others, not just about stopping by every few days to cast a vote. It would be be great for Roq to stay with us because he's intelligent guy and surely would make discussions more interesting...but that would require him to devote some time and for now it seems he can't afford that.

 

Apart from the metagame, do you have anything to add on things that are happening right now / had happened last night ?

 

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

 

 

 

Seriously?  I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason.  So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning."  Both are soft reasons for accusing.  No one has wanted to come forward with information, so this is where we're at.  Lyner seems to be the only one to come out that he might have something, though only "sort of."  I'm curious what it is, but also rather him not expose his role this early unless the information is helpful or useful.  

 

What are those baseless accusations (please don't quote D1, because many people did that and it has no importance)?

 

So far at D2 we got:

 

1. KHitler jumping the gun - which seems like overzealous, inexperienced townie action to me and he gets noting to prove his choice (apart from D1 bickering).

2. Avater comes in and supports KH with accusations.

3. Imran hits Avater back with his suspicions.

4. It turns out Avater is not accusing Imran for real, but just for fun.

5. Imran's not buying his explanation.

6. You came in and attack Imran.

 

Why do you have problem with Imran, yet a guy that's claims to "vote on D2 just for fun" is no concern for you? How far you think we'll get with a jester crew confusing rest of the town with their "fun voting"?

 

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

 

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

That's a little disconcerting because what if I agree with what someone has said, but have nothing new to add to it? If someone convinces me with their brilliant reasoning and I vote that means I'm bandwagoning?

 

Right now we have very little evidence of anything or on anyone. I don't feel like I can make a educated guess about anything and I'm not fond of wild ass guessing.

 

That's a nature of the game. When you're townie, can you tell a difference between a townie that doesn't add anything on his own and just follows someone's vote against you (because he think that's right choice) and a scum that's just adding his vote to lynch innocent? You're psychologist, you should know the answer .

 

Also I believe you haven't told us yet if you got any info last night ?

I don't know anything, but here are some thoughts:

• I play the game for fun
• Ali bin Turban seems the most pro-town at the moment

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

Let's try to avoid such remarks. I read that topic and it was really fun to watch your duel. I'm not sure if I would vote against Rhizo after his defense, but you made it to the end. You both did fantastic job there . I don't think Rhizo's sore...he just might be a scum again

 

 

That's a nature of the game. When you're townie, can you tell a difference between a townie that doesn't add anything on his own and just follows someone's vote against you (because he think that's right choice) and a scum that's just adding his vote to lynch innocent? You're psychologist, you should know the answer .

Not a psychologist, I'm a psychotherapist - a psychiatric social worker to be exact.  One of my pet peeves is that on TV and in movies mental health professionals are portrayed as either idiots or mind readers.  I am neither.  I have a decent bullshit meter, but I have been fooled many times in the past and expect to be fooled in the future.  I'm also a very genuine person, I find it next to impossible to not be myself for any significant length of time, which may make me not cut out for Mafia.

 

So far, no one is raising flags for me as scum.  Between this game and the Teen Titans I'm feeling more and more insecure about my Mafia abilities.  I'm not being  saying this to complain, but rather to explain where I am coming from.

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

 

So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning." Both are soft reasons for accusing.

 

I have no clue what you are trying to say here.

 

 

That's a little disconcerting because what if I agree with what someone has said, but have nothing new to add to it? If someone convinces me with their brilliant reasoning and I vote that means I'm bandwagoning?

 

Voting for someone "just for fun" is bandwagoning. Providing no reason or no reason other then.."yeah I agree with him" is bandwagoning. No one said you cant do it. You can provide whatever reason you want for your vote. But I will also call you out for doing it because thats a pretty good indicator of scumminess.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

 

 

 

Seriously?  I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason.  So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning."  Both are soft reasons for accusing.  No one has wanted to come forward with information, so this is where we're at.  Lyner seems to be the only one to come out that he might have something, though only "sort of."  I'm curious what it is, but also rather him not expose his role this early unless the information is helpful or useful.  

 

What are those baseless accusations (please don't quote D1, because many people did that and it has no importance)?

 

So far at D2 we got:

 

1. KHitler jumping the gun - which seems like overzealous, inexperienced townie action to me and he gets noting to prove his choice (apart from D1 bickering).

2. Avater comes in and supports KH with accusations.

3. Imran hits Avater back with his suspicions.

4. It turns out Avater is not accusing Imran for real, but just for fun.

5. Imran's not buying his explanation.

6. You came in and attack Imran.

 

Why do you have problem with Imran, yet a guy that's claims to "vote on D2 just for fun" is no concern for you? How far you think we'll get with a jester crew confusing rest of the town with their "fun voting"?

 

 

 

 

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

Let's try to avoid such remarks. I read that topic and it was really fun to watch your duel. I'm not sure if I would vote against Rhizo after his defense, but you made it to the end. You both did fantastic job there . I don't think Rhizo's sore...he just might be a scum again

 

 

 

I'll address you both, since you both are basically asking the same thing.

 

1.  No I'm not sore about what happened in another game.  I was caught, and had to do my best to get myself out of a jam.  Being my first game ever, and being so early in the game, it forced me to get real acquainted with the game and a lot of searching on wiki to try to weasel my way out of it.  I can't be mad someone had evidence against me and if I were in their shoes, I'd do the same.  I tried my best following being caught, it wasn't enough, o well..simply jumped me into the game quick and forced to learn what to do next. I had fun with it. Plus, you assumed I was scum, which I wasn't, so really your actions didn't help you find the real scum...whereas I was the basically the same as a town Vig, as I was truely hoping to knock out who I thought was scum.  But tis a whole different game, and I'm not someone to bring that into a whole different game.  I'm glad you have now accused 3 people in this game of holding grudges...you may want to slow up on throwing accusations around every time someone argues with you.  

 

2.  Because I don't believe Avater's actions are really anything worthy of being seen as scummish, yet Imran acts as if it is.  I mean seriously, calling a bandwagon on a 2nd vote when it takes 10 to lynch is a comical.  There was no real evidence to make people suspect Imran is scummish, do you really think a scum is going to jump on that bandwagon after a single vote was casted on Imran with no real good information to argue as a reason to vote Imran?  If it was up to 5 or so against him, and someone just went along with it without really giving a reason, then I would agree he'd be worthy of such a claim as a bandwagon.  IMO, Avater's reasoning, and Imran's are all baseless.  

 

3.  Imran calling out people for baseless accusations, when this is the individual who pushes for a lynch on D1 always.  Imran has no problem lynching someone with zero to no information to go on, yet calls out others when they do the same.  Sorry, that doesn't float in my boat.  If you're going to be cool with lynching someone with no information to go on, don't call out or get mad when your the target.  Imran is cool with lynching someone on D1, as long as it's not him..his mood changes when it's him.  And before you say it, I know it's not D1 anymore.  It's D2, and so far, we have pretty much the same information on D2 as we had on D1, besides being down a townie.  I've been waiting to see if anything has anything of note to present, and so far no one has.  Which means, we're currently where we were in D1.  So again, to my point, Imran has no problem lynching someone with the same amount of information as we do now, so he shouldn't be upset if what he advocates for suddenly is directed at him.  

 

At this very point, there is no information to shine suspicion on anyone.  It's basically like we're in D1 still.  I have yet to see any information or suspicion that would make me feel someone is likely scum, so if no information is revealed, the "fun" vote is basically where we are at.  KH and Avater's reasoning to suspect Imran is not good enough for me, and Imran's bandwagon reason of Avater is not either.  So as it stands now, if I had to vote someone now, it would be as much a guess as it was in D1.  I am not going to just go around voting and unvoting without some actual suspicion like others seem to like to do.  

I'm sure somebody does know something; they just aren't sharing.

I don't blame them either.

The cop might have found a townie, a tracker might have seen someone go somewhere with no effect.

If that's the case, we should watch the activity level and lynch an inactive.

 

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

 

So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning." Both are soft reasons for accusing.

 

I have no clue what you are trying to say here.

 

 

That's a little disconcerting because what if I agree with what someone has said, but have nothing new to add to it? If someone convinces me with their brilliant reasoning and I vote that means I'm bandwagoning?

 

Voting for someone "just for fun" is bandwagoning. Providing no reason or no reason other then.."yeah I agree with him" is bandwagoning. No one said you cant do it. You can provide whatever reason you want for your vote. But I will also call you out for doing it because thats a pretty good indicator of scumminess.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can we ping Roq? As he seems to have forgotten about this game... Although he has been on the forum on the 28th and if he's scum, I can see him advocating to kill Samus as well. But meh, he just needs to post more.

 

Also Avater has hardly post anything and now he's pretty quick on the lynch wagon. It could be just him being new to the game (as we've seen last game as well ). But it is pretty suspicious Avater...

 

I also have nothing (usefull) to share from N1. (I'm still leaving that in the middle )

Yeah u r right i am just a noob trying to figure out this game , i voted Imran just for fun 

 

 

Fun votes ended on Day 1. Any votes and accusations from D2 onwards will be taken seriously and it will be assumed you are bandwagoning if you provide no valid reason.

 

 

 

Seriously?  I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason.  So far you had D1, basing it off posts, and now D2 2 people "Bandwagoning."  Both are soft reasons for accusing.  No one has wanted to come forward with information, so this is where we're at.  Lyner seems to be the only one to come out that he might have something, though only "sort of."  I'm curious what it is, but also rather him not expose his role this early unless the information is helpful or useful.  

 

What are those baseless accusations (please don't quote D1, because many people did that and it has no importance)?

 

So far at D2 we got:

 

1. KHitler jumping the gun - which seems like overzealous, inexperienced townie action to me and he gets noting to prove his choice (apart from D1 bickering).

2. Avater comes in and supports KH with accusations.

3. Imran hits Avater back with his suspicions.

4. It turns out Avater is not accusing Imran for real, but just for fun.

5. Imran's not buying his explanation.

6. You came in and attack Imran.

 

Why do you have problem with Imran, yet a guy that's claims to "vote on D2 just for fun" is no concern for you? How far you think we'll get with a jester crew confusing rest of the town with their "fun voting"?

 

 

 

 

 

Seriously? I'll make sure to take note of every time you throw out baseless accusations or votes with no valid reason. 

 

Where did I throw out baseless accusations? Are you still sore about me catching you lying and getting you lynched in the other game? Because I dont see any "baseless accusations" being thrown about by me in this game.

Let's try to avoid such remarks. I read that topic and it was really fun to watch your duel. I'm not sure if I would vote against Rhizo after his defense, but you made it to the end. You both did fantastic job there . I don't think Rhizo's sore...he just might be a scum again

 

 

 

I'll address you both, since you both are basically asking the same thing.

 

1.  No I'm not sore about what happened in another game.  I was caught, and had to do my best to get myself out of a jam.  Being my first game ever, and being so early in the game, it forced me to get real acquainted with the game and a lot of searching on wiki to try to weasel my way out of it.  I can't be mad someone had evidence against me and if I were in their shoes, I'd do the same.  I tried my best following being caught, it wasn't enough, o well..simply jumped me into the game quick and forced to learn what to do next. I had fun with it. Plus, you assumed I was scum, which I wasn't, so really your actions didn't help you find the real scum...whereas I was the basically the same as a town Vig, as I was truely hoping to knock out who I thought was scum.  But tis a whole different game, and I'm not someone to bring that into a whole different game.  I'm glad you have now accused 3 people in this game of holding grudges...you may want to slow up on throwing accusations around every time someone argues with you.  

 

2.  Because I don't believe Avater's actions are really anything worthy of being seen as scummish, yet Imran acts as if it is.  I mean seriously, calling a bandwagon on a 2nd vote when it takes 10 to lynch is a comical.  There was no real evidence to make people suspect Imran is scummish, do you really think a scum is going to jump on that bandwagon after a single vote was casted on Imran with no real good information to argue as a reason to vote Imran?  If it was up to 5 or so against him, and someone just went along with it without really giving a reason, then I would agree he'd be worthy of such a claim as a bandwagon.  IMO, Avater's reasoning, and Imran's are all baseless.  

 

3.  Imran calling out people for baseless accusations, when this is the individual who pushes for a lynch on D1 always.  Imran has no problem lynching someone with zero to no information to go on, yet calls out others when they do the same.  Sorry, that doesn't float in my boat.  If you're going to be cool with lynching someone with no information to go on, don't call out or get mad when your the target.  Imran is cool with lynching someone on D1, as long as it's not him..his mood changes when it's him.  And before you say it, I know it's not D1 anymore.  It's D2, and so far, we have pretty much the same information on D2 as we had on D1, besides being down a townie.  I've been waiting to see if anything has anything of note to present, and so far no one has.  Which means, we're currently where we were in D1.  So again, to my point, Imran has no problem lynching someone with the same amount of information as we do now, so he shouldn't be upset if what he advocates for suddenly is directed at him.  

 

At this very point, there is no information to shine suspicion on anyone.  It's basically like we're in D1 still.  I have yet to see any information or suspicion that would make me feel someone is likely scum, so if no information is revealed, the "fun" vote is basically where we are at.  KH and Avater's reasoning to suspect Imran is not good enough for me, and Imran's bandwagon reason of Avater is not either.  So as it stands now, if I had to vote someone now, it would be as much a guess as it was in D1.  I am not going to just go around voting and unvoting without some actual suspicion like others seem to like to do.  

 

This made me reconsider my vote. We honestly don't have much to go off of in D2 and over-analyzing and jumping the gun probably isn't the best course of action. We'll either have to figure a plan out, wait for someone to come forward with information, or just do another no lynch and hope D3 brings better results.

 

Unvote.

I'll play, but idk about the in-depth analysis part. Still new to this, so the meta-discussion is kind of going at  a million miles per second for me. No vote for this one given the issues for this one.

Don't go crying that there is no info to Lynch on D2 when you refused to Lynch on d1. If you lynched on d1 there will be wagons to analyze and probably chance to identify some potential scum. But all you guys went on a merry kumbaya of no Lynch behind. So of course D2 will be as boring as d1.

Sweet!  The no-lynch debate on Day 2!

 

Some scum would be on the lynch wagon, and some would not.  So we'd have one less townie without any better chances of identifying scum.

Sweet!  The no-lynch debate on Day 2!

 

Some scum would be on the lynch wagon, and some would not.  So we'd have one less townie without any better chances of identifying scum.

So what do you suggest?

Early in the game I like to sit back and watch the game and what everyone has to say. Right now, I have no opinions. Nothing to go off of.

 

Also can we get a vote count @thewarrior

Kevin, I highly doubt there going to be a no lynch day 2. 

 

I gotta catch up. 

The very least that can be said, Irman is taking an Aggressive approch, though he seems to be more aggressive the more time passes. Either 3 could be scum. However, I didn't know 2 was considered a bandwagon. 3 maybe, but that can't be considered a bandwagon, sorry. 

I'll post vote count tomorrow morning.

I was reading previous games and activity seems to be something people go on. Kaziocore has been posting less frequently than others but seems like he'd post more  normally. If i'm a breaking rule let me know, but I don't think I am.

 

Unvote

 

Vote: Kaziocore